Tapatalk

Where We Stand: Transportation 2015 update

Where We Stand: Transportation 2015 update

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostJul 30, 2015#1

http://www.ewgateway.org/pdffiles/libra ... tation.pdf

How is Oklahoma City (most auto centric city with virtually no transit) kicking our ass and almost everyone elses in growth

1970 368,164 13.5%
1980 404,014 9.7%
1990 444,719 10.1%
2000 506,132 13.8%
2010 579,999 14.6%
2014 620,602 7.0%

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 30, 2015#2

^ probably b/c of the energy sector... that growth may or may not last.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostJul 30, 2015#3

OKC might also be benefiting from A/C.

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostJul 30, 2015#4

roger wyoming II wrote:^ probably b/c of the energy sector... that growth may or may not last.
The economy of Oklahoma City, once just a regional power center of government and energy exploration, has since diversified to include the sectors of information technology, services, health services and administration.


As of July 2014, the top fifteen employers in the city were (with the number of employees in parentheses):[70]

State of Oklahoma (46,900)
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center (7,500)
Integris Health (6,000)
City of Oklahoma City (4,840)
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (5,000)
Hobby Lobby Stores (5,100)
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (3,500)
Mercy Health Center (4,300)
OG+E Energy Corp (3,400)
Devon Energy Corporation (3,200)
SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc. (3,100)
AT&T (3,000)
OU Medical Center (3,200)
Sonic Corp. (2,000)
LSB Industries, Inc. (1,880)

Other major corporations with a large presence (over 1000 employees) in Oklahoma City include: Dell, The Hertz Corporation, United Parcel Service, Farmers Insurance Group, Great Plains Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Cox Communications, The Boeing Company, Deaconess Hospital, Johnson Controls, MidFirst Bank, American Fidelity Assurance, Rose State College, and Continental Resources

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 30, 2015#5

^ Holy crap, Hobby Lobby has over 5,000 workers in OKC! I think it is Gary K who also has posted on some good downtown planning they've done over the past decade or two that has helped grow it into something a bit more than a tumbleweed.... it would be interesting to see how much of OKC's jobs density is concentrated in the Greater Downtown core.

Also, it is much easier to reach those kind of growth rates when you're essentially a cow pasture with a clean slate than an already large, urbanized metro. We need transit expansion not so much to achieve platinum-level growth rates but to connect people, many whom can't afford autos, to jobs more quickly and to redevelop our core and recenter a sprawled region.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 30, 2015#6

Helps to have 607 sq mi to grow into. OKC is 42% of its metro population. Having the state capital there helps too in terms of job obviously but also in terms of the state government caring more about the issues of the city since they are actually in it. The more everyone is on the same team the better.

Their city council only has 8 members. How do they do it?!

989
Super MemberSuper Member
989

PostJul 30, 2015#7

^ Basically its more centralized in local government structure. Also size and proportionwise it is the equivalent to a combined city/county, but with all of it developable unlike a sizable portion of St. Louis County due to terrain (not a bad thing, since it also means preservation of nature and quick escapes to it)

St. Louis regional government is a Byzantine structure combined with the fractionalism of the later Holy Roman Empire.

Also not OKC also not too far from it has the Flagship public university. (Though is Norman considered part of its metro?) There also could be synergy in growth due to proximity to Texas. One issue I wondered with St. Louis is although its closer to the sun belt than almost any Midwest metro area, it doesn't benefit from it since the part that is closest is the most economically depressed part of it.