6,155
Life MemberLife Member
6,155

PostMay 24, 2019#26

urbanitas wrote: ^As are their architecture, design, and urban planning track records.  

On the plus side, SLU is second-to-none in terms of stimulating the demolition, asphalt laying, and grass cutting industries in our fair city.

 
What is the visual demonstration suggesting that SLU is turning over a new leaf?  Proof positive that it has not would be this building coming down for a parking lot, or for anything really.
There is no proof. I'm not convinced they have. But I've heard the rumors. And they've at least built some halfway interesting things lately, and planned others. There's been more rehab around them, for which they may or more likely may not deserve any credit. I'm just suggesting KansasCitian's surprise is defensible.

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostMay 24, 2019#27

Eventually, I guess we can expect to see a continuous block-wide swath of grass along the east side of Grand, with a parallel swath of asphalt or parking garage, all the way from Doisy Research Center to the SALUS Center.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostMay 27, 2019#28

I know it’s a long shot but maybe, just maybe, a preservationist developer could come forward and talk SSM out of demolition. I’m sure if a developer gave them a decent amount of money to but it, SSM would accept the offer.


6,155
Life MemberLife Member
6,155

PostMay 27, 2019#29

^I very much suspect buildings that are further gone have been brought back from the brink. I'd be quite surprised if that's in worse shape than the Sun, the Continental, or even the Medinah. I've no doubt it would take a significant investment, but that would surely be a desirable location for apartments and maybe a little bit of the right street level retail.

1,308
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,308

PostMay 27, 2019#30

FWIW, I took some pictures of the side of the building facing our parking lot last week. It's a side not a whole lot of people have seen, I presume, and the photos show a lot of the storm damage debris still within the cordoned off area (in fact, I'm fairly certain stuff is still falling off the building). I'll reiterate that I believe the fencing seems too temporary for an imminent demo (not that I don't think SSM has moved on from those plans), and I think it's primarily there for legal/safety reasons as I'm sure SSM doesn't want the negative publicity and guaranteed lawsuit from a building they own pulling a Pyrrhus of Epirus and hitting someone in the head with a chunk of roof. 






For good measure, I took a picture of the permit that's posted on the fence today. The length of time (185 days) doesn't seem like long enough to do a demo to me if they actually do have asbestos issues as serious as they claim. 


6,155
Life MemberLife Member
6,155

PostMay 27, 2019#31

There was a wall collapse at the Continental, but it wasn't visible from the street. (Third or fourth floor, an large exterior wall in what I understand was a cafeteria had collapsed onto an adjoining rooftop terrace. Which causes me to think at a glance it was probably the sixth floor.) Literally half the proscenium in the Sun had fallen into the seats. There were stairs so chocked with plaster and debris they were impassable. And you had to step carefully on the stage to avoid falling into the basement. (Downstage left was perilous and we had it informally marked off for that reason. "Don't go past the door laying there.") Some of the structural engineers that did walkthroughs suggested that it was the weight of the facade that had helped to hold it in place. That all looks like bricks dropping from the parapet, right? I can't really see where they're coming from, so I'm kind of just guessing. I'll take your word for it that it's in rough shape, but if that's a steel frame structure, and I'd guess that it is, even if a portion of a brick wall had fallen down it wouldn't necessarily mean the building itself was compromised. All depends how the ironwork is holding up.

. . . anyway, I wish there were a way to help nudge SSM in a better direction.

1,308
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,308

PostMay 27, 2019#32

symphonicpoet wrote:  That all looks like bricks dropping from the parapet, right? I can't really see where they're coming from, so I'm kind of just guessing. I'll take your word for it that it's in rough shape, but if that's a steel frame structure, and I'd guess that it is, even if a portion of a brick wall had fallen down it wouldn't necessarily mean the building itself was compromised. All depends how the ironwork is holding up.
Yeah that's all brick work, plaster, and roofing/insulation there. The frame and overall structure of the building is fine (I assume), but the facade is pretty crumbly after the storm, and that's the main safety issue they're dealing with, I think. Interior's in pretty rough shape, allegedly, but I very much doubt it's unsalvageable - buildings in a lot worse shape regularly get fixed up. 

I have no idea why SSM wants parking here though, even temporarily, when SLU owns two rather large, decrepit grass fields just a few hundred feet down Park that are either adjacent to or across the street from existing SSM parking. It'd make much more sense to pave those, if they absolutely "must" have more parking, since they could attach the one to the existing lot and easily add more shuttle stops to both.

They wouldn't even be able to fit an extremely large building (big enough to be of any use for hospital purposes, anyway) on 1504's lot either, unless they built upwards. 

EDIT: There's actually three large grass fields down Park they could use instead (really though, in a perfect world, the two lots on the north side of Park would, and should, all be residential infill). 

536
Senior MemberSenior Member
536

PostMay 27, 2019#33

***** slu and all their cronies for destroying the heart of our great city

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostMay 28, 2019#34

FWIW, Superior Waterproofing is on that blocking permit, and they are not a demolition company. They do a lot of big masonry restoration and repair projects. That could be a good sign.

1,308
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,308

PostJun 26, 2019#35

Hmm. Overheard my managers talking about an engineer coming in to look at the roof of our building in preparation for the demolition of 1500 S Grand. Seems like its life may yet be coming to a undignified end, unfortunately.

680
Senior MemberSenior Member
680

PostJun 26, 2019#36

If only buildings could be moved affordably. I'm sure the Steelcote developer wouldn't mind adding this handsome 5-story building to his budding district over there.

678
Senior MemberSenior Member
678

PostJun 26, 2019#37

This building is great there. So much potential for this strip of Grand but absolutely no vision.

680
Senior MemberSenior Member
680

PostJun 26, 2019#38

^ I totally agree. I'm just saying that it would be fantastic if buildings worth saving (but that are instead going to be torn down by their irresponsible property owners) could be relocated to areas where they would actually be loved and cared for.

2,041
Life MemberLife Member
2,041

PostJun 30, 2019#39

Some info I am regrettably privy to: Cardinal Glennon is apparently in rough shape financially, and is going through another round of cost cutting, eliminating a number of jobs and closing down several departments and terminating contracts. I sadly have a family member losing her job as confirmation of this. so I wouldn't expect them to be able to come up with money for much of anything at this point.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 30, 2019#40

Maybe sell it then

1,308
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,308

PostJul 01, 2019#41

Ebsy wrote: Some info I am regrettably privy to: Cardinal Glennon is apparently in rough shape financially, and is going through another round of cost cutting, eliminating a number of jobs and closing down several departments and terminating contracts. I sadly have a family member losing her job as confirmation of this. so I wouldn't expect them to be able to come up with money for much of anything at this point.
I had heard a similar comment not too long ago from the parents of a friend, both of whom work at Barnes. Wasn't sure if it was just grapevine hearsay at BJC, so I never shared. Sounds like it's confirmed, then.

They absolutely should sell, if they're that desperate - dunno why it seems like they're hell-bent on going through with the demo. 

1,689
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,689

PostJul 01, 2019#42

quincunx wrote: Maybe sell it then
This is a hot take here.

Nah, let's spend the money on demo, paving, and painting.  That's how you save money.  -_-

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostJul 02, 2019#43

quincunx wrote: Maybe sell it then
Unfortunately, if they were to sell it as is, SLU would likely be the buyer, as they own the property across Park Ave.  That would certainly seal this building's fate.

Also, Cardinal Glennon owns the rest of the property on this block along Park Ave.  They probably believe that demolishing this building and packaging it with the other properties will "add value".

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJul 02, 2019#44

There’s also different buckets of money in play. I’ll have to look up the actual owner, but SSM Health St. Louis almost certainly owns the building and not CG (even though they are really one and the same). CG cost cutting is probably targeted towards short term financial stability while this building property is a budgeted long term piece for SSM.

678
Senior MemberSenior Member
678

PostJul 02, 2019#45

Pathetic. Ya kinda figured this kind of sh*t would happen when they gave them full control.

6,155
Life MemberLife Member
6,155

PostJul 02, 2019#46

^Note my comments elsewhere about the new (honorary) street address: 1500 South Fr. Biondi S J Way. Yeesh!

18
New MemberNew Member
18

PostJul 02, 2019#47

The administration president of CG said at one of the town meetings that they cannot find a buyer for this property because it is in terrible shape due to years of neglect of the previous owner.

So it Is not SSM (or SLU's) fault that this building is falling apart and will become yet another beautiful parking lot addition to Biondi Way.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostJul 02, 2019#48

dtwest wrote: The administration president of CG said at one of the town meetings that they cannot find a buyer for this property because it is in terrible shape due to years of neglect of the previous owner.

So it Is not SSM (or SLU's) fault that this building is falling apart and will become yet another beautiful parking lot addition to Biondi Way.
if the previous owner left it in such terrible shape, and CG/SSM/SLU/whoever knew that, then why did they buy it? that scenario makes no sense. buildings in MUCH worse shape have been rehabbed. my guess is the "administration president" is full of sh*t and it was always their intention to tear it down and land bank it. they're just hoping to avoid another Pevely situation.

18
New MemberNew Member
18

PostJul 02, 2019#49

Not just that, but how is it possible there is no one interested in buying this property? This IS one of the fastest growing neighborhoods, in the middle of the south campus, next to two hospitals, Iron Hill, etc., etc. I think the problem is that they actually don’t really want to sell it but just keep the parcel. I wonder if they announce anywhere that this property is on sale…

1,308
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,308

PostJul 04, 2019#50

It's not even that big of a lot; it wouldn't add that much parking. It seems like a trash reason to tear it down.

Read more posts (90 remaining)