2,626
Life MemberLife Member
2,626

PostAug 15, 2025#776

What alderperson is going to have the courage to write up a bill instituting a moratorium on data center construction in the city limits?

488
Full MemberFull Member
488

PostAug 15, 2025#777

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Aug 15, 2025
What alderperson is going to have the courage to write up a bill instituting a moratorium on data center construction in the city limits?
That would be bad.  A data center would make sense on the north riverfront, along highway 70, south riverfront, a few other areas potentially. Not sure why a slow/no growth city would be against some investment in some real estate that has no real residential/commercial future.

1,794
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,794

PostAug 15, 2025#778

mjbais1489 wrote:
Aug 15, 2025
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Aug 15, 2025
What alderperson is going to have the courage to write up a bill instituting a moratorium on data center construction in the city limits?
Not sure why a slow/no growth city would be against some investment in some real estate that has no real residential/commercial future.
Classic StL. This is an untrue statement. But it’s passed off as an unassailable truth. When will St. Louisans choose to learn rather than loathe? It’s such an ugly look on us.

2,055
Life MemberLife Member
2,055

PostAug 18, 2025#779

mjbais1489 wrote:
Aug 15, 2025
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Aug 15, 2025
What alderperson is going to have the courage to write up a bill instituting a moratorium on data center construction in the city limits?
That would be bad.  A data center would make sense on the north riverfront, along highway 70, south riverfront, a few other areas potentially. Not sure why a slow/no growth city would be against some investment in some real estate that has no real residential/commercial future.
This is kind of where I'm at as well... we should figure out what positives we should get out of a data center getting built that would outweigh the negatives and then put that in writing somewhere. For example: any data center will require a full roof of solar panels, must have street trees surrounding the entire project, zero tax incentives, maybe the property tax is 1.5X, etc? 

2,678
Life MemberLife Member
2,678

PostAug 22, 2025#780

This is what I would expect based on what information we have at this point. Oddly enough, also within a planned development district for Illinois Medical District. 
https://medp.io/projects/

1,794
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,794

PostAug 22, 2025#781

dredger wrote:
Aug 20, 2025
But jobs none the less and a lot of well paying construction jobs and investment to get them built.
What jobs? There are temporary construction jobs but what are we left with full time? 1 plumber, 1 electrician, 1 hardware technician, and 1 custodian? Who else?

I would hate to see A/B, Sigma, P&G, etc. forgo future development in StL that actually employs people because the utilities are being gobbled up by a bunch of computers that want to make human labor obsolete.

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostAug 22, 2025#782

^  a Job is a Job is a Job especially for a city that relies on earnings tax for part of its general fund & city services..  Passing them up whether it be in the teens or even a hundred or so for the larger data centers is meaningful.  Not to mention property tax generation.  

A/B, Sigma, P&G, etc. are all trying to figure out how to do more with automation and less with people...   Don't think speculative hope is the answer to City future.   

1,794
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,794

PostAug 22, 2025#783

I’m full of “speculative hope” while you’re being short sighted handing over valuable real estate and utility capacity to computers that don’t create meaningful local employment.

Do you have evidence that the strain these facilities put on infrastructure is overcome by the property tax revenue they generate? Will they even generate property taxes? Seems like they still get generous subsidies

2,678
Life MemberLife Member
2,678

PostAug 22, 2025#784

The jobs discussion for Data Centers is irrelevant. Of course the developer is going to tell you differently but review business journals and investor materials. The day-to-day maintenance will be automated within a decade. It will eventually be cheaper for companies to fly in the necessary technician to complete larger maintenance than to staff anyone at the facilities themselves. 

These are the power substations of the 21st century. Eventually becoming lifeless voids of infrastructure that only produce value for those well outside of the region. Further, there is no competitive advantage to being closer to data centers. It doesn't ensure St. Louis competes or attracts talent.

431
Full MemberFull Member
431

PostAug 27, 2025#785

addxb2 wrote:
Aug 22, 2025
The jobs discussion for Data Centers is irrelevant. Of course the developer is going to tell you differently but review business journals and investor materials. The day-to-day maintenance will be automated within a decade. It will eventually be cheaper for companies to fly in the necessary technician to complete larger maintenance than to staff anyone at the facilities themselves. 

These are the power substations of the 21st century. Eventually becoming lifeless voids of infrastructure that only produce value for those well outside of the region. Further, there is no competitive advantage to being closer to data centers. It doesn't ensure St. Louis competes or attracts talent.
100% Correct. AI and related infrastructure, like most industries with large amounts of liquid capital, are optimized to pump wealth out of local communities and into the hands of the transnational capitalist class. Yes, this sounds like a conspiracy, because it is, and they're actually very transparent about it if you know where to look. 

Ignore the "jobs!" "progress!" "the future!" marketing slop they feed to elected officials and the public and look at the investment materials and trade publications where they make this explicit.

2,055
Life MemberLife Member
2,055

PostAug 27, 2025#786

Ugh. 

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostAug 27, 2025#787

It's too bad because I like that building, thought it looked pretty cool. But lots of homeless and drug activity around it, the environment around it is horrible, and there's just no real vision for fixing this area up at all. So it just rots, and eventually burns down I guess.

925

PostAug 27, 2025#788

Cool building. Interstate blight strikes. Letting buildings rot with zero action strikes. Interesting architecture continues to burn in our city. Only has happened 100 times on the north riverfront and patch.

595
Senior MemberSenior Member
595

PostAug 27, 2025#789

The former Jj’s nightclub spot was such a very popular spot for the LGBQT+ community so many fun memories were had there what a shame that the building couldn’t be saved & redeveloped

2,055
Life MemberLife Member
2,055

PostAug 28, 2025#790

I was wondering how bad the smoke looked over there, someone got it on video


2,678
Life MemberLife Member
2,678

PostAug 28, 2025#791

PlatinumBlues wrote:
Aug 27, 2025
The former Jj’s nightclub spot was such a very popular spot for the LGBQT+ community so many fun memories were had there what a shame that the building couldn’t be saved & redeveloped
Pour one out for when STL bar scene was fun and gritty. Not corporate putt putt bars.

2,055
Life MemberLife Member
2,055

PostAug 28, 2025#792

addxb2 wrote:
Aug 28, 2025
PlatinumBlues wrote:
Aug 27, 2025
The former Jj’s nightclub spot was such a very popular spot for the LGBQT+ community so many fun memories were had there what a shame that the building couldn’t be saved & redeveloped
Pour one out for when STL bar scene was fun and gritty. Not corporate putt putt bars.
And there was a new brewery opening every month 🍻

68
New MemberNew Member
68

PostAug 30, 2025#793

I think these fires will frequently continue until we stop allowing intersection begging. Between the trash they generate and the public funding their addiction, its a shame that a few are allowed to affect the whole.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostSep 12, 2025#794

Not sure if this rendering has ben posted before. 

https://www.stlmag.com/news/aldermen-da ... =380210815


2,678
Life MemberLife Member
2,678

PostSep 12, 2025#795

Ew. Get lost Phil. No life. It’s better as a big empty lot.
If STL builds this, shut down MetroLink. STL doesn’t deserve it.

Notice how it’s at an angle as to take up THE ENTIRE AREA. Terrible.

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostSep 12, 2025#796

This being build would radicalize me.

2,626
Life MemberLife Member
2,626

PostSep 12, 2025#797

What an embarrassment. Really happy to see the alders in support of the moratorium, these things are a cancer.

925

PostSep 12, 2025#798

Is there a reason why they won’t just sell to another developer? It’s a large parcel with a rehabbed large building. There’s a chunk of change and move on

138
Junior MemberJunior Member
138

PostSep 12, 2025#799

framer wrote:
Sep 12, 2025
Not sure if this rendering has ben posted before. 

https://www.stlmag.com/news/aldermen-da ... =380210815

This is absolutely ridiculous for that location. Is Green Street trying to do this on a speculative basis or do they already have a user in tow?  

PostSep 12, 2025#800

delmar2debaliviere2downtown wrote:
Sep 12, 2025
Is there a reason why they won’t just sell to another developer? It’s a large parcel with a rehabbed large building. There’s a chunk of change and move on
Sunk cost fallacy?

Read more posts (213 remaining)