Tapatalk

St Louis Galleria Mall

St Louis Galleria Mall

406
Full MemberFull Member
406

PostOct 29, 2025#1

Galleria looking to unload 6 acres of surface parking, providing potential for development. 

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/bus ... -top-story

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostOct 29, 2025#2

I can’t believe it took so long for them to market these unutilized parking lots. Every mall in the metro (and many strip malls) should consider the same.

405
Full MemberFull Member
405

PostOct 29, 2025#3

I can't view it.  I'm assuming this is the far lot on the corner by 64?  No idea on the math, but if they added a couple levels to the parking garage in the back, they could probably sell off even more of the parking in front.

406
Full MemberFull Member
406

PostOct 29, 2025#4

EssTeeEll wrote:
Oct 29, 2025
I can't view it.  I'm assuming this is the far lot on the corner by 64?  No idea on the math, but if they added a couple levels to the parking garage in the back, they could probably sell off even more of the parking in front.
Correct. It's the extreme outer southern lot area. Where all the circusy stuff is always being put on.

PostOct 29, 2025#5

EssTeeEll wrote:
Oct 29, 2025
I can't view it.  I'm assuming this is the far lot on the corner by 64?  No idea on the math, but if they added a couple levels to the parking garage in the back, they could probably sell off even more of the parking in front.
These 2 shots are from the Richmond Heights Future Comprehensive Plan. To give idea of what sort of scale is preferred for this land.
image (1).webp (589.22KiB)

image.webp (958.5KiB)

7,799
Life MemberLife Member
7,799

PostOct 29, 2025#6

I'm old enough to have worked at the Galleria when
  • holiday season employee parking was off-site up at Enterprise's HQ
  • even the furthest reaches of that "lower" parking lot was used during the holidays and even normal season weekends.

466
Full MemberFull Member
466

PostOct 29, 2025#7

I'm old enough to have spent many hours hanging out on Antler Ave (where these new bldgs will be built) before the mall was developed.

.

732
Senior MemberSenior Member
732

PostOct 29, 2025#8

I posted this news a few months ago. They have definitive interest. It’s going to be great, possibly transformative for that area.

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

PostOct 29, 2025#9

There is a world where a development here would tie perfectly into The Boulevard phase 3 where the Waterway is

732
Senior MemberSenior Member
732

PostOct 29, 2025#10

Think Vitra/Keystone on steroids.

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostOct 30, 2025#11

You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks

1,092
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,092

PostOct 30, 2025#12

Maybe an unpopular opinion but I'd like to see a different land use built up to a highway (interchange) than residential mixed use. I just don't think that'd be a nice place to live, and it frankly bothers me how much residential investment is going in right up to highway 40.

Maybe a hotel or industrial use could go in here.

732
Senior MemberSenior Member
732

PostOct 30, 2025#13

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
Talk about nothing to add. Ha!

How sad and unfulfilling your life must be. No faith, family or kids. Good luck dude.

7,799
Life MemberLife Member
7,799

PostOct 30, 2025#14

Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 

975
Super MemberSuper Member
975

PostOct 30, 2025#15

dweebe wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 
That is correct.

7,799
Life MemberLife Member
7,799

PostOct 30, 2025#16

Debaliviere91 wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
dweebe wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 
That is correct.
I wonder how they'll react to more apartments in their district?

406
Full MemberFull Member
406

PostOct 30, 2025#17

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
?? Did I miss something? What warranted this remark. I'm confused...

975
Super MemberSuper Member
975

PostOct 30, 2025#18

SRQ2STL wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
?? Did I miss something? What warranted this remark. I'm confused...
Best to ignore it.

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostOct 30, 2025#19

SRQ2STL wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
You’re a bigot with nothing to add. Thanks
?? Did I miss something? What warranted this remark. I'm confused...
WitherSTL

8,904
Life MemberLife Member
8,904

PostOct 30, 2025#20

Debaliviere91 wrote:
dweebe wrote:
Oct 30, 2025
Just for clarification can someone confirm this parcel is Richmond Heights, but is in the Clayton School District? 
That is correct.
Is this mentioned in the article? The Galleria is boarded by Clayton and Ladue School district maps but neither includes the Galleria.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 30, 2025#21

Galletia South Parcel.png (332.56KiB)

8,904
Life MemberLife Member
8,904

PostOct 30, 2025#22

^ Nice find. Thanks!

1,510
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,510

PostOct 31, 2025#23