Tapatalk

Stock responses to STL Today.com Commenters

Stock responses to STL Today.com Commenters

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 12, 2009#1

While I do not take stories of crime in the city lightly, neither do I enjoy reading ridiculous comments about how the city is one big "ghetto" or "pre-ghetto" as one commenter said. Racism, classism, and presuming the city is bad as a whole hamper efforts to better the crime situation.



Ideally, these comments would be better moderated. Some think they should be shut off altogether.



For now, they're here and I think we should respond.



Given that by the fifth comment on the site, someone will undoubtedly say: "I don't know why anyone remains in the city; it's one big ghetto controlled by thugs. I remember when it used to be white and safe.",



...we should develop stock responses that can simply be copied and pasted from this topic in order to save all of us time.



Can you give your best stock response?

PostOct 12, 2009#2

In case you lack inspiration, here is the latest. Surely it must be satire. I fear not.


stxman51 October 12, 2009 10:03AM CST

I'm glad I live 50 miles from the murder capital of Missouri. I don't even like driving thru your stinkin' city. The people who think their little piece of heaven is safe are living in fanasty land. It's only a matter of time before the dead bodies start showing up on your sidewalk. Why do you think so many people are moving out of St.Louis? Houses 4 feet away from each other that all look alike. Sometimes when the wind is blowing just right it brings the stench of St.Louis our way.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 12, 2009#3

I'm not sure why these nut jobs even feel the need to comment. A person who lives 50 miles outside of the city obviously doesn't care much about it, so why comment?

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 12, 2009#4

I suppose the best stock response is the shortest and sweetest:


"You have no idea what you're talking about."

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostOct 12, 2009#5

The question is, do these people actually live 50 miles out of the city, or do they just get some perverse satisfaction from putting down the city even if the live nearby, or in the city itself?

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostOct 12, 2009#6

Among the standard commenters on STLToday there seems to be bragging rights for being



1. the most anti-city

2. owning the most weapons and having the most CCW permits

3. being the most anti-Obama, anti-Democratic Party

4. supposedly never ever benefiting from a govt. program

5. whining the most when the "liberal rag" based in downtown STL occasionally deletes one of your posts for being blatantly racist, off topic, etc. even though dozens of others almost as bad made it through.

200
Junior MemberJunior Member
200

PostOct 12, 2009#7

I actually do have a stock response, I may just have to jump on there right now.

470
Full MemberFull Member
470

PostOct 12, 2009#8

They are just looking to validate their decision to live in little boxes made of ticky tacky.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 12, 2009#9

Nice idea. I would love for there to be a stock response that a lot of us could use to show that there is organized, persistent support for living in the city and not just one or two feeble (however well-reasoned) responses. We should overwhelmed them.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 12, 2009#10

Grover wrote:Nice idea. I would love for there to be a stock response that a lot of us could use to show that there is organized, persistent support for living in the city and not just one or two feeble (however well-reasoned) responses. We should overwhelmed them.


Are you thinking we should all use the same response? That could be great.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 12, 2009#11

Sure. This wouldn't work, but I feel like posting:



I'm white. I'm married. I have a daughter. Neither I nor anyone in my family has been shot, assaulted or robbed. Our home and cars have not been broken into. We walk and take MetroLink to work, walk to Forest Park, walk to dozens of unique restuarants and shops and in the time we do not spend mowing a too-large yard or driving to a store or work or school we spend time with our friends and neighbors.



Alternatively, we could post a response EVERY SINGLE TIME anything bad happens outside the city. Murder, robbery, car wreck, you-name-it. "Glad I live in the City and avoided X."

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 12, 2009#12

We need to come up with a fake acronym/citizens group. This fake group will have a constitution whose articles can be cited.



For example, the group could be Citizens Opposed to Posting Stupidity. Stltoday.com COPS.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 13, 2009#13

Why not City Residents Against Posting from the Suburbs = CRAPS





Edit: OK, I shouldn't really make this about the city v. suburbs.....



City Residents Against Posting Stupidity

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostOct 13, 2009#14

St. Louis' Up-lifting Tenants... or SLUT.



Let's see how long we can keep this game up!

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostOct 13, 2009#15

Don't

Overexaggerate

Urban

Crime

Happenings

Electronically

2,938
Life MemberLife Member
2,938

PostOct 13, 2009#16

The only issue with solidarity is that it begs mockingbird reflexes in these simpletons (bird brains?), to which they'd try to take whatever's posted and bastardize it into something strictly negative. Still, that's no reason to not do it. Acting in unison may separate their collectivized identities rather than galvanize them.



Keep rotating them, and we could have them against the fences.



1. Serious answer - Any one of us who posts there finishes with:

THE CITY IS BACK! or BACK THE CITY!



2. Alternatively,

KEEP THE REDNECKS IN THE STICKS



3. Start all your posts with "The Flying Spaghetti Monster teaches us that..."



4. Agitate. Just start quoting Billy Madison lines until they feel no morale in trying to reply. There's only so long these idiots can argue "The city is full of nothing but crime and scum" when the only reply they get is "TAFFY IS DELICIOUS" or "SHAMPOO IS BETTER - I GO ON FIRST AND CLEAN THE HAIR!"

557
Senior MemberSenior Member
557

PostOct 13, 2009#17

BL211 wrote:They are just looking to validate their decision to live in little boxes made of ticky tacky.


Now that song is in my head. Curse you. :)

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostOct 13, 2009#18

I wonder if those people realize that without the city there would be no Cardinals, no Blues, no Rams, no Art Museum, no World Class zoo, No Forest Park, no Mardi Gras, No FOX Theater, no City Museum, no History Museum, etc. Without the city there would be no Italian restaurants on the Hill. There would be no Soulard Farmer's Market. Most of St. Louis' culture is in the city. Of course, there's University City. But that's "touching the line."



I get to St. Louis a few times a year and I probably know as much about the city as half the people that comment there. I know I love the city. There's just a feeling in the city of energy and people doing stuff. I know that sounds weird, but here, in the middle of the night, you get a feeling that you're the only awake person within a 15 mile radius.



These posters on STLToday are unfortunately amazing. Their purposeful ignorance can be astounding. Do these people realize that if there had been no St. Louis city, then they would have nothing to run away from?



I love the city lights. Where I live, other than street lights, everything shuts down at 9.



The suburbs have a purpose. And I can see people moving there for schools and such. But the city doesn't seem to be that terrible. I'm sure the city still has great neighbors. I'm sure the city still has many of the things that the suburbs, too. Sure, the city has some abandoned buildings (how many of course depends on the neighborhood). But the buildings in the city (at least most I've seen) are built to last. Most of the newer buildings in the suburbs seem to be built cheaply, with no long-term plans.



Just my $.02.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostOct 13, 2009#19

Matt Drops The H wrote:For example, the group could be Citizens Opposed to Posting Stupidity. Stltoday.com COPS.


There are a lot of great suggestions in this thread, but this one is my favorite since we have to "police" those forums on a regular basis.



BTW, nice job of completely dismantling the anti-city wingnuts in the comments section following the article about the multiple homicides on Sunday.



Notice how very few people that posted comments actually acknowledged the tragedies within the article and immediately started ranting against city living? It only highlights their ignorance and indifference. We may never change their minds, as they are too narrow and/or too small, but we can work to put a stop to the never-ending anti-city drivel by continuously countering this nonsense. I also think it's important to focus on pointing out the positive aspects of city living, i.e., don't stoop to the level of these people by denigrating suburban living.



Personally, I've learned to ignore this stuff and I rarely comment on anything I read on StLtoday.com no matter how much it may offend me, but I'm glad there are some of you that are in the habit of eloquently dismantling these vacuous and pointless anti-city tirades.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostOct 13, 2009#20

Can you imagine how much fun it is to try to moderate those blogs and forums? It just reinforces my faith in human nature. 8)

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostOct 13, 2009#21

bonwich wrote:Can you imagine how much fun it is to try to moderate those blogs and forums? It just reinforces my faith in human nature. 8)


No, Joe, I cannot imagine. 8)



The only way I can maintain faith in human nature after sifting through the STLtoday.com rubbish is by telling myself for every person that says something so ignorant, there are at least one hundred people, maybe more, that don't share their narrow-minded views or their pessimistic outlook on life. I think Greg Freeman's Front Porch proved years ago that city and suburban dwellers alike can be passionate about St. Louis, and most of the time, they can even get along quite well. 8)

396
Full MemberFull Member
396

PostOct 13, 2009#22

I enjoyed looking through the comments today and seeing all the city lovers take on the trash talk. We need to SICK EM when they post and take over those posts!



Citizens

Interested

In

City



Empowerment

Multiplied



CIIC EM (Sick Em) :D

137
Junior MemberJunior Member
137

PostOct 14, 2009#23

MidcoastSTL wrote:I enjoyed looking through the comments today and seeing all the city lovers take on the trash talk. We need to SICK EM when they post and take over those posts!



Citizens

Interested

In

City



Empowerment

Multiplied



CIIC EM (Sick Em) :D


:lol: I like it!

390
Full MemberFull Member
390

PostOct 15, 2009#24

I love living in the city. Hate going out of the city. Think twice before I go to the county.



But surely you do understand that there is a ghetto element in the city. That's not poor people. That's not black people. That is trashy people --thugs, pimps 'n hos & wannabes and yes they do hang out at Schnuck's Lindell and pretty much ruined Schnucks Grand/Gravois for me. And I'm not a real picky person.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 15, 2009#25

Really GE? That seems disingenuous - "not poor," "not black," but "trashy." How many rich white "thugs, pimps 'n hos & wannabes" do you know? I've shopped at the Lindell Schnuck's regularly for five years and never once has anyone either prevented me from purchasing what's on my list or threatened to take anything from me that I had purchased. I'm not sure how else anyone would ruin my shopping trip.

Read more posts (181 remaining)