Tapatalk

Wainwright Building

Wainwright Building

79
New MemberNew Member
79

PostJul 02, 2024#1

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/cri ... af78f.html

State to exit downtown St. Louis by selling two office buildings

JEFFERSON CITY — Top state officials voted Tuesday to sell two downtown St. Louis office buildings and move many of the 600 workers to a facility in Chesterfield.
Members of the Missouri Board of Public Buildings, which includes Gov. Mike Parson, Lt. Gov. Mike Kehoe and Attorney General Andrew Bailey, voted unanimously to pursue the sale of the historic Wainwright Office Building at 7th and Chestnut streets and the Mill Creek Office Building at 220 S. Jefferson Ave.
The reason for the pending moves was described as financial. There was no mention of crime in the downtown area playing a role in the decision.
The process, which could take a year, will allow for the state to consolidate unused or under-used office space affecting employees in at least 12 state agencies, including the Department of Corrections, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Department of Labor.

Proceeds from the sale of the two buildings will be used to purchase the facility in Chesterfield, said Brian Yansen, director of facilities management for the governor’s Office of Administration.


Cost estimates for the sale and possible purchase were not disclosed.
Office of Administration Commissioner Ken Zellers said the state believes it would cost $23 million to maintain and repair the Wainwright, which the state bought 50 years ago during former Gov. Christopher “Kit” Bond’s administration.
The Mill Creek building, which sits on 4.25 acres near the intersection of Jefferson and Market Street, was built in 1975. A buyer has expressed interest in purchasing the facility, Yansen said.


Not all workers affected by the sales will move out of downtown, said OA spokesman Chris Moreland. Employees in the Missouri Department of Corrections probation and parole division will stay in the city’s core, as will some Department of Social Services workers, he said.

“There are so many moving parts,” Zellers said. “We want to do what makes sense.”

The Wainwright Building, designed by Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler, was built in the 1890s and is among the world's first skyscrapers.
The 10-story Wainwright building is considered the forerunner of the first skyscrapers in St. Louis when the structure designed by Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler opened in 1892.  It is a designated historic landmark.

In 1974, Bond helped pave the way for its purchase as a way to boost downtown St. Louis. At the time, Democratic leaders in the Legislature wanted to buy a building in midtown near St. Louis University to help that part of the city.

In 2019, Parson rejected a request by some state workers to move out of the downtown area because of concerns about crime.

A spokesman said at the time the move was not a priority, but the possibility of an exodus of workers set off alarm bells for downtown boosters and elected officials who represent the area.
Although the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant reduction in foot traffic in the area, crime has been a recurring theme in the exodus of workers from downtown. Last weekend, a shooting marked the ninth homicide already this year in the Downtown and Downtown West neighborhoods, according to city police crime records. There were only six all of last year, and in 2022, there were nine total. 


In addition to the symbolism of Parson moving workers out of the heart of the state’s economic engine, the move also could cost the city by reducing the amount it receives from its 1 percent earnings tax on people who work in the city.

City officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

978
Super MemberSuper Member
978

PostJul 02, 2024#2

verdantruins wrote:https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/cri ... af78f.html

State to exit downtown St. Louis by selling two office buildings

JEFFERSON CITY — Top state officials voted Tuesday to sell two downtown St. Louis office buildings and move many of the 600 workers to a facility in Chesterfield.
Members of the Missouri Board of Public Buildings, which includes Gov. Mike Parson, Lt. Gov. Mike Kehoe and Attorney General Andrew Bailey, voted unanimously to pursue the sale of the historic Wainwright Office Building at 7th and Chestnut streets and the Mill Creek Office Building at 220 S. Jefferson Ave.
The reason for the pending moves was described as financial. There was no mention of crime in the downtown area playing a role in the decision.
The process, which could take a year, will allow for the state to consolidate unused or under-used office space affecting employees in at least 12 state agencies, including the Department of Corrections, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Department of Labor.

Proceeds from the sale of the two buildings will be used to purchase the facility in Chesterfield, said Brian Yansen, director of facilities management for the governor’s Office of Administration.


Cost estimates for the sale and possible purchase were not disclosed.
Office of Administration Commissioner Ken Zellers said the state believes it would cost $23 million to maintain and repair the Wainwright, which the state bought 50 years ago during former Gov. Christopher “Kit” Bond’s administration.
The Mill Creek building, which sits on 4.25 acres near the intersection of Jefferson and Market Street, was built in 1975. A buyer has expressed interest in purchasing the facility, Yansen said.


Not all workers affected by the sales will move out of downtown, said OA spokesman Chris Moreland. Employees in the Missouri Department of Corrections probation and parole division will stay in the city’s core, as will some Department of Social Services workers, he said.

“There are so many moving parts,” Zellers said. “We want to do what makes sense.”

The Wainwright Building, designed by Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler, was built in the 1890s and is among the world's first skyscrapers.
The 10-story Wainwright building is considered the forerunner of the first skyscrapers in St. Louis when the structure designed by Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler opened in 1892.  It is a designated historic landmark.

In 1974, Bond helped pave the way for its purchase as a way to boost downtown St. Louis. At the time, Democratic leaders in the Legislature wanted to buy a building in midtown near St. Louis University to help that part of the city.

In 2019, Parson rejected a request by some state workers to move out of the downtown area because of concerns about crime.

A spokesman said at the time the move was not a priority, but the possibility of an exodus of workers set off alarm bells for downtown boosters and elected officials who represent the area.
Although the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant reduction in foot traffic in the area, crime has been a recurring theme in the exodus of workers from downtown. Last weekend, a shooting marked the ninth homicide already this year in the Downtown and Downtown West neighborhoods, according to city police crime records. There were only six all of last year, and in 2022, there were nine total. 


In addition to the symbolism of Parson moving workers out of the heart of the state’s economic engine, the move also could cost the city by reducing the amount it receives from its 1 percent earnings tax on people who work in the city.

City officials could not immediately be reached for comment.
Brutal news. You couldn’t sum up the States support of the City/DT better than moving 600 workers out to Chesterfield.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 02, 2024#3

Jerks. Financial reasons? The state is rolling in cash.

And a great time to put office space on the market.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostJul 02, 2024#4

The state of Missouri is the worst thing to ever happen to St. Louis city. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 02, 2024#5

About 80% of the land at 220 S Jefferson is wasted. Let's hope the interested buyer is thinking about redevelopment.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 03, 2024#6

quincunx wrote:
Jul 02, 2024
About 80% of the land at 220 S Jefferson is wasted. Let's hope the interested buyer is thinking about redevelopment.
agreed.  I actually support the state selling 220 S Jefferson.  Would prefer the jobs be relocated in down but that property should be redeveloped.  The state leaving the Wainwright building is a slap in the face to St. louis and puts at risk one of the most important architectural building in the state and I'll even say the nation.  At least if the claims of it being the 'first skyscraper' have any merit.

1,797
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,797

PostJul 03, 2024#7

If you consider a skyscraper to be an architectural term of art, and not just a tall building, it has plenty of merit.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 03, 2024#8

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Jul 03, 2024
If you consider a skyscraper to be an architectural term of art, and not just a tall building, it has plenty of merit.
I don't presume to fully understand the merit of the claim and defer to those with expertise on the building.  In general i think it is an important example of an important transitional period in American architecture.

1,797
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,797

PostJul 03, 2024#9

Maybe you could defer to FLW who called it “the first human expression of a tall steel office building as architecture”? Wright worked for Sullivan as young man around this period.

2
New MemberNew Member
2

PostJul 03, 2024#10

STLEnginerd wrote:
Jul 03, 2024
JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Jul 03, 2024
If you consider a skyscraper to be an architectural term of art, and not just a tall building, it has plenty of merit.
I don't presume to fully understand the merit of the claim and defer to those with expertise on the building.  In general i think it is an important example of an important transitional period in American architecture.
To explain why the Wainwright was a turning point in design, I always contrast it with the Security Building:



There's a nice strong base, then more base? The middle three floors with the arches on top are nice. Then there's a plain floor above the arches for no reason. There's a decent cornice but then there's two more floors thrown on top of that. Then another cornice. Then a weird attic. Also the arches are only in the middle like it's the front porch of a library or church.
This was how most tall buildings were being designed at time, even by prominent architects. They just kept adding more layers to the sandwich instead of stepping back and getting a holistic view.


The Wainwright was the first building where the architect treated it as a tall repetitive structure. Sullivan wanted to treat it like a column. A solid base, a tall middle portion, and a decorative top. That repetition also spread horizontally.

114
Junior MemberJunior Member
114

PostJul 03, 2024#11

Call me an optimist, but I can't imagine a building like  Wainwright sitting empty for more than a few years unless the economy really tanks . The original building  seems like low hanging fruit to convert condos/ apartments / hotel with not very much effort. Its certainly much easier to redevelop than the AT&T building if I had to take a guess. (As for the newer 1980s addition wouldn't mind seeing that be raised for a taller condo tower personally)

736
Senior MemberSenior Member
736

PostJul 03, 2024#12

600 workers leaving. Unbelievable

2,713
Life MemberLife Member
2,713

PostJul 03, 2024#13

RockChalkSTL wrote:
Jul 02, 2024
The state of Missouri is the worst thing to ever happen to St. Louis city. 
Maybe they're preparing to trade the best 63 square miles of Missouri to the best state in the Midwest (Illinois). How pleasant the thought... "State of Illinois at Wainwright" 

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostJul 03, 2024#14

addxb2 wrote:
Jul 03, 2024
RockChalkSTL wrote:
Jul 02, 2024
The state of Missouri is the worst thing to ever happen to St. Louis city. 
Maybe they're preparing to trade the best 63 square miles of Missouri to the best state in the Midwest (Illinois). How pleasant the thought... "State of Illinois at Wainwright" 
Gross

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 03, 2024#15

So does the fact that the proceeds of the sale will go toward the purchase of the new offices makes the whole thing suspect.  Will they move prior to closing on a sale?  What if they don't get enough from a sale.  Is the chesterfield building already identified?  Considering what was offered for AT&T i feel like they may be in for some disappointment.

If there is truly a mold problem in the Wainwright then it fair to say they need to address it ASAP.  Ideally they would move the offices within downtown to fill some unused space and so they could address any mold issues.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 12, 2024#16

From The Architect's Newspaper:

“The state is an appropriate owner of architectural heritage, and in some cases is relied upon to be the owner of last resort,” Solomon told AN. “It’s a shame that after saving the Wainwright Building from demolition, the mechanisms to ensure its preservation as an anchor of downtown St. Louis seem to be outside the scope of the state’s understanding of its own role and responsibilities.”

https://www.archpaper.com/2024/07/louis ... +weathered

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 12, 2024#17

Quick slap a statue of General Lee on it.

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostJul 12, 2024#18

Joseph Siry reports in his book on Unity Temple that Wright wanted to use crushed red granite aggregate (used in the Wainwright), but the board rejected it as too expensive.

79
New MemberNew Member
79

PostJul 12, 2024#19

hebeters wrote:
Jul 12, 2024
Joseph Siry reports in his book on Unity Temple that Wright wanted to use crushed red granite aggregate (used in the Wainwright), but the board rejected it as too expensive.
Wainwright would have been uniquely located in time and place to be able to get plenty of Missouri red granite I would think.  Its too bad about the temple that would have been a nice touch. 

9,590
Life MemberLife Member
9,590

PostAug 30, 2024#20

Sold for $8.4m

511
Senior MemberSenior Member
511

PostAug 30, 2024#21

Hopefully it’s future is solid

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostAug 30, 2024#22

Chris Stritzel wrote:
Aug 30, 2024
Hopefully it’s future is solid
I would expect a solid future from anyone willing to spend $8.4 million. This is a no-brainer residential conversion.

9,590
Life MemberLife Member
9,590

PostAug 30, 2024#23

It will be apartments...probably 120-140 units can fit in the 250,000 SF (old and new portion)

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostAug 30, 2024#24

It would be fun to live in such a notable building, nice to see a plan in place for it so quickly

959
Super MemberSuper Member
959

PostAug 31, 2024#25


Read more posts (25 remaining)