Highly recommend a trip back to the opening 10 or so pages in this thread to enjoy the suicidal stupidity of Mark Haversham, Goat314 and Chris Stritzel.
Incredible face eating leopards stuff.
Incredible face eating leopards stuff.
- 975
How could doing that possibly be enjoyable?JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑7:28 PM - 9 days agoHighly recommend a trip back to the opening 10 or so pages in this thread to enjoy the suicidal stupidity of Mark Haversham, Goat314 and Chris Stritzel.
Incredible face eating leopards stuff.
- 168
How could doing that possibly be enjoyable?
Its about revenge and its rampant
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/739999/the-science-of-revenge-by-james-kimmel-jr-jd/
Its about revenge and its rampant
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/739999/the-science-of-revenge-by-james-kimmel-jr-jd/
- 1,793
Seeing idiots be proven to be idiots is one of the great joys of life. Everyone enjoys it, and anyone who claims otherwise is a liar.
- 975
I don’t know about that. Seems like you are the only one here who feels that way.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑12:21 AM - 8 days agoSeeing idiots be proven to be idiots is one of the great joys of life. Everyone enjoys it, and anyone who claims otherwise is a liar.
Well we know you were rooting for the fascists to do a good job like you've said on this thread before. So makes sense that you aren't laughing.Debaliviere91 wrote:I don’t know about that. Seems like you are the only one here who feels that way.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑12:21 AM - 8 days agoSeeing idiots be proven to be idiots is one of the great joys of life. Everyone enjoys it, and anyone who claims otherwise is a liar.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 975
You challenge people all the time on here to back up what they are saying with facts. Go back through this thread and find just one example where it could be implied that I was rooting for the fascists.StlAlex wrote: ↑3:04 PM - 8 days agoWell we know you were rooting for the fascists to do a good job like you've said on this thread before. So makes sense that you aren't laughing.Debaliviere91 wrote:I don’t know about that. Seems like you are the only one here who feels that way.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑12:21 AM - 8 days agoSeeing idiots be proven to be idiots is one of the great joys of life. Everyone enjoys it, and anyone who claims otherwise is a liar.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 1,793
ICE has fallen out of the news because they stopped killing white people in the streets.
Nevertheless, it’s important to point out that ICE has murdered 50 people since Trump took office (not to mention the number they have assaulted and/or abused). And the murders continue.
ICE is also ramping up construction of “detention centers” AKA concentration camps for undocumented people and anyone else who gets caught in ICE’s dragnet.
Nevertheless, it’s important to point out that ICE has murdered 50 people since Trump took office (not to mention the number they have assaulted and/or abused). And the murders continue.
ICE is also ramping up construction of “detention centers” AKA concentration camps for undocumented people and anyone else who gets caught in ICE’s dragnet.
Direct quotes:Debaliviere91 wrote:You challenge people all the time on here to back up what they are saying with facts. Go back through this thread and find just one example where it could be implied that I was rooting for the fascists.StlAlex wrote: ↑3:04 PM - 8 days agoWell we know you were rooting for the fascists to do a good job like you've said on this thread before. So makes sense that you aren't laughing.Debaliviere91 wrote: I don’t know about that. Seems like you are the only one here who feels that way.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
"I definitely agree that your prediction would be a far better outcome. I’m rooting for it."
#395, April 15, 2025, in response to someone shilling for DOGE and arguing that it was going to end up being great and more effective than it was at the time. Obviously the brainwashed robot was wrong, but here you were giving credence to it and "rooting" for the outcome the fascists preferred.
"Why would I root for an outcome that would be disastrous to my fellow Americans?"
#414, April 15, 2025, saying you don't want a disastrous outcome logically means you must want a good outcome, which implies the fascist policies must work to some degree, which would garner popular support for more fascist policies and politicians.
Luckily, you were wrong as you always are and we are getting a horrific outcome for Americans, which is why this government is starting to flirt with Biden levels of unpopularity and Democrats may have a real shot at winning the Senate in November, none of which would be popular if your preferred outcome happened.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 975
None of the 5 examples you listed above imply I was rooting for fascists. Even a low level of reading comprehension could grasp this. I think you are smart enough to understand this too. You just post too quickly and with too much emotion.StlAlex wrote: ↑6:16 PM - 8 days agoDirect quotes:Debaliviere91 wrote:You challenge people all the time on here to back up what they are saying with facts. Go back through this thread and find just one example where it could be implied that I was rooting for the fascists.
"I definitely agree that your prediction would be a far better outcome. I’m rooting for it."
#395, April 15, 2025, in response to someone shilling for DOGE and arguing that it was going to end up being great and more effective than it was at the time. Obviously the brainwashed robot was wrong, but here you were giving credence to it and "rooting" for the outcome the fascists preferred.
"Why would I root for an outcome that would be disastrous to my fellow Americans?"
#414, April 15, 2025, saying you don't want a disastrous outcome logically means you must want a good outcome, which implies the fascist policies must work to some degree, which would garner popular support for more fascist policies and politicians.
Luckily, you were wrong as you always are and we are getting a horrific outcome for Americans, which is why this government is starting to flirt with Biden levels of unpopularity and Democrats may have a real shot at winning the Senate in November, none of which would be popular if your preferred outcome happened.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
You cited DOGE as an example. I wasn’t wrong on DOGE. I said it was destined to fail just like you did, and we were right. I said I would still root for it to be successful at eliminating government fraud and waste.
I’ve said from the start Trump is the wrong choice but I’ll root for his Presidency to go as well as it can. What am I supposed to do? Root for it to go as poorly as possible? That has real implications on a lot of people’s lives.
The most unpopular part of Trumps Presidency right now is the Iran War. I’ve been against it since before his Presidency. Should I be rooting for more death and destruction over there so it helps Democrats chances in the mid terms and in 2028? Anything as long as our team wins.
Please just go back in your hole. People are dying and here you still want Trump to do well lmao.Debaliviere91 wrote:None of the 5 examples you listed above imply I was rooting for fascists. Even a low level of reading comprehension could grasp this. I think you are smart enough to understand this too. You just post too quickly and with too much emotion.StlAlex wrote: ↑6:16 PM - 8 days agoDirect quotes:Debaliviere91 wrote: You challenge people all the time on here to back up what they are saying with facts. Go back through this thread and find just one example where it could be implied that I was rooting for the fascists.
"I definitely agree that your prediction would be a far better outcome. I’m rooting for it."
#395, April 15, 2025, in response to someone shilling for DOGE and arguing that it was going to end up being great and more effective than it was at the time. Obviously the brainwashed robot was wrong, but here you were giving credence to it and "rooting" for the outcome the fascists preferred.
"Why would I root for an outcome that would be disastrous to my fellow Americans?"
#414, April 15, 2025, saying you don't want a disastrous outcome logically means you must want a good outcome, which implies the fascist policies must work to some degree, which would garner popular support for more fascist policies and politicians.
Luckily, you were wrong as you always are and we are getting a horrific outcome for Americans, which is why this government is starting to flirt with Biden levels of unpopularity and Democrats may have a real shot at winning the Senate in November, none of which would be popular if your preferred outcome happened.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
You cited DOGE as an example. I wasn’t wrong on DOGE. I said it was destined to fail just like you did, and we were right. I said I would still root for it to be successful at eliminating government fraud and waste.
I’ve said from the start Trump is the wrong choice but I’ll root for his Presidency to go as well as it can. What am I supposed to do? Root for it to go as poorly as possible? That has real implications on a lot of people’s lives.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
You've made clear you aren't on my team, you just reiterated your wish for Trump's presidency to do well.Debaliviere91 wrote:The most unpopular part of Trumps Presidency right now is the Iran War. I’ve been against it since before his Presidency. Should I be rooting for more death and destruction over there so it helps Democrats chances in the mid terms and in 2028? Anything as long as our team wins.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 975
You just don’t get it. I want the war to go in a direction where less people die. Even if that’s a more favorable outcome for Trump. Where do you stand? A quicker resolution to the war (which I continue to be confident won’t happen) would be better for Trump but it would mean less people die. Try to actually respond to what I am asking you and not an attack on me. Where do you stand?StlAlex wrote: ↑7:09 PM - 8 days agoPlease just go back in your hole. People are dying and here you still want Trump to do well lmao.Debaliviere91 wrote:None of the 5 examples you listed above imply I was rooting for fascists. Even a low level of reading comprehension could grasp this. I think you are smart enough to understand this too. You just post too quickly and with too much emotion.StlAlex wrote: ↑6:16 PM - 8 days agoDirect quotes:
"I definitely agree that your prediction would be a far better outcome. I’m rooting for it."
#395, April 15, 2025, in response to someone shilling for DOGE and arguing that it was going to end up being great and more effective than it was at the time. Obviously the brainwashed robot was wrong, but here you were giving credence to it and "rooting" for the outcome the fascists preferred.
"Why would I root for an outcome that would be disastrous to my fellow Americans?"
#414, April 15, 2025, saying you don't want a disastrous outcome logically means you must want a good outcome, which implies the fascist policies must work to some degree, which would garner popular support for more fascist policies and politicians.
Luckily, you were wrong as you always are and we are getting a horrific outcome for Americans, which is why this government is starting to flirt with Biden levels of unpopularity and Democrats may have a real shot at winning the Senate in November, none of which would be popular if your preferred outcome happened.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
You cited DOGE as an example. I wasn’t wrong on DOGE. I said it was destined to fail just like you did, and we were right. I said I would still root for it to be successful at eliminating government fraud and waste.
I’ve said from the start Trump is the wrong choice but I’ll root for his Presidency to go as well as it can. What am I supposed to do? Root for it to go as poorly as possible? That has real implications on a lot of people’s lives.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I want better outcomes for this country and its people because that’s what matters.StlAlex wrote: ↑7:09 PM - 8 days agoPlease just go back in your hole. People are dying and here you still want Trump to do well lmao.Debaliviere91 wrote:None of the 5 examples you listed above imply I was rooting for fascists. Even a low level of reading comprehension could grasp this. I think you are smart enough to understand this too. You just post too quickly and with too much emotion.StlAlex wrote: ↑6:16 PM - 8 days agoDirect quotes:
"I definitely agree that your prediction would be a far better outcome. I’m rooting for it."
#395, April 15, 2025, in response to someone shilling for DOGE and arguing that it was going to end up being great and more effective than it was at the time. Obviously the brainwashed robot was wrong, but here you were giving credence to it and "rooting" for the outcome the fascists preferred.
"Why would I root for an outcome that would be disastrous to my fellow Americans?"
#414, April 15, 2025, saying you don't want a disastrous outcome logically means you must want a good outcome, which implies the fascist policies must work to some degree, which would garner popular support for more fascist policies and politicians.
Luckily, you were wrong as you always are and we are getting a horrific outcome for Americans, which is why this government is starting to flirt with Biden levels of unpopularity and Democrats may have a real shot at winning the Senate in November, none of which would be popular if your preferred outcome happened.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
You cited DOGE as an example. I wasn’t wrong on DOGE. I said it was destined to fail just like you did, and we were right. I said I would still root for it to be successful at eliminating government fraud and waste.
I’ve said from the start Trump is the wrong choice but I’ll root for his Presidency to go as well as it can. What am I supposed to do? Root for it to go as poorly as possible? That has real implications on a lot of people’s lives.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
My position is that if you're rooting for this administration, you are the enemy.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 975
Ok. You didn’t answer the question about the War that I directly asked you.
My position is rooting against this administration at the cost of actual people in this country and abroad is evil.
It’s also not a winning proposition for the left as people tried to warn you in this very thread before the election.
- 1,793
I want Democrats that are willing to condemn the president and the war itself for being the illegal war of aggression that it is instead of trying to win political points by pointing out that the Trump’s war is going poorly.
Come primary season, any Democrat unwilling to condemn the war itself should be primaried.
Come primary season, any Democrat unwilling to condemn the war itself should be primaried.
- 975
Totally agree.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑8:21 PM - 7 days agoI want Democrats that are willing to condemn the president and the war itself for being the illegal war of aggression that it is instead of trying to win political points by pointing out that the Trump’s war is going poorly.
Come primary season, any Democrat unwilling to condemn the war itself should be primaried.
- 1,793
They won’t. Including Wesley Bell. For fear of angering our “greatest ally” and the “most moral country on earth”Debaliviere91 wrote: ↑8:22 PM - 7 days agoTotally agree.JaneJacobsGhost wrote: ↑8:21 PM - 7 days agoI want Democrats that are willing to condemn the president and the war itself for being the illegal war of aggression that it is instead of trying to win political points by pointing out that the Trump’s war is going poorly.
Come primary season, any Democrat unwilling to condemn the war itself should be primaried.
You're right the winning strategy was green-lighting the genocide of Palestinians, green-lighting the ethnic cleansing of southern Lebanon, and calling Iran our greatest national security threat.Debaliviere91 wrote:Ok. You didn’t answer the question about the War that I directly asked you.
My position is rooting against this administration at the cost of actual people in this country and abroad is evil.
It’s also not a winning proposition for the left as people tried to warn you in this very thread before the election.
Centrists and the ideology you adhere to are just as much to blame as Trump for what's happening in Iran. You don't accept that.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 975
I can’t even begin to understand what this comment is actually responding to.StlAlex wrote: ↑10:03 PM - 7 days agoYou're right the winning strategy was green-lighting the genocide of Palestinians, green-lighting the ethnic cleansing of southern Lebanon, and calling Iran our greatest national security threat.Debaliviere91 wrote:Ok. You didn’t answer the question about the War that I directly asked you.
My position is rooting against this administration at the cost of actual people in this country and abroad is evil.
It’s also not a winning proposition for the left as people tried to warn you in this very thread before the election.
Centrists and the ideology you adhere to are just as much to blame as Trump for what's happening in Iran. You don't accept that.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I’m not a centrist and I don’t think milquetoast democrats who don’t push back against Trump is a winning strategy any more than just rooting for Trump to fail even if it hurts real people is a winning strategy. This isn’t that hard.
I’d like you to answer if you support a swifter end to the Iran War even if that benefits Trump politically.
"Trust me I don't like Trump, I just want the people who voted for him to be rewarded and live happy lives where they don't experience the consequences of voting for an demented fascist who ran on death and destruction for all."Debaliviere91 wrote:I can’t even begin to understand what this comment is actually responding to.StlAlex wrote: ↑10:03 PM - 7 days agoYou're right the winning strategy was green-lighting the genocide of Palestinians, green-lighting the ethnic cleansing of southern Lebanon, and calling Iran our greatest national security threat.Debaliviere91 wrote: Ok. You didn’t answer the question about the War that I directly asked you.
My position is rooting against this administration at the cost of actual people in this country and abroad is evil.
It’s also not a winning proposition for the left as people tried to warn you in this very thread before the election.
Centrists and the ideology you adhere to are just as much to blame as Trump for what's happening in Iran. You don't accept that.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I’m not a centrist and I don’t think milquetoast democrats who don’t push back against Trump is a winning strategy any more than just rooting for Trump to fail even if it hurts real people is a winning strategy. This isn’t that hard.
I’d like you to answer if you support a swifter end to the Iran War even if that benefits Trump politically.
BAHAHAHAHA
Did you reward your kids when they did bad or did you issue a punishment to reinforce that what they did was bad?
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
- 975
Who are you quoting there? That doesn’t make any sense. You are just responding with made up quotes or rhetorical positions that I haven’t taken.StlAlex wrote: ↑11:21 PM - 7 days ago"Trust me I don't like Trump, I just want the people who voted for him to be rewarded and live happy lives where they don't experience the consequences of voting for an demented fascist who ran on death and destruction for all."Debaliviere91 wrote:I can’t even begin to understand what this comment is actually responding to.StlAlex wrote: ↑10:03 PM - 7 days agoYou're right the winning strategy was green-lighting the genocide of Palestinians, green-lighting the ethnic cleansing of southern Lebanon, and calling Iran our greatest national security threat.
Centrists and the ideology you adhere to are just as much to blame as Trump for what's happening in Iran. You don't accept that.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I’m not a centrist and I don’t think milquetoast democrats who don’t push back against Trump is a winning strategy any more than just rooting for Trump to fail even if it hurts real people is a winning strategy. This isn’t that hard.
I’d like you to answer if you support a swifter end to the Iran War even if that benefits Trump politically.
BAHAHAHAHA
Did you reward your kids when they did bad or did you issue a punishment to reinforce that what they did was bad?
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
You are referring to the people who voted for Trump. What about the people who didn’t vote for Trump and suffer?
