Tapatalk

Waterhouse to restore preservation review for the 24th Ward

Waterhouse to restore preservation review for the 24th Ward

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJan 04, 2006#1

Waterhouse to restore preservation review

Shawn Clubb

Of the Suburban Journals

Southwest City Journal

01/04/2006



New 24th Ward Alderman Bill Waterhouse promised to restore preservation review for the ward in his election campaign and now he plans to follow it up.



Waterhouse said he is currently working on legislation that would have the city's Preservation Review Board consider any proposal that would call for demolition of a historic structure. The ward's former alderman, Tom Bauer, removed much of the ward from preservation review.



"The importance of this is it is the only protection a building has. If you have a landlord or owner who wants to get rid of, for whatever reason, a piece of our history, someone has to speak up for this history and this is what the preservation review does," he said. "During the review, an intelligent decision will be made on what will and can be done with the property."



Patrick Schneider, a resident of Dogtown in the 24th ward, said he fought in the 1970s to keep buildings in the Gaslight Square area from being torn down. He said he is concerned by what developers can do if they have free reign over historic properties.



"Losing some of these architectural buildings, the cottages, the neighborhoods, the businesses, it loses its character when you lose these buildings in this area here," Schneider said.



Schneider said he was upset when Bauer took the ward out of preservation review. He said he will be glad to see it reinstated



Read More

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostJan 04, 2006#2

Further down in the article is insight into Waterhouse's potentially NIMBY perspective:


Waterhouse said he doesn't know if restoring the ward to the preservation review district would affect the planned demolition of the church, but he doesn't believe it would.



"I sort of doubt it, but wouldn't it be nice," Waterhouse said. "I don't believe that wrecking this church is in the best interest of the neighborhood. I would like to hear from both sides, the developers and the neighborhood and the preservation review district, so this can be handled correctly."


The church in this quote is the one in Clifton Heights at the northwest corner of Columbia-Southwest-Clifton, slated to be demolished for six new townhomes. Townhomes are already located across Clifton from this site, and across Southwest is mixed use commercial with residential above, clearly not a single-family intersection.



Bauer was recalled for his arrogance and excessive use of incentives, but the man was certainly pro-development. Hopefully, Waterhouse won't mean an end to Dogtown/Clifton Heights renaissance by now taking the side of anti-density southside NIMBYs on future proposals. Of immediate concern, Waterhouse apparently in his quote already thinks it would be nice to revisit past decisions.