1,794
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,794

PostMar 15, 2025#1301

It’s pretty clear that people (on this board) decided that 300K was some magic #. It’s not. Also we know the census #s shouldn’t be trusted

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostMar 16, 2025#1302

^Seconded.

917

PostMay 15, 2025#1303

We already knew St. Louis lost population but today other cities (that are not counties) got released, and it appears that we are the anomaly. After a lot of major cities outside of Texas, NC and Florida have taken dips in population since COVID, cities all over the place are rebounding with population gains. Even cities like Chicago and Columbus that have shown some of the poorest job growth jumped in numbers. We are unfortunately on a short list this time of cities that lost population

62
New MemberNew Member
62

PostMay 15, 2025#1304

Cue the business journal article in 3....2.....1

473
Full MemberFull Member
473

PostMay 15, 2025#1305

delmar2debaliviere2downtown wrote:
May 15, 2025
We already knew St. Louis lost population but today other cities (that are not counties) got released, and it appears that we are the anomaly. After a lot of major cities outside of Texas, NC and Florida took dips in population since COVID, cities all over the place are rebounding with population gains. Even cities like Chicago and Columbus that have shown some of the poorest job growth jumped in numbers. We are unfortunately on a short list this time of cities that lost population
City pop or metro?

9,539
Life MemberLife Member
9,539

PostMay 15, 2025#1306

Census est. for cities population comes out today, the number for STL
City is the same as few months ago when the counties est. came out (since STL city is a county too) but if the city methodology was applied to STL city, it would show 4000-5000 more people than county formula

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostMay 16, 2025#1307

The only headlines I've seen regarding new census estimates are speculation that Chicago could be nudged out of 3rd place by Houston in coming years.

PostMay 16, 2025#1308

Oh. And also that Jacksonville and Fort Worth both crossed over the 1 million mark.

That Ft. Worth has joined that club is just mind boggling.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMay 16, 2025#1309

Baltimore Jack wrote:
May 16, 2025
The only headlines I've seen regarding new census estimates are speculation that Chicago could be nudged out of 3rd place by Houston in coming years.
It helps that Houston is 665 sq mi.

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostMay 16, 2025#1310

Oh sure. Even Los Angeles--the poster child of autocentric sprawl-- feels dense compared to the 80% of Houston that's outside the inner belt.

2,425
Life MemberLife Member
2,425

PostMay 16, 2025#1311

Even Cleveland gained city population according to the latest census estimates, meaning that St. Louis is the only 1 million+ metro in the midwest that saw a continued decline in city population. Not good.  The state of Missouri isn't helping.

985
Super MemberSuper Member
985

PostMay 16, 2025#1312

Isn't there some methodology concerns in the estimates that work against St. Louis favor? Mainly relates to its political status as independent city and demolition of residences are factored in, even if they have been vacant for many years or even decades? Since isn't the number of households higher?

9,539
Life MemberLife Member
9,539

PostMay 16, 2025#1313

^ yes,  if you factor that is, the city added 1000-1200 people 

977
Super MemberSuper Member
977

PostMay 16, 2025#1314

dbInSouthCity wrote:^ yes,  if you factor that is, the city added 1000-1200 people 
I understand how that methodology can lead to undercounting the absolute population number. I’m not sure I am tracking with why that would lead to an undercounting of the population change. Wouldn’t that methodology have the same effect in the old and new number?

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostMay 16, 2025#1315

stlgasm wrote:
May 16, 2025
Even Cleveland gained city population according to the latest census estimates, meaning that St. Louis is the only 1 million+ metro in the midwest that saw a continued decline in city population. Not good.  The state of Missouri isn't helping.
The state is actively working against it's metropolitan regions for political reasons. They know a healthy, growing St. Louis or Kansas City changes the politics of the state drastically in 10-20 years. We're already seeing it in states like North Carolina, Georgia, etc. Virginia used to be a conservative state and it's no longer even competitive on the national level. Could you imagine if St. Louis was growing like Nashville or Charlotte? That would flip the state.

2,674
Life MemberLife Member
2,674

PostMay 16, 2025#1316

If you want to stabilize population, fix SLPS and build more single family housing. That doesn’t mean writing more money for a school district that is rapidly losing students. It means closing underperforming schools so that the full classrooms are receiving the highest quality resources. There shouldn’t be a classroom with fewer than 20 students.

The transportation debacle would be enough to take me (and my hypothetical children) out of the city.

431
Full MemberFull Member
431

PostMay 16, 2025#1317

imperialmog wrote:
May 16, 2025
Isn't there some methodology concerns in the estimates that work against St. Louis favor? Mainly relates to its political status as independent city and demolition of residences are factored in, even if they have been vacant for many years or even decades? Since isn't the number of households higher?
There could me more households and still fewer people, which makes total sense given steady declines in family formation and childbirth, i.e., single and DINK households replacing multi-child family households.

We need to accept that the City has not hit rock-bottom in terms of population, and that the State will continue acting against us (and the feds will be neutral at-best) barring some unforeseen rupture in the two-party system. 

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostMay 16, 2025#1318

addxb2 wrote:
May 16, 2025
If you want to stabilize population, fix SLPS and build more single family housing. That doesn’t mean writing more money for a school district that is rapidly losing students. It means closing underperforming schools so that the full classrooms are receiving the highest quality resources. There shouldn’t be a classroom with fewer than 20 students.

The transportation debacle would be enough to take me (and my hypothetical children) out of the city.
You can't "fix" slps. SLPS is a result of bigger societal factors.

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostMay 16, 2025#1319

goat314 wrote:
May 16, 2025
addxb2 wrote:
May 16, 2025
If you want to stabilize population, fix SLPS and build more single family housing. That doesn’t mean writing more money for a school district that is rapidly losing students. It means closing underperforming schools so that the full classrooms are receiving the highest quality resources. There shouldn’t be a classroom with fewer than 20 students.

The transportation debacle would be enough to take me (and my hypothetical children) out of the city.
You can't "fix" slps. SLPS is a result of bigger societal factors.
Yea most of SLPS' problems aren't actually SLPS' fault. They're largely the reality that 85% of their students are impoverished and some 20% are homeless. There's very little SLPS or even the city can do about this.

9,539
Life MemberLife Member
9,539

PostMay 16, 2025#1320

SLPS has excellent case studies in its district that shows it can provide a high quality education in a controlled environment- see Metro HS, McKinley HS

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostMay 17, 2025#1321

imperialmog wrote:
May 16, 2025
Isn't there some methodology concerns in the estimates that work against St. Louis favor? Mainly relates to its political status as independent city and demolition of residences are factored in, even if they have been vacant for many years or even decades? Since isn't the number of households higher?
My understanding is that the Census Bureau utilizes changes in housing units as a key component of Sub-County (cities, villages, etc.) population estimates but not for County and County equivalents like STL CIty, where Natural Change (Births - Deaths) + Migration (Domestic and International) is utilized. IRS, Medicare and Social Security data, etc. are key sources for migration.

We can challenge our population estimate, but I don't think demolitions and other changes in housing unit estimates affect population estimates here like they do in Detroit, e.g., which successfully challenged population on that basis. (Looking at past challenges, I see Cook County was accepted but that's the only County I see, fwiw.)

PostMay 17, 2025#1322

County Housing Unit Estimates (July 1, 2024) were released Thursday; reflects construction permits issued in 2023 (as it assumes a lag between issuance and completion).  STL City was basically static (slight drop of about 100 units) after seeing an increase during the building boom the prior few years.  We could see a more significant drop for next year due to yesterday's devastation. 

As mentioned in my post above, these housing unit changes shouldn't impact our city population estimates (at least to the same extent as they would if we were a just a city) due to differences in Census methodology. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 02, 2025#1323

StlToday - St. Louis has lost residents for decades. The tornado could nudge more to leave.
ST. LOUIS — The sounds of nail guns and roofing hammers echoed through the neighborhood as Lisa Mannery surveyed the impassible pile of branches stacked in her backyard. An HVAC unit hung precariously from the roof of the still-closed Save A Lot on Natural Bridge Avenue behind her house.
Her roof, like many others nearby, was covered by a blue tarp, though she’s able to stay in her home as she sorts through insurance and contractors.
But many of Mannery’s neighbors are living elsewhere while their homes are repaired.
Several doors down, Vickii Grady said she will be staying elsewhere as she awaits fixes to her home. Another resident, David Jackson, said he’s seen more than few U-Haul trucks in the two weeks since a tornado carved a path of destruction through St. Louis, killing five and significantly damaging nearly 2,500 buildings.


The brunt of the storm fell on north St. Louis, already weighed down with a long decline in population and the resulting vacancy and associated problems. But the block of San Francisco Avenue near Natural Bridge and Newstead avenues where Mannery lives was mostly intact, and she is confident that her neighbors will rebuild and return to what she said is a tight-knit community.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 2fde9.html

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostJun 02, 2025#1324

^or it could lead to reinvestment and population increase in those neighborhoods.

Gaslight Square got Kickstarted after the 1959 tornado.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 23, 2025#1325

StlToday - ‘We are in trouble.’ St. Louis region’s slowing population growth spurs call for action


https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/met ... urce=login

Read more posts (36 remaining)