993
Super MemberSuper Member
993

PostFeb 08, 2016#76

Makes me wonder if failure is the only option and could be in part by design. Mess things up on purpose and then say government is the problem in order to justify less government and more tax cuts.

1,540
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,540

PostNov 18, 2016#77

Nice article on Great Streets for Gravois - In Affton

http://www.websterkirkwoodtimes.com/Art ... treet.html

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 14, 2025#78

StlToday - Group bike ride on Gravois Avenue seeks to call attention to traffic violence

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/cri ... 05d64.html

6,176
Life MemberLife Member
6,176

Post4:40 AM - Feb 18#79

Sounds like MODoT is holding an open house on a Gravois project March 3 from 4-7 pm at the Five Star Senior Center 2832 Arsenal. I don't know a thing about this project, but judging from MODoT's past projects they need all the input we can give them. Here's the post article on it, but there's not much there apart from the notice.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/met ... b899b.html

1,882
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,882

Post2:34 PM - Feb 18#80

symphonicpoet wrote:
4:40 AM - Feb 18
Sounds like MODoT is holding an open house on a Gravois project March 3 from 4-7 pm at the Five Star Senior Center 2832 Arsenal. I don't know a thing about this project, but judging from MODoT's past projects they need all the input we can give them. Here's the post article on it, but there's not much there apart from the notice.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/met ... b899b.html
Here's the MoDot notification: https://www.modot.org/node/83520

And of note:
For those who are unable to attend the meeting in person, the information shared during the meeting as well as a survey form will be available at Missouri Route 30 (Gravois) Pavement Resurfacing and Safety Improvements in St. Louis City | Missouri Department of Transportation on the day of the meeting. People are welcome to view the information and provide comments about the project until Tuesday, March 17.


And a link to the Project main page: https://www.modot.org/projects/missouri ... louis-city

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post6:39 PM - Jun 13#81

View From The Lou - MoDOT finally wrote down the reason Gravois stays dangerous.

https://viewfromthelou.substack.com/p/m ... the-reason

278
Full MemberFull Member
278

Post8:31 PM - Jun 13#82

 MoDOT finally wrote down the reason Gravois stays dangerous. TY I wondered why it was so wide 

1,663
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,663

Post12:20 PM - Jun 14#83

St. Louis failed in spectacular fashion on every single urban planning decision over the last 100 years. You would think there would be at least one urban planning success story just by accident but, no, every single urban planning decision was a huge spectacular failure with massive negative ramifications. Some could conclude that "urban planning" destroyed the city.

890
Super MemberSuper Member
890

Post12:28 PM - Jun 14#84

Ah yea, MoDOT, famously controlled by St. Louis.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


1,663
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,663

Post12:41 PM - Jun 14#85

Yeah yeah. I'm talking about everything in its entirety, the interstates, the failed subway plans, public housing, the Arch (I consider the Arch grounds an urban planning failure), bridges (last 100 years only), and despite it all if you squint and look past a few major flaws it's still pretty damn nice.

890
Super MemberSuper Member
890

Post2:43 PM - Jun 14#86

leeharveyawesome wrote:Yeah yeah. I'm talking about everything in its entirety, the interstates, the failed subway plans, public housing, the Arch (I consider the Arch grounds an urban planning failure), bridges (last 100 years only), and despite it all if you squint and look past a few major flaws it's still pretty damn nice.
I consider your entire ideology an urban planning disaster.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


985
Super MemberSuper Member
985

Post3:11 PM - Jun 14#87


537
Senior MemberSenior Member
537

Post3:46 AM - Jun 15#88

leeharveyawesome wrote:
12:20 PM - Jun 14
St. Louis failed in spectacular fashion on every single urban planning decision over the last 100 years. You would think there would be at least one urban planning success story just by accident but, no, every single urban planning decision was a huge spectacular failure with massive negative ramifications. Some could conclude that "urban planning" destroyed the city.
We were pretty ahead on Metrolink and Historic Tax Credits. But since those were tiny victories compared to the potential of what they could've been with real leadership....I'll 100% agree with you. 

1,001
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,001

Post4:59 AM - Jun 15#89

StL made some good urban planning/revival decisions in the 80s but that’s been about the only period where the city has looked like it may make a dramatic comeback since the 1950s decline. I think a lot of that progress was halted quickly by how much crime escalated in all cities in the US in the early 90s and the narratives around it

There have been small victories but we need huge swings and home runs. I am growing severely concerned where our population in the city has hit and continues to decline at one of the fastest rate in the nation since COVID, together with the county’s population wall and metro east continued decline. The other peers and cities that struggled with decline seems to now be recovering or at least have stopped th COVID drain

StL sq miles is small but we are approaching the population of cities and suburbs that do not have near the economic prowess but we can’t seem to retain residents


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2,094
Life MemberLife Member
2,094

Post9:07 PM - Jun 30#90


116
Junior MemberJunior Member
116

Post4:07 PM - 26 days ago#91

Thanks for sharing. It's not perfect, but it's certainly a start. I'd do anything for protected bike lanes on Gravois, given its connectivity to so many walkable/bikeable neighborhoods... but like I said, great to see progress! Thanks to the mayor and alderwoman for prioritizing this

2,094
Life MemberLife Member
2,094

Post4:13 PM - 26 days ago#92

jtlq53 wrote:
4:07 PM - 26 days ago
Thanks for sharing. It's not perfect, but it's certainly a start. I'd do anything for protected bike lanes on Gravois, given its connectivity to so many walkable/bikeable neighborhoods... but like I said, great to see progress! Thanks to the mayor and alderwoman for prioritizing this
Agreed - I think sometimes we'd definitely like to see big changes, and sometimes its okay to be happy with baby-steps or even regular steps toward progress! :) 

479
Full MemberFull Member
479

Post10:03 PM - 10 days ago#93

I don't know if any of you ride buses from hampton transit center at hampton and gravois but that transit center is the most dangerous and convoluted transit center to access. Pedestrian signals don't work on westbound gravois and the transit center is located inside schnucks parking lot and the only way you can reach it, if you are a pedestrian, is via germania.

For context, I have been riding buses for over 20 years. All the other transit centers are easily accessible except for this one. What an irony that pedestrians cannot access it.

1,161
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,161

Post11:15 PM - 10 days ago#94

^Yeah that's not great, I've not utilized that transit center before. Its in kind of an odd location, other than the Schnucks its not really near anything important, I imagine they just put it there as a place for the City bus routes (30, 90) to turn around. 

890
Super MemberSuper Member
890

Post11:31 PM - 10 days ago#95

This corner has been a transit center for like 100 years. Multiple streetcars used to turn around there, it's only natural that it is still a transit center.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


1,001
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,001

Post11:41 PM - 10 days ago#96

Gravois/Hampton should be great corridors in the city but they are just car sewers unfortunately. This particular intersection is a little held back by the massive cemetery. I still wish we could think of Light Rail on Gravois

I also wish we had a big master plan for the River Des Peres. The Greenway is a nice feature now, but we can make much more of it

Wilmore Park is very underutilized and forgotten as a city park but it’s nice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3,580
Life MemberLife Member
3,580

Post2:14 AM - 10 days ago#97

Was a planted median too much to ask for? 

890
Super MemberSuper Member
890

Post3:05 AM - 9 days ago#98

delmar2debaliviere2downtown wrote:Gravois/Hampton should be great corridors in the city but they are just car sewers unfortunately. This particular intersection is a little held back by the massive cemetery. I still wish we could think of Light Rail on Gravois

I also wish we had a big master plan for the River Des Peres. The Greenway is a nice feature now, but we can make much more of it

Wilmore Park is very underutilized and forgotten as a city park but it’s nice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hampton from Nottingham to Loughborough is pretty good.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


567
Senior MemberSenior Member
567

Post5:25 AM - 9 days ago#99

goat314 wrote:
2:14 AM - 10 days ago
Was a planted median too much to ask for? 
In MoDOT’s view, yes. Granted the ones they put on Natural Bridge next to Fairgrounds park have grass, but the remainder up there are concrete.

2,686
Life MemberLife Member
2,686

Post1:55 PM - 7 days ago#100

A pedestrian died after being struck by a car on Saturday morning at Gravois and Ohio. Currently when you press the beg button to cross there it takes as long as SEVEN MINUTES for the signal to change (tested yesterday)

Read more posts (2 remaining)