3,450
Life MemberLife Member
3,450

Post6:08 PM - 4 days ago#226

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:WFA, Ameren and Purina are nice to have DT from a stats padding and earnings tax perspective but their campuses promote DT’s empty and unsafe vibes. They’re parking demands, particularly WFA and Purina, will never permit the City to stitch its near south and west sides back into a cohesive urban fabric.
I could see Ameren and Purina moving HQs into the new Millennium towers with that great view of the Arch. Just as Emerson moved into new class A offices in Clayton. Hope the Millennium development starts our own South Bay boom like Boston where every metro company wants a presence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

681
Senior MemberSenior Member
681

Post6:59 PM - 4 days ago#227

Ameren just spent 60 million dollars updating their HQ, and it is adjacent to much of their fleet and equipment storage and other associated facilities. They're not going anywhere unless they decide to downsize. Many of their employees are WFH 3+ days per week.

541
Senior MemberSenior Member
541

Post8:13 PM - 4 days ago#228

Playing musical chairs with companies like Wells Fargo, Purina and Ameren just makes the St. Louis office and building vacancy problem worse. Moving from perfectly usable buildings into something new just to be in downtown proper isn’t a smart move. And the Wells Fargo campus is so large that getting that redeveloped would take decades. Everyone here wants new businesses to move to downtown and laments when a business leaves downtown to another area of the city.

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post9:34 PM - 4 days ago#229

By "perfectly usable buildings" Chris means mostly parking lots and green space that you only see in the urban core of St. Louis.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


4,009
Life MemberLife Member
4,009

Post9:44 PM - 4 days ago#230

gary kreie wrote:
6:08 PM - 4 days ago
JaneJacobsGhost wrote:WFA, Ameren and Purina are nice to have DT from a stats padding and earnings tax perspective but their campuses promote  DT’s empty and unsafe vibes. They’re parking demands, particularly WFA and Purina, will never permit the City to stitch its near south and west sides back into a cohesive urban fabric.
I could see Ameren and Purina moving HQs into the new Millennium towers with that great view of the Arch. Just as Emerson moved into new class A offices in Clayton. Hope the Millennium development starts our own South Bay boom like Boston where every metro company wants a presence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would Purina move with the plant, etc they have on their current campus? Not sure it would make sense to vacate any of what they have to move into the heart of downtown, at least from their perspective

541
Senior MemberSenior Member
541

Post10:04 PM - 4 days ago#231

StlAlex wrote:
9:34 PM - 4 days ago
By "perfectly usable buildings" Chris means mostly parking lots and green space that you only see in the urban core of St. Louis.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
So I’m wrong is what you’re saying? Millions of square feet of office space, that’s in use, but because there’s parking it all needs to be vacated and become an eyesore that won’t be dealt with for decades. Makes perfect sense.

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post10:19 PM - 4 days ago#232

Chris Stritzel wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
9:34 PM - 4 days ago
By "perfectly usable buildings" Chris means mostly parking lots and green space that you only see in the urban core of St. Louis.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
So I’m wrong is what you’re saying? Millions of square feet of office space, that’s in use, but because there’s parking it all needs to be vacated and become an eyesore that won’t be dealt with for decades. Makes perfect sense.
I literally can't imagine pretending STL wouldn't be way better off with upwards of 10,000 more workers in the core of downtown because already blighted suburban campuses that are mostly parking as is would be vacant and up for redevelopment into something more useful than parking lots and grass.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


541
Senior MemberSenior Member
541

Post10:43 PM - 4 days ago#233

StlAlex wrote:
10:19 PM - 4 days ago
Chris Stritzel wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
9:34 PM - 4 days ago
By "perfectly usable buildings" Chris means mostly parking lots and green space that you only see in the urban core of St. Louis.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
So I’m wrong is what you’re saying? Millions of square feet of office space, that’s in use, but because there’s parking it all needs to be vacated and become an eyesore that won’t be dealt with for decades. Makes perfect sense.
I literally can't imagine pretending STL wouldn't be way better off with upwards of 10,000 more workers in the core of downtown because already blighted suburban campuses that are mostly parking as is would be vacant and up for redevelopment into something more useful than parking lots and grass.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I literally can’t imagine pretending that St. Louis has such high demand for any kind of development that it could successfully redevelop all of this land in a decent amount of time. More employees in downtown is a good thing, but I’d rather those employees be brand new to the region and not just being moved from the periphery of downtown.

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post11:06 PM - 4 days ago#234

Chris Stritzel wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
10:19 PM - 4 days ago
Chris Stritzel wrote: So I’m wrong is what you’re saying? Millions of square feet of office space, that’s in use, but because there’s parking it all needs to be vacated and become an eyesore that won’t be dealt with for decades. Makes perfect sense.
I literally can't imagine pretending STL wouldn't be way better off with upwards of 10,000 more workers in the core of downtown because already blighted suburban campuses that are mostly parking as is would be vacant and up for redevelopment into something more useful than parking lots and grass.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I literally can’t imagine pretending that St. Louis has such high demand for any kind of development that it could successfully redevelop all of this land in a decent amount of time. More employees in downtown is a good thing, but I’d rather those employees be brand new to the region and not just being moved from the periphery of downtown.
Lucky for you, well more than half of that land is already LITERALLY JUST PARKING LOTS AND GRASS. They may as well be abandoned right now.

And downtown isn't getting 10k new workers from out of the city, which is why we need to better leverage what is already here. Same reason the city needs to vacate that horrid at 1520 Market and move to the other side of Tucker.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


5,722
Life MemberLife Member
5,722

Post4:11 AM - 4 days ago#235

This whole discussion seems like nonsense to me.  Reality is these companies aren't going to pick up and move mere blocks so the focus is how to get them to expand and improve their campus, get them more connected. 

I would also argue having Wells Fargo campus where it is and next to Harris Stowe campus is a great anchor for west downtown.  It is how the city can encourage and get WF to add more people while pushing for more infill development and growing Harris Stowe.  Getting the AHM timber breaking ground would be great but the whole area just simply getting mixed use infill, rowhouses, and townhomes w some well built & designed pockets parks only make things better.

City has some great north south corridors to build on from Broadway to Jefferson to Grand to Hampton.     What to improve and how can you leverage Purina, WF and to lesser extent Ameren to make them better.  

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post5:41 AM - 4 days ago#236

dredger wrote:This whole discussion seems like nonsense to me.  Reality is these companies aren't going to pick up and move mere blocks so the focus is how to get them to expand and improve their campus, get them more connected. 

I would also argue having Wells Fargo campus where it is and next to Harris Stowe campus is a great anchor for west downtown.  It is how the city can encourage and get WF to add more people while pushing for more infill development and growing Harris Stowe.  Getting the AHM timber breaking ground would be great but the whole area just simply getting mixed use infill, rowhouses, and townhomes w some well built & designed pockets parks only make things better.

City has some great north south corridors to build on from Broadway to Jefferson to Grand to Hampton.     What to improve and how can you leverage Purina, WF and to lesser extent Ameren to make them better.  
You're right, let's just keep hoping and praying these suburban campuses magicaly spur urban redevelopment and stop being a blight on the city. It's not like all of them have been around for 30+ years, I'm sure that development is right around the corner.

Remember in 2012 when the city and state dished out money to WFA to renovate hundreds of thousands of square feet of office space at this dogshit campus that minimally boosts downtown's economy? And now the city is giving a hefty tax break for a high end hotel that WFA wants because there's no high end hotels near their campus, because their campus is on the edge of downtown far away from the amenities of downtown, like high end hotels?

Nonsense to me is the city shelling out tax breaks for an on-campus hotel because WFA chooses to be located in an area far away from hotels but they aren't quite willing to actually pay for the hotel. I doubt you could find a city quite as cucked as St. Louis is, but I guess everyone is so numbed to it you somehow twist your brain into thinking this is all normal.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post12:54 PM - 3 days ago#237

Alex, what color is the sky in your world? 

2,796
Life MemberLife Member
2,796

Post1:50 PM - 3 days ago#238

dredger wrote:This whole discussion seems like nonsense to me.  
UrbanSTL the last two years.

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post3:09 PM - 3 days ago#239

framer wrote:Alex, what color is the sky in your world? 
The audacity💀💀💀💀

My world is a world where the cancerous suburban office campuses that currently litter downtown are actually a horrible use of land and provide minimal ulterior benefits to the city while being active detriments in several ways. And STL would be significantly better off with these companies located in the core of downtown, accessible to transit, generating foot traffic, and boosting downtown business, and it is in the city's best interest to pursue that.

But instead, the city is helping subsidize a luxary hotel because their suburban fortress isn't nearby any hotels.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


244
Junior MemberJunior Member
244

Post4:13 AM - 3 days ago#240

drive by today 06202026 saw large earth-moving equipment moving earth

1,690
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,690

Post1:57 PM - 2 days ago#241

Purina also is undergoing an entire facelift of the lobby.  I don't see them moving ever.  But in the Purina thread there were hints at further investment outside of their current campus.

1,816
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,816

Post3:15 PM - 2 days ago#242

StLAlex’s point that we’re subsidizing a hotel for WF because it chose to build a suburban office campus instead of an actual downtown office near hotels is a good one.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post6:53 PM - 1 day ago#243

Hey, Alex, I've got a hypothetical question for you (I'm not trying to set you up; I'm genuinely curious):

Would you rather have Wells Fargo continue as they are on their current campus, or would you rather they consolidate into a new high-rise in downtown Clayton? ( Those are your only two choices)

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post7:46 PM - 1 day ago#244

framer wrote:Hey, Alex, I've got a hypothetical question for you (I'm not trying to set you up; I'm genuinely curious):

Would you rather have Wells Fargo continue as they are on their current campus, or would you rather they consolidate into a new high-rise in downtown Clayton? ( Those are your only two choices)
Obviously stay in Midtown.

We should all be able to agree that their current campus is bad for the city and the city would be way better off with WFA in the core of downtown but them being in Midtown is still better than them being out of the city.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk




12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post8:29 PM - 1 day ago#245

OK; now let's up the ante.

What if WF said they were moving to Clayton unless the City subsidized a hotel on their campus. Would you give in to the blackmail, or would you tell them to go?

Again, purely hypothetical.

19
New MemberNew Member
19

Post9:05 PM - 1 day ago#246

Let's get one thing straight.  Wells Fargo and its predecessor. Wachovia, had nothing to do with the design or construction of their current campus at Jefferson and Market.  The first building in that complex, the one just torn down for the hotel, was built and occupied by A. G. Edwards, a locally owned and operated brokerage house that started out in downtown.  I believe they started out in the old Victoria Building at 8th and Locust.  But in the early 1970's, AGE bought the northwest corner of Jefferson and Market and built the first building which they occupied in 1973.  It was completed at the same time as Breakthrough East of Laclede Town was completed.  I know because I was the first occupant of apartment 703 of the building at 60 North Ewing.   I could look out my window and see the back of AGE, which obstructed my view of the Arch.  When you had the original Laclede Town, Breakthrough East, Peacock Alley, Heritage House Apartments, the circular Rodeway Inn, and the Lindbergh Cadillac Building, which was on the southeast corner of Jefferson and Market, you had some nice massing and some modest urban form going on there, AGE's surface parking lot in from of the original building notwithstanding.  The northeast section of Mill Creek, (between Jefferson,, 20th, Olive and Market) always had suburban type, low rise buildings in it, but they were occupied by some big name companies at the time, like Smith-Corona-Merrill, Olivetti Underwood and Utilities Insurance.  

Unfortunately, the gaping hole in the urban fabric from the demolition of buildings for the North South Distributor created a no-mans land between Downtown West and Mill Creek Valley that precluded any unification of downtown and Mill Creek Valley.  I used to walk to and from the old YMCA on Locust and 16th.  Downtown West was still pretty alive with Aloe Medical Industries at 19th and Olive, the Century Electric plant on Market, Fruin-Colnon Construction at 17th and Olive, the Sealtest Dairy on 20th street and lots of wholesalers in the huge building at 18th and Olive (now apartments).  The silence of the vacancy and emptiness was deafening compared to the activity immediately east and west of this strip of land.   

Along with Father Biondi at SLU, AGE was instrumental in getting Laclede Town/Laclede Park/Breakthrough East and Breakthrough West destroyed.  But can you blame them?  Who would want a festering slum right on your doorstep, which is what Laclede Town had descended into.  AGE then acquired the land and when on a major building spree.  Then they bought the Sherwood Medical Building (now the police department headquarters) and expanded there.  All told, AGE had almost a million square feet at their complex.  But my point is is that the entire campus was designed and built by AGE.  Wells Fargo had nothing to do with the design of the buildings there.    Wachovia bought AGE, then Wells Fargo inherited the campus when it took over the failing Wachovia Bank.  St. Louis dodged a bullet when Wells Fargo decided to consolidate its brokerages at the STL site.  They could have moved the whole darn shootin' match to Richmond, Virginia.       

But the market is built on supply and demand, and right now, there is little to no demand for retail, commercial, office and residential space in and around downtown St. Louis.  I just recently moved back to STL after a 50+ years absence, and I really don't want to go downtown now.  It's too far gone as far as abandonment and vacancy, and I remember when it was still a fairly active hub of retail, wholesale, light manufacturing and office space.  I don't pretend to know all the reasons for the lack of demand here, but taxing already lightly used parking lots in the hopes of somebody MIGHT build something on them is not the way to go.

And as a resident of Pennsylvania for the last 50 years, I can tell you downtown Pittsburgh and downtown St. Louis are in no way comparable.  For one thing, downtown Pittsburgh does not have the competition of Chesterfield/Westport/Maryland Heights/Clayton/Brentwood to worry about.  Pittsburgh does not have real estate developers whose sole purpose is to destroy downtown Pittsburgh, unlike St. Louis.  What Pittsburgh does have in abundant supply is dying old mill towns like McKeesport, Beaver Falls, and Braddock, places that make Wellston look like Beverly Hills.        

20
New MemberNew Member
20

Post9:28 PM - 1 day ago#247

I think a re-stitching of the Central Corridor to the near south and north sides of the city would, long term be what's best for the overall health of the city and would do the most to ensure the strength and stability of urban life in the region.  From 40 south to Chouteau, if we could fill-in with parks and development, we we could have a more cohesive & connected city and present an improving face to both residents and visitors.  These corporations occupy these areas and have made substantial investments to comfortably operate in the spaces that they have selected.  We could bring them to the table and help to encourage them to urbanize what they already have created or inherited.  I want to dream big but we also need a dose of reality and try to improve what we have and not just throw it all away.

I believe a downtown with strong connections to an equally strong surrounding group of neighborhoods would provide sustainable energy and prove to be more resilient than just spending money moving around chess pieces.  It seems like some of the thriving peer downtowns have a variety of living and office developments in and around their downtowns and allow for people with all different preferences to frequent their downtowns.  Even if they don't necessarily live or work IN their respective downtowns.

745
Senior MemberSenior Member
745

Post9:56 PM - 1 day ago#248

framer wrote:OK; now let's up the ante.

What if WF said they were moving to Clayton unless the City subsidized a hotel on their campus. Would you give in to the blackmail, or would you tell them to go?

Again, purely hypothetical.
Well if they're going to Clayton, they're probably building new because there isn't anywhere near enough available space, even older space, for them right now.

So if I were mayor, I'd offer a big incentive package for them to build new downtown, including property tax breaks, sales tax breaks, earnings tax breaks, maybe I'd even look into TIF pathways to help with funding. Such a deal would be far greater for downtown's long term outlook than we can imagine.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


Post10:15 PM - 1 day ago#249

steveinphilly wrote:Let's get one thing straight.  Wells Fargo and its predecessor. Wachovia, had nothing to do with the design or construction of their current campus at Jefferson and Market.  The first building in that complex, the one just torn down for the hotel, was built and occupied by A. G. Edwards, a locally owned and operated brokerage house that started out in downtown.  I believe they started out in the old Victoria Building at 8th and Locust.  But in the early 1970's, AGE bought the northwest corner of Jefferson and Market and built the first building which they occupied in 1973.  It was completed at the same time as Breakthrough East of Laclede Town was completed.  I know because I was the first occupant of apartment 703 of the building at 60 North Ewing.   I could look out my window and see the back of AGE, which obstructed my view of the Arch.  When you had the original Laclede Town, Breakthrough East, Peacock Alley, Heritage House Apartments, the circular Rodeway Inn, and the Lindbergh Cadillac Building, which was on the southeast corner of Jefferson and Market, you had some nice massing and some modest urban form going on there, AGE's surface parking lot in from of the original building notwithstanding.  The northeast section of Mill Creek, (between Jefferson,, 20th, Olive and Market) always had suburban type, low rise buildings in it, but they were occupied by some big name companies at the time, like Smith-Corona-Merrill, Olivetti Underwood and Utilities Insurance.  

Unfortunately, the gaping hole in the urban fabric from the demolition of buildings for the North South Distributor created a no-mans land between Downtown West and Mill Creek Valley that precluded any unification of downtown and Mill Creek Valley.  I used to walk to and from the old YMCA on Locust and 16th.  Downtown West was still pretty alive with Aloe Medical Industries at 19th and Olive, the Century Electric plant on Market, Fruin-Colnon Construction at 17th and Olive, the Sealtest Dairy on 20th street and lots of wholesalers in the huge building at 18th and Olive (now apartments).  The silence of the vacancy and emptiness was deafening compared to the activity immediately east and west of this strip of land.   

Along with Father Biondi at SLU, AGE was instrumental in getting Laclede Town/Laclede Park/Breakthrough East and Breakthrough West destroyed.  But can you blame them?  Who would want a festering slum right on your doorstep, which is what Laclede Town had descended into.  AGE then acquired the land and when on a major building spree.  Then they bought the Sherwood Medical Building (now the police department headquarters) and expanded there.  All told, AGE had almost a million square feet at their complex.  But my point is is that the entire campus was designed and built by AGE.  Wells Fargo had nothing to do with the design of the buildings there.    Wachovia bought AGE, then Wells Fargo inherited the campus when it took over the failing Wachovia Bank.  St. Louis dodged a bullet when Wells Fargo decided to consolidate its brokerages at the STL site.  They could have moved the whole darn shootin' match to Richmond, Virginia.       

But the market is built on supply and demand, and right now, there is little to no demand for retail, commercial, office and residential space in and around downtown St. Louis.  I just recently moved back to STL after a 50+ years absence, and I really don't want to go downtown now.  It's too far gone as far as abandonment and vacancy, and I remember when it was still a fairly active hub of retail, wholesale, light manufacturing and office space.  I don't pretend to know all the reasons for the lack of demand here, but taxing already lightly used parking lots in the hopes of somebody MIGHT build something on them is not the way to go.

And as a resident of Pennsylvania for the last 50 years, I can tell you downtown Pittsburgh and downtown St. Louis are in no way comparable.  For one thing, downtown Pittsburgh does not have the competition of Chesterfield/Westport/Maryland Heights/Clayton/Brentwood to worry about.  Pittsburgh does not have real estate developers whose sole purpose is to destroy downtown Pittsburgh, unlike St. Louis.  What Pittsburgh does have in abundant supply is dying old mill towns like McKeesport, Beaver Falls, and Braddock, places that make Wellston look like Beverly Hills.        
If it made more sense for WFA to move to Richmond, they would have done it. It made more sense to stay in STL. No companies are giving gifts to STL by moving here or keeping operations here, this myth needs to die.

Your entire post can be summarized as "downtown is a lost cause" and that's just not acceptable or true. The point of trying to get these companies that occupy inefficient campuses that generate comparatively little property taxes (less per acre than some single family neighborhoods) to move into downtown is to boost downtown and make it better. WFA isn't being forced to stay in the 1980s suburban office campus lol.

Downtown STL didn't have Clayton or Chesterfield to compete with back in 1901 when Pittsburgh established its LVT, which is widely recognized as helping to save downtown Pittsburgh. You're old enough, you should have an idea of how many buildings downtown were destroyed in favor of surface parking lots. As it ever occurred to you that allowing that and even incentivizing that is partially what led to downtown's demise?

If there's a surface parking lot downtown, I want it owned by the city so the city can reap the revenue from something unhealthy for downtown. The only way to do that is by taxing them heavily.

Also worth reminding you that theres tens of thousands of jobs downtown and more occupied office space than Clayton.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


1,088
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,088

Post10:55 PM - 1 day ago#250

StlAlex wrote:
framer wrote:OK; now let's up the ante.

What if WF said they were moving to Clayton unless the City subsidized a hotel on their campus. Would you give in to the blackmail, or would you tell them to go?

Again, purely hypothetical.
Well if they're going to Clayton, they're probably building new because there isn't anywhere near enough available space, even older space, for them right now.

So if I were mayor, I'd offer a big incentive package for them to build new downtown, including property tax breaks, sales tax breaks, earnings tax breaks, maybe I'd even look into TIF pathways to help with funding. Such a deal would be far greater for downtown's long term outlook than we can imagine.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
TBH. I think a move to the South with little to no warning would be more likely than a move to Clayton.

Read more posts (11 remaining)