557
Senior MemberSenior Member
557

PostOct 23, 2009#406

Moorlander wrote:developers and financing in place to begin a $220 million overhaul after a three-year delay. On tap is a movie theater, up to 100,000 square feet of retail space, 750 parking spaces, 205 apartments, an Embassy Suites hotel and several new office tenants, including law firm Lewis, Rice & Fingersh and accounting firm LarsonAllen.



http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory1.html


Movie theater! YES YES YES YES. I know, ridiculous, but that's very exciting for me.



...now if someone would open the one at Union Station we'd be in business.



I'm not as negative on this entire development as I was. If this is all really going to happen, that's great.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostOct 24, 2009#407

The movie theater in that location has been planned for a long time. Glad the project is back on.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostOct 25, 2009#408

Name one parking garage ever converted to residential in St. Louis.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostOct 25, 2009#409

The problem with converting a parking garage is that the designs don't usually work for conversion due to short ceilings or angled floors. In the case of St. Louis Centre, I think a garage as one component is OK. Certainly, the current plan is not quite as exciting as the original plan, but in general it is OK. We need to see some renderings and layout plans.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostOct 25, 2009#410

^How is the garage component OK?

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostOct 26, 2009#411

Doug wrote:^How is the garage component OK?


I'm like you- doubtful- at least until I see some renderings.



This is the Show-Me State after all, right? 8)

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 27, 2009#412

One thing that makes the garage component OK is the fact that it is helping to get this project moving again.

39
New MemberNew Member
39

PostOct 27, 2009#413

It will be interesting to see what type of retail they are looking to put in these spots. I know when Mercantile Exchange was full throttle, the hopes (at least mine) were around getting some good local/national stores...I hope we can get some quality retail in this area that somewhat resembles what they were planning to do with Mercantile Exchange. I'm also hoping the development continues South on Broadway...there are a couple great and abondoned buildings that are prime for rehab and I'm sick of looking at cracked out buildings outside my living room window!

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 06, 2009#414

Good article in this morning's P-D:



Link

200
Junior MemberJunior Member
200

PostNov 06, 2009#415

Looks like a good time to start the STL Comments stock responses

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostNov 06, 2009#416

I am beginning to think it's time for stltoday to remove the comments portion of it's website. Mindless drawl is just taking up their bandwidth. It's seriously like listening in to a creative writing session for character dialogue in the movie "Idiocracy."

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 06, 2009#417

^ Or they could do what CNN does. Real names and faces -> Accountability -> More civil behavior

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostNov 06, 2009#418

The rendering:




142
Junior MemberJunior Member
142

PostNov 06, 2009#419

The PD published a rendering of this development on their Building Blocks blog this afternoon:







For more information, go to http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/buildi ... is-centre/

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostNov 06, 2009#420

^ HA!

142
Junior MemberJunior Member
142

PostNov 06, 2009#421

Sorry for the double post!

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostNov 06, 2009#422

Could be a lot worse than that. Nothing groundbreaking, but decent enough. What really disappoints me is the sidewalk will still be covered. I know the columns are structural, but I really wish they were getting tucked back into the proper building line.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 06, 2009#423

MattnSTL wrote:Could be a lot worse than that. Nothing groundbreaking, but decent enough. What really disappoints me is the sidewalk will still be covered. I know the columns are structural, but I really wish they were getting tucked back into the proper building line.


True. The Washington side will be much improved though. It looks like the entry at 7th Street will be built out toward the sidewalk, which will definitely be better.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 06, 2009#424

You know Matt, some street narrowing could provide an expanded sidewalk with non-covered strolling space.

1,137
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,137

PostNov 06, 2009#425

So..... I have not seen any specifics, so will ask. Has all the financing been put in place, or is this still contingent on that (aka...is this just a pipe dream right now)?

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostNov 06, 2009#426

JMedwick wrote:You know Matt, some street narrowing could provide an expanded sidewalk with non-covered strolling space.


I considered that, but it doesn't seem like it is going to happen. I would like to see 2 way traffic along 7th.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 06, 2009#427

^ Just depends on what the City values more, additional sidewalk space or the potential on-street parking in front of the businesses. Given that we are talking about St. Louis, the on-street parking would probably be more valuable. As for narrowing streets, I would think you could do it along 6th and maybe one side of 7th (with all of those garages along 7th, it is one street downtown that may need travel lanes).

3,557
Life MemberLife Member
3,557

PostNov 06, 2009#428

RENDERINGS!!!!!!!!!!!



This look is very new to St. Louis. I would like to see more advertising in downtown. As long as its done in a tasteful way.




5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostNov 06, 2009#429

Finally, we've got a rendering! That took long enough. I was beginning to think the renderings were guarded more carefully than Dick Cheney's whereabouts between 2001 and 2008. :wink:



Overall it looks better than I expected. I could really do without the "Park" sign, since I think the ramps are going to make that one pretty obvious just as they are pretty obvious on at least one-third of the structures in downtown. And I hope the glass is heavily tinted to block the view of the cars inside as much as possible.



What's still missing is anything resembling a timeline, or any firm commitments for what will go in the space. Obviously I didn't expect the latter news for some time now, but in today's article the movie theater "might" be part of the plan. So even that is not a sure thing.



Once again, we are settling for less. I am trying really hard to be positive about this- hopefully the developer will do a far better job of attracting retailers to the ground floor than many developers downtown have done so far. And despite the fact that chain retailers and restaurants as a group have taken a serious beating around here lately, I think this is the perfect spot for a concentration of chains, and their presence should help Macy's as well.

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostNov 07, 2009#430

Would you rather have that above, or what's currently there?



I for one am ok with it for sure. Especially if they get good tenants!

Read more posts (729 remaining)