St Louis Galleria Mall

464
Full MemberFull Member

PostOct 29, 2025#1

Galleria looking to unload 6 acres of surface parking, providing potential for development. 

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/bus ... -top-story

1,846
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off

PostOct 29, 2025#2

I can’t believe it took so long for them to market these unutilized parking lots. Every mall in the metro (and many strip malls) should consider the same.

409
Full MemberFull Member

PostOct 29, 2025#3

I can't view it.  I'm assuming this is the far lot on the corner by 64?  No idea on the math, but if they added a couple levels to the parking garage in the back, they could probably sell off even more of the parking in front.

464
Full MemberFull Member

PostOct 29, 2025#4

EssTeeEll wrote: ↑
Oct 29, 2025
I can't view it.  I'm assuming this is the far lot on the corner by 64?  No idea on the math, but if they added a couple levels to the parking garage in the back, they could probably sell off even more of the parking in front.
Correct. It's the extreme outer southern lot area. Where all the circusy stuff is always being put on.

PostOct 29, 2025#5

EssTeeEll wrote: ↑
Oct 29, 2025
I can't view it.  I'm assuming this is the far lot on the corner by 64?  No idea on the math, but if they added a couple levels to the parking garage in the back, they could probably sell off even more of the parking in front.
These 2 shots are from the Richmond Heights Future Comprehensive Plan. To give idea of what sort of scale is preferred for this land.
image (1).webp (589.22KiB)

image.webp (958.5KiB)

7,947
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 29, 2025#6

I'm old enough to have worked at the Galleria when
  • holiday season employee parking was off-site up at Enterprise's HQ
  • even the furthest reaches of that "lower" parking lot was used during the holidays and even normal season weekends.

471
Full MemberFull Member

PostOct 29, 2025#7

I'm old enough to have spent many hours hanging out on Antler Ave (where these new bldgs will be built) before the mall was developed.

.

790
Super MemberSuper Member

PostOct 29, 2025#8

I posted this news a few months ago. They have definitive interest. It’s going to be great, possibly transformative for that area.

2,732
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 29, 2025#9

There is a world where a development here would tie perfectly into The Boulevard phase 3 where the Waterway is

790
Super MemberSuper Member

PostOct 29, 2025#10

Think Vitra/Keystone on steroids.

1,846
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off

PostOct 30, 2025#11

You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks

1,186
Expert MemberExpert Member

PostOct 30, 2025#12

Maybe an unpopular opinion but I'd like to see a different land use built up to a highway (interchange) than residential mixed use. I just don't think that'd be a nice place to live, and it frankly bothers me how much residential investment is going in right up to highway 40.

Maybe a hotel or industrial use could go in here.

790
Super MemberSuper Member

PostOct 30, 2025#13

JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
Talk about nothing to add. Ha!

How sad and unfulfilling your life must be. No faith, family or kids. Good luck dude.

7,947
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 30, 2025#14

Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 

994
Super MemberSuper Member

PostOct 30, 2025#15

dweebe wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 
That is correct.

7,947
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 30, 2025#16

Debaliviere91 wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
dweebe wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 
That is correct.
I wonder how they'll react to more apartments in their district?

464
Full MemberFull Member

PostOct 30, 2025#17

JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
?? Did I miss something? What warranted this remark. I'm confused...

994
Super MemberSuper Member

PostOct 30, 2025#18

SRQ2STL wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
?? Did I miss something? What warranted this remark. I'm confused...
Best to ignore it.

2,260
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 30, 2025#19

SRQ2STL wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
?? Did I miss something? What warranted this remark. I'm confused...
WitherSTL

8,934
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 30, 2025#20

Debaliviere91 wrote:
dweebe wrote: ↑
Oct 30, 2025
Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 
That is correct.
Is this mentioned in the article? The Galleria is boarded by Clayton and Ladue School district maps but neither includes the Galleria.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 30, 2025#21

Galletia South Parcel.png (332.56KiB)

8,934
Life MemberLife Member

PostOct 30, 2025#22

^ Nice find. Thanks!

1,513
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted

PostOct 31, 2025#23


1,043
Expert MemberExpert Member

Post4:41 AM - May 20#24

https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... fault.html

Galleria is running imminent risk of defaulting on its loan, lender says

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


Post1:01 AM - 1 day ago#25

https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news/2026/09/22/store-moves-galleria-west-county-clothing-store.html

Urban Outfitters has closed at the Galleria and re-opened at West County Center.

This leaves a pretty prominent vacancy at the Galleria in which the BJ article has no information on what will end up happening to it, unlike Nordstroms, which had a pretty immediate tenant to fill the space.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


Read more posts (13 remaining)