712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostMay 26, 2010#26

Bike Share at SIUE :!: Nobody mentioned this before,
the post covered and there's a website.

Oh my goodness. This isn't the type of bike share system I want to see, but it is a step sort of in that direction. It's limited to SIUE people though. :? That's no good. It can surely be expanded though given the will and a bit of money. I'm sure given the number of people like me out there the downtown bike station could easily have a few bikes donated for this purpose. Hopefully after that we could graduate from the 20th century person-to-person renting sytem with papers and what not and into something more Bixi-like.

84
New MemberNew Member
84

PostMay 27, 2010#27

One thing that both transit and the regional bike plan have to account for is providing access to recreation through transit. I think having the multi-modal center (Amtrak/Greyhound/MetroLink) helps with that a lot. I can hop a train for the wilds of Missouri with my bike and spend a weekend biking & camping without needing a car. I can hop a train (or the Megabus) to Chicago. It would be nice to serve Lone Elk Park, for example. But there's also corporate car share and, increasingly, peer-to-peer car share, so not everything has to be solved by a big program.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostMay 27, 2010#28

Won't the I-44 BRT eventually take us to Lone Elk Park? (can you bike in there???)

I'm not seeking a 'big program,' just compatibility. I'd like to be able to use public bikes anywhere I go. I want to get off Amtrak in Jeff City, grab a bike, and head off for the Katy Trail and maybe drop the bike off later in Warrensburg or even KC. It is totally fine if everybody has a small system as long as they cooperate. It's like the library. I'm fine with libraries having different funding sources and districts, but I'm very irritated that I have to have multiple cards and I can't even use libraries in other cities because I don't live there.

I talked to SIUE. Their 30 bike program cost $10,000 and is electronic. It isn't believed possible to expand off campus or outside of Illinois.

PostMay 31, 2010#29

Check out this massive bicycle parking garage planned for Philadelphia,
http://inhabitat.com/2010/05/27/philade ... ing-oasis/

Could something like this be built on top of a metrolink station? Most metrolink stations are depressed a bit below street grade. I can imagine this at Delmar station easily. It could fully shelter both platforms from the rain.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJun 01, 2010#30

^ But why would a huge bike parking garage be needed at the Delmar Station?

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostJun 01, 2010#31

We should build it at Delmar because it would allow visibility and a new entrance from the street itself. If the loop is to expand past the station, people need a reason to cross the street, and the old building above the station is too nice not to be used.



It doesn't have to be primarily a bike parking garage. It could be half garage, half awesome TOD retail with the metrolink station as the courtyard. There's a very popular art space in Seoul called Ssamzie which is essentially a big spiraling square. They often hang art work in the open space. I was there on Sunday and noticed the railings had lots of trailing vines hanging off of them.





This is very compatible with the 'cycling oasis' planned for Philly. Bikes and a walkway on the outside, shops on the inside, or the reverse. More than a courtyard, there would also be the ability to look out over the city. After a few stories, the view of forest park would start to emerge.

I don't think it matters where you put it. If we had a massive bike garage with shower facilities, it would be an attraction in and of itself. You could commute by bike to any metrolink station, get off in the loop, shower and park your bike, and then ride on to work clean and refreshed. The general rule with bike facilities is that when they are there, people magically show up to use them.


Most Metrolink stations are below the street level. Maybe Forest Park station makes mroe sense. Tie it together with the St. Vincent Greenway and the massive park and the bike parking is justified. Tie it to the loop trolley and two metrolink lines, and it seems quite central. Add the TOD already planned adjacent and tie it all together in one pretty TIGER application, and we might have a winner.

466
Full MemberFull Member
466

PostJun 01, 2010#32

http://www.bcycle.com/home.aspx

this is the program that is used here in denver. i didn't know that it was a nation wide organization. it took years to get this set up and it's city wide. there is a rack at every light rail station that is with-in the city and quite a few strategically placed else where.

there is a section for "who wants it more" where you can vote for your city for it to come to next. at the moment it looks like topeka ks wants it the most.

but i think first, there needs to be a bike policy in place. bike st louis is great, and the complete streets bill is also a great step in the right direction, but we need to make the destination bike friendly, not just the route to get there. that needs to be done before we can have a bike sharing program.

the other thing i see with this is, really, who will use it? if i need a bike, i'll use my own. that is going to be the sentiment with most local people. the tourist, maybe, but unless you know the city very well, i'd wager that a tourist will opt for a cab.

84
New MemberNew Member
84

PostJun 01, 2010#33

I agree that there has to be coordination. There is no sense at all in starting a bunch of different programs that don't work seamlessly together.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostJun 02, 2010#34

I would use it for all the reasons mentioned before.

You don't always have your bike nearby. In fact, as you read this consider how long it would take you to get to your bike. Maybe it is nearby, maybe it is on the other side of the city.

What's a more effective use of money? A bike share program or the Loop Trolley. How long does it take to get from UCity library to Forest Park Station by bike? You could take any route. Maybe you go Skinker to Lindell. Which program is easier to expand to the Central West End? Think about all the reasons you might use the streetcar, and I bet the bikes would serve the same purpose. (Handicap riders aside)

The same is true of SLU kids that need to get back and forth between the campuses and are afraid of taking the bus. I have and will happily walk from Grand Station to the Fox before waiting around for a bus. If there was a bike sitting there that I could take a mile up the road and then ditch, I'd certainly take it.

PostJun 24, 2010#35

Bike sharing has spread to Chicago.

They're going with the B-Cycle model. Remember you can vote on their website. Columbia is doing better than St. Louis, so maybe we could vote for them.

PostJul 17, 2010#36


PostJul 31, 2010#37

Chicago's bike share program is up and running. Hopefully it will be successful and spread along Amtrak to us. :D

205
Junior MemberJunior Member
205

PostAug 03, 2010#38

I, too, would love to see bike sharing extend to STL. One place I think it could be huge is forest park. If you've ever walked there, you know that it takes some time to walk from the edge of the park to the many attractions within. If there were a few bike sharing facilities strategically placed at the edges and at each destination, I think they'd be very well used. And they'd alleviate some of the parking problems.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostAug 04, 2010#39

^It's central and three greenways intersect there. You're absolutely right. A pilot program just putting racks at the attractions and the edges of the park would need to be expanded to meet demand. The zoo and the art museum would probably need capacity for dozens of bikes.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 05, 2010#40

Tea-bagger in Denver comes out AGAINST bike sharing. :roll:

http://www.denverpost.com/election2010/ci_15673894

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostAug 11, 2010#41

^Guess who won the GOP primary for Colorado Governor last night?

Yep, the very same tea bagger who thinks bike sharing is a UN conspiracy.

Jeez, who will the tea party put up next? Dale Gribble from "King of the Hill"?

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostAug 23, 2010#42

Bicycling Magazine had an article a while back called Thanks for Sharing which had the following to say,
"Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a big show of bicycles at the conventions--like a thousand of them?" said consultant Leslie Bohm, brainstorming at a 2008 board meeting of Bikes Belong, the Colorado-based advocacy organization. The Democratic and Republican national conventions, to be held in Denver and St. Paul, Minnesota, were about three months away.
Two conventions were held, and now two cities have successful bike sharing programs.
It worked so well, in fact, that Bikes Belong plans on repeating the project at the 2012 conventions.
The question now is which city will step up next... The smart money may go to Phoenix and St. Louis--the leading contenders for the 2012 Democratic and Republican conventions.

Also, the latest bike sharing musings from the TransportPolitic suggest that Barcelona's beach clustering problem would be a bigger deal in most American cities where everyone rushes downtown in the mornings and back to the burbs at night. Because American jobs are less evenly distributed around our cities, we might have logistics problems with our bike sharing programs. London is used as an example.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 23, 2010#43

The interesting thing in STL is that nearly all the Arch grounds designs call for bike rental stations - in the meantime, planning is very far along towards getting a bike commuter station downtown...seems as though these functions should be combined to create critical mass.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostAug 24, 2010#44

Well, if we're picked for the DNC, we should find out if Bikes Belong has plans for us.

PostDec 27, 2010#45

Didn't see this before, but if Charlotte wins the nomination bike sharing is on the table,
http://www.wcnc.com/news/local/Conventi ... 16963.html

PostJan 21, 2011#46

Bike Sharing has hit the UrbanStl blog! Nice. :D All we need are two stations smartly placed along a high-frequency route, and we can grow from there.

The Wash U Medical Center has a massive plaza next to a MetroLink station that has been systematically designed to be empty (note the walkways above and the dark pool of nothingness in the middle). There are several spots there that would easily fit a bike sharing station, protected from the rain too. Put one there.

Put the second one either,
a) Euclid and Maryland.
b) somewhere in Forest Park like the Art Museum.
c) down Tower Grove Avenue somewhere. Grove, MoBot, Tower Grove Park, Arsenal and Morganford, wherever. Anybody that uses that street regularly knows there are hundreds of Tower Grove Southers that work in the Central West End and ride their bikes back and forth.
d) the Danforth Campus

Wash U, Forest Park Forever, the ZMD institutions, and the various hospitals all have large enough budgets for a couple bike sharing stations each. Expansion along MetroLink stations and Bike St. Louis routes would take more time and money, but can only happen if a strong central cluster of stations proves the usefulness of the program.

Why the edges of Forest Park instead of downtown? That's where the money and users are. That's where expansion can happen most easily in any number of directions.

PostFeb 25, 2011#47

Anybody know about Wash U's Green Bike Program?

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostJun 11, 2012#48

Bike sharing make be coming to Columbus, OH: Downtown may offer bicycles to rent
Columbus officials are considering placing bicycles for rent at locations Downtown, in surrounding districts and possibly around Ohio State University.

With a credit-card swipe and an hourly, daily or yearly charge, users could grab a bike at one spot and drop it off at another. (Bring your own helmet, though.)

Bike-share programs already are in place in Chicago, Washington, Denver and other cities and are coming soon to New York, San Francisco and Portland, Ore.

Columbus Recreation and Parks Director Alan McKnight said the city is looking to Minneapolis as a model. There, it costs $6 a day or $65 a year to rent one of 1,200 bikes at any of 116 stations.

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJun 11, 2012#49

Again, if the 3/16th sales tax increase passes this coming April... Great Rivers Greenway and the city should explore bike sharing in high volume areas! Expand Bike St. Louis and partner with Metro to make stops more accessible!!! This can totally! Maybe a pilot program in Forest Park???

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJun 11, 2012#50

^ They could explore it, maybe - doesn't make the 3/16th sales tax a good idea in any way. GRG "could" explore this today. In fact, they "could" make the argument that they would like to do bike sharing and therefor need additional sales tax revenue...but they're not.

Read more posts (38 remaining)