8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 30, 2014#26

Great discussion on affordable rents for downtown as things heat up.... apparently this is a huge problem in Detroit where only the upscale can afford. Part of the problem --that they share with us but maybe even moreso -- is tightness on new supply as financing is hard to come by in "risky" cities.

IIRC, some Lafayette Square residents recently were wary of supporting a proposed rehab that would include some affordable units.... the horror of having some young professionals in the neighborhood! Not sure if that ever got approved or not.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 30, 2014#27

I have two friends who live together in a one bedroom apartment in the CWE that only costs $400/mo. They both work and are in their 20's. If the CWE has units that cheap, Downtown should have more units that cheap as well. They aren't easy to come by. Millennials, who according to nextSTL are "saving the City," have tens of thousands of dollars worth of student loan debt that many of them won't get out of for decades. You spend $40,000 a year for four years at SLU plus interest, you can't afford sh*t. You can't just "get" a high paying job, even with a college degree. $400 between two people is pretty good, and again, if an expensive neighborhood like the CWE has places that cheap, Downtown should as well.

2,324
Life MemberLife Member
2,324

PostJan 30, 2014#28

^I agree 100%

I'm wondering if the cost to rehab these buildings (new roof, electrical, windows etc) is so expensive that it's just doesn't make financial sense to charge $600/mo. But second thought, even new construction (like the atrocious Adventura or whatever its called) is going for $1K/month. I don't get it.

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostJan 31, 2014#29

mattonarsenal wrote:
flipz wrote:
Gateway City wrote:The subsidized units never made sense to me. They charged 6-700 a month instead of the regular $1k for a one bed in most places but then had a ridiculous income restriction. If you're making $15k a year, you shouldn't be paying $700 for an apartment.
There are very few rent subsidized units downtown. The affordable units are rent and income restricted, not subsidized. And, people making $15,000 a year wouldn't qualify to live in those units. More likely people making $25,000 to $30,000.

I thought they were subsidized when they were built and as a condition have to have a certain amount of affordable units for some amount of time. That is what I meant by subsidized. I don't remember the specific income but when I looked 4-5 years ago, the income restriction didn't make sense with what they were charging for the units. Maybe it is just me and I don't like to spend such a large percentage of my income on rent.

shadrach wrote: I'm wondering if the cost to rehab these buildings (new roof, electrical, windows etc) is so expensive that it's just doesn't make financial sense to charge $600/mo. But second thought, even new construction (like the atrocious Adventura or whatever its called) is going for $1K/month. I don't get it.
The cost is much higher I think. Downtown you had a bunch of old warehouses that were converted into modern residential units, with all that entails.

In the CWE the buildings always were residential, many of which have not been updated any time recently. If they have been updated, then it is mostly cosmetic stuff. You also have a much more diverse range of building types, and owners. Someone that bought an apartment/building 20 years ago when it was crazy cheap could rent it out for cheap without doing any updates.

New construction is just expensive. I imagine when new residential construction happens downtown, rent will be even higher. The only larger (steel/concrete) buildings I can remember being built recently were built in the CWE as condos that sold for $500k+. I wonder what that WU building will be charging in the loop, or the one that is being built on Pershing.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 31, 2014#30

Student Housing through the school, any school, is almost always more expensive than living off campus. When I was a junior, I paid over $700/mo. to live on campus. It was bogus. My advice to any new college students: do not live in student housing.

I'm sure Webster's presence at the Arcade will mean that there will be lots of students interested in living Downtown. If colleges continue building Downtown like this, more and more students will want to live there. That's why units as cheap as the Arcade and Gentry's Landing will be very important. These people aren't going to pay $1,500/mo. plus utilities for a one bedroom apartment. The Butler Bros. Building is a great location for students and 20-somethings in general but there's no way people that young can afford it if it's as expensive as the rest of Downtown.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostJan 31, 2014#31

Maybe the issue isn't that the apartments are unaffordable or need government assistance to make them affordable for college students or new grads. Most people graduate college and have roommates to reduce living expenses. Not until we start making enough money, say 2-5 years on average down the road do we move out into our own apartment or house. When I graduated from college I rented a 3 bedroom apartment with 2 others for 1200 a month resulting in 400 for my monthly rent. The majority of units downtown are 1 bedrooms at 1000 sq feet or less with rent at 1.10 a sq foot. This make having a roommate virtually impossible to offset costs. Maybe the problem with downtown is that there are too many 1 bedroom units and not enough 2-3 bedroom units.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 31, 2014#32

There are some that aren't bad. Like I said, Gentry's Landing is $800 for a two bedroom. This is what Downtown needs more of, especially if colleges are going to keep choosing to locate courses there. I was going to split that with two friends which isn't bad whatsoever. It never happened, but if I don't get a place in the Arcade, I might go with Gentry's because there aren't many, if any, other options that affordable Downtown. I hope the Chemical has a few floors that the Webster and SLU Law students can actually afford.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 31, 2014#33

I think several things will help with rents downtown....

-- demand seems pretty strong (not superhot like San Fran of course but not bad either) so a greater supply in itself will help some
-- have some of the new supply have smaller units (commanding less per unit but equalling out in the end)
-- have some of the new supply have larger spaces as downtown2007 mentions but functional for and marketed to roommate sharing for young adults/students.
-- have these youth-oriented rentals designed with fewer high-end finishes and amenities.... more Gentry Landings if you will.
-- minimize parking needs.... for example, the Butler Building proposal for luxury units envisions significant parking.... a development that seeks at least in part carless students or young adults might be able to utilize one or more of the floors for more income-producing units instead of for car storage.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostJan 31, 2014#34

Significant parking seems unnecessary as the streetcar comes closer to reality, but I guess it's not a 100% thing yet.

7,799
Life MemberLife Member
7,799

PostJan 31, 2014#35

This is a HUGE building. A renovation and filling it with residents would make a big impact on downtown.

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostNov 22, 2016#36

From a story in the STLBJ about the Jefferson Arms development:
Sarimsakci, who is originally from Turkey and now lives in San Francisco, said he was initially drawn to St. Louis by the Butler Brothers building at 1717 Olive St. — a building he says he's still negotiating to buy. Alterra has a history with Butler Brothers facilities, as the company is now in the process of redeveloping one in Dallas for $90 million.
^ bolds mine.

-RBB

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 22, 2016#37

^ I think successful redevelopment of the Butler Bros. will be a huge turning point for Downtown West with its strategic location.

2,324
Life MemberLife Member
2,324

PostNov 22, 2016#38

Agreed! Huge is the right word. I've been thinking about this building a lot as I was just walked by it Saturday night. (Parked by the new police HQ, heading over to the Peabody.) It's dark and gloomy right now, as is everything around it. If it gets rehabbed (with exterior lighting, trees etc.) this would radically change and unlock this area.

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

PostNov 22, 2016#39

I just hope that it gets a good retail presence. I know it may be hard because the building is on a slope, but I think it would be a mistake to ignore the Locust and Olive sides retail wise.

738
Senior MemberSenior Member
738

PostMar 17, 2019#40

Awesome building. And I mean that by the sheer size of it
Have plans for this building long faded away?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostMar 17, 2019#41

hebeters2 wrote:
Mar 17, 2019
Awesome building. And I mean that by the sheer size of it
Have plans for this building long faded away?
I believe plans have faded away but not fully. Some people have looked at it and plans have circulated but nothing truly got past the drawing board. The main reason is the sheer size of the structure. Apartments would be a hard fit, the same goes for a hotel (which Downtown is getting flooded with). Office space is a tough one and warehouse space just isn't really needed. I think this one will have to sit out until the next development cycle when hopefully Railway Exchange, Chemical, Jefferson Arms, Municipal Courts and Shell are taken care of or almost fully taken care of.

2,674
Life MemberLife Member
2,674

PostMar 05, 2020#42

With success of Union Station, Enterprise redevelopment, and MLS the time to strike on this redevelopment is passing.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostMar 05, 2020#43

chriss752 wrote:
Mar 17, 2019
hebeters2 wrote:
Mar 17, 2019
Awesome building.  And I mean that by the sheer size of it
Have plans for this building long faded away?
I believe plans have faded away but not fully. Some people have looked at it and plans have circulated but nothing truly got past the drawing board. The main reason is the sheer size of the structure. Apartments would be a hard fit, the same goes for a hotel (which Downtown is getting flooded with). Office space is a tough one and warehouse space just isn't really needed. I think this one will have to sit out until the next development cycle when hopefully Railway Exchange, Chemical, Jefferson Arms, Municipal Courts and Shell are taken care of or almost fully taken care of.
Why are apartments a hard fit in your opinion?  It seems like the obvious reuse.  Parking is limited but other than that why not apartments.

951
Super MemberSuper Member
951

PostMar 05, 2020#44

"Parking is limited" I have seen cars enter the building from the Olive street side.  Is there thus indoor parking?  If there is WOW what an asset for those with apts in the building!

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostMar 05, 2020#45

chris fuller wrote:
Mar 05, 2020
"Parking is limited" I have seen cars enter the building from the Olive street side.  Is there thus indoor parking?  If there is WOW what an asset for those with apts in the building!
Yeah not sure of the whole layout but I was referring to number of spaces relative to the size of the building.  Maybe its not parking, that's why i asked.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostMar 06, 2020#46

Apartments would require a large chunk of the middle of the building to be cut out. The atrium/cut now isn’t enough and would lead to a lot of dead space. So, it’s a bit complicated

9,531
Life MemberLife Member
9,531

PostMar 06, 2020#47

Apartments would have to be like 10 feet wide and 100 long and even that may not work bc you would still just have 1 window.

1,677
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,677

PostMar 06, 2020#48

Stop teasing me with updates to this thread.

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostMar 06, 2020#49

bwcrow1s wrote:
Mar 06, 2020
Stop teasing me with updates to this thread.
Update:  The Butler Bros. building is still owned by a rug importer / retailer from Indianapolis...  🙂

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostSep 12, 2020#50

"As-is, the building contains 718,660 square feet and consists of eight stories. A preliminary redevelopment plan includes 342 multifamily units with 397 garage parking spaces."

https://multifamily.cushwake.com/Listings/27159

Read more posts (286 remaining)