I'm glad they're trying to maintain height; this site fills a gaping hole in the skyline. Original render:
![]()

PROJECT SUMMARY
300 South Broadway will be a 32 Floor apartment
tower at the corner of Clark and Broadway in Downtown
St. Louis. It will have views into Busch Stadium
and of the surrounding area. The tower will top out at
337 feet tall and will be 10 feet taller than the neighboring
One Cardinal Way tower at Ballpark Village.
This building replaces a late 1800s structure that
was formerly home to St. Louis Community College.
300 South Broadway will be the third tallest Residential
Building in the City upon its completion in late
2020. HDA is the architect for the project. We have
promoted concrete construction to HDA over the
years and they have advised us that the building will
utilize concrete construction when it is built. We calculate
around 42,000 cubic yards of concrete will be
used on this project.
The last time I talked to the team was a few weeks ago. They aren't sure about what to do at this point. And several buyers are supposedly stepping up for the existing building creating a competition of sorts price wise, but I haven't seen any sign of that. So we will see.
I can say that the buyer isn't from the old team but the tower is being tossed around as a possibility. More to come!chriss752 wrote:I’ve contacted some people and know of some things. What I learned was that the new building was back in the picture but it was really vague. There are other details, just I'll wait.
Even a residential rehab of this building would not be a loss.chriss752 wrote:I can say that the buyer isn't from the new team but the tower is being tossed around as a possibility. More to come!chriss752 wrote:I’ve contacted some people and know of some things. What I learned was that the new building was back in the picture but it was really vague. There are other details, just I'll wait.
So the buyer still has no idea what they plan on doing with this building/land?chriss752 wrote:I can say that the buyer isn't from the old team but the tower is being tossed around as a possibility. More to come!chriss752 wrote:I’ve contacted some people and know of some things. What I learned was that the new building was back in the picture but it was really vague. There are other details, just I'll wait.
I think it's more likely that us UrbanSTLers don't have any idea what they want to do with it. My guess is those that have the building under contract have some ideas, or they likely wouldn't have put it under contract. Chris isn't at liberty to give too many details on what he's heard yet so until then we'll have to wait and see.John Coctostan wrote:So the buyer still has no idea what they plan on doing with this building/land?chriss752 wrote:I can say that the buyer isn't from the old team but the tower is being tossed around as a possibility. More to come!chriss752 wrote:I’ve contacted some people and know of some things. What I learned was that the new building was back in the picture but it was really vague. There are other details, just I'll wait.
Agree.The Mayor wrote:I think it's more likely that us UrbanSTLers don't have any idea what they want to do with it. My guess is those that have the building under contract have some ideas, or they likely wouldn't have put it under contract. Chris isn't at liberty to give too many details on what he's heard yet so until then we'll have to wait and see.John Coctostan wrote:So the buyer still has no idea what they plan on doing with this building/land?chriss752 wrote:
I can say that the buyer isn't from the old team but the tower is being tossed around as a possibility. More to come!
Hopefully it's another tower proposal somewhat close to the last one...
I don't know who has the building under contract, do you? It could very well be one of the owners of the surrounding properties.chaifetz10 wrote: In a vacuum, yes. But we have to keep in mind that those properties are owned by others. Its not as easy as just partnering with those owners or purchasing that land.
They had it worked out where it would've worked just fine without acquiring a neighboring building. As seen in the attached photos, the new building would fit onto the same site as the existing building and would make parking and other things work as well.urbanitas wrote:^It isn't going to be easy to build a high-rise on this site, either, unless the developers acquire and demo one of the adjacent buildings from GlaxoSmith.
If the parking lot owner South of here was willing to sell all or a portion of the site, that would be the case. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening until parking lot profitability comes down. There was a discussion on this earlier on in this thread.Elek.borrelli wrote:For the love of god, please convert this into lofts/ hotel instead of demolishing it. There is a massive lot just South on Broadway with equally good views into the stadium and of the arch. It would just be ridiculous to tear this piece of history down for a tower that could instead fill up an empty lot 100 meters away. All they have to do is cut holes for new windows, add street-level retail, remodel the interior, and sort out parking situation for future residents then bam you have yourself a smart, urban conscious development.
