Tapatalk

I-64 Kingshighway to Jefferson

I-64 Kingshighway to Jefferson

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 08, 2021#1

MODoT is looking for a consultant to do a Planning and Environmental Linkages study I-64 from Kingshighway to Jefferson. This hopefully might lead to redoing the Market/Compton/FPA interchange.

https://www.modot.org/sites/default/fil ... 20City.pdf

9,565
Life MemberLife Member
9,565

PostOct 08, 2021#2

quincunx wrote:
Oct 08, 2021
MODoT is looking for a consultant to do a Planning and Environmental Linkages study I-64 from Kingshighway to Jefferson. This hopefully might lead to redoing the Market/Compton/FPA interchange.

https://www.modot.org/sites/default/fil ... 20City.pdf
MoDOT would like to dump some of the land it owns there and have it developed

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostOct 08, 2021#3

Great idea. A lot of waste and poor design in that stretch. 

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostOct 08, 2021#4

quincunx wrote:
Oct 08, 2021
MODoT is looking for a consultant to do a Planning and Environmental Linkages study I-64 from Kingshighway to Jefferson. This hopefully might lead to redoing the Market/Compton/FPA interchange.

https://www.modot.org/sites/default/fil ... 20City.pdf
Thanks for posting.

The document language in Scope of Services really summarizes the environment & opportunity for City and stakeholders from CORTEX, to SLU, to GRG and so on for this corridor.  Tried to copy and paste but scanned doc and couldn't pull out what I wanted emphasize.   Almost an understanding by MoDOT that one central corridor freeway in I-64 is more than enough and the redeveloping dense urban environment around demands a multimodal approach & stakeholders approach when rebuilding the outdated interchanges and outer roads... 

Piggyback on Quincunx comments, its time that Market to FPP truly becomes an at grade treelined multimodal blvd with a great opportunity to also revisit Grand Ave on and off ramps to I-64.   All this at a time hopefully an infrastructure bill will pass by end of year and some decent fiscal budgets to push reinvestments in urban areas instead of simply more bypasses.  

9,565
Life MemberLife Member
9,565

PostApr 29, 2022#5


5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostApr 29, 2022#6

^ Thanks for posting,

Easy peasy, got my plan based on 1) Redo Grand/I64 intersection 2) City makes Grand/FPP an at grade intersection and 3) do away with Market/FPP/I64 interachnage and replace w Market/FPP blvd.   I guess the other item once those three items are done, do you really need Vande/I64 connections?

7,809
Life MemberLife Member
7,809

PostApr 29, 2022#7

dredger wrote:
Apr 29, 2022
^ Thanks for posting,

Easy peasy, got my plan based on 1) Redo Grand/I64 intersection 2) City makes Grand/FPP an at grade intersection and 3) do away with Market/FPP/I64 interachnage and replace w Market/FPP blvd.   I guess the other item once those three items are done, do you really need Vande/I64 connections?
Are you talking removal entirely?

I will note that over the last few years the ramp from Papin to EB 40/64 seems a lot busier. If you're eastbound, plan on there being a lot of vehicles getting on. Makes exiting at Market or Grand more challenging.

I also notice they still have the WB 40/64 Market exit marked as a detour. No, it's closed for friggin good.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMay 01, 2022#8

dweebe wrote:
Apr 29, 2022
dredger wrote:
Apr 29, 2022
^ Thanks for posting,

Easy peasy, got my plan based on 1) Redo Grand/I64 intersection 2) City makes Grand/FPP an at grade intersection and 3) do away with Market/FPP/I64 interachnage and replace w Market/FPP blvd.   I guess the other item once those three items are done, do you really need Vande/I64 connections?
Are you talking removal entirely?
Not sure,  I see a lot of value in making FPP to Market from Kingshighway to Downtown  a true multimodal blvd and do away with the FPP underpass taking it below Grand as well as the whole Market Street/FPP interchange with I-64.   However, I also think that you would have to look at rebuilding the Grand/I64 Freeway giving you the capacity between Kingshighway, Grand & the rebuild Jefferson Street interchange configuration.  So that leaves the question in my mind, is the ramps revolving Boyle & Vande a benefit as is, anything that should be changed, quesiton. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMay 01, 2022#9

MoDOT to Study Possibilities, Connections, and Future of I-64 from Kingshighway to Jefferson

https://nextstl.com/2022/05/modot-to-st ... jefferson/

Website
http://future64.com/

Online Survey
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Future64Survey

535
Senior MemberSenior Member
535

PostMay 01, 2022#10

Do whatever deal with the devil and Harris Stowe you have to make please god, make this happen.


Group 18.png (614.57KiB)

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMay 01, 2022#11

Let MoDOT know that.

103
Junior MemberJunior Member
103

PostMay 02, 2022#12

RuskiSTL wrote:Do whatever deal with the devil and Harris Stowe you have to make please god, make this happen.


Group 18.png
No chance of this happening. The Cardinals just paid millions to renovate Stars Park, which is itself a very historical Negro Leagues site. Just build around it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostMay 02, 2022#13

CG91 wrote:
RuskiSTL wrote:Do whatever deal with the devil and Harris Stowe you have to make please god, make this happen.


Group 18.png
No chance of this happening. The Cardinals just paid millions to renovate Stars Park, which is itself a very historical Negro Leagues site. Just build around it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Plus you’d have to tear down Vashon. No way that should happen. It’s one of the few MCV buildings left.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

991
Super MemberSuper Member
991

PostMay 02, 2022#14

Right - there's no way they're going to do EXACTLY what RuskiSTL mocked up, but what they mocked up as a concept was also a quick MS Paint concept.  They wouldn't need to tear down Vashon or Stars Park to simply remove the spaghetti junction and just make the two roadways not connected. 

9,565
Life MemberLife Member
9,565

PostMay 02, 2022#15

one you straighten out 64, you can just leave Market as is and shoot it to connect to FP as a 1 lane road with 25 MPH, all the infield green becomes developable for uses that complement the arena and housing west of it.
Capture.PNG (1.48MiB)

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMay 02, 2022#16

I posted this up about a year or so ago.  Obviously none of this is to scale (including lane markings) and yes, FPA would need to come south around HSSU's campus.  But I left the 40 mainlines in place so the existing underpasses for the Market ramp could be used as a Theresa Street connection between the Armory area and FPA.


I left access at Grand because I don't think MoDot will be amenable to giving that up.  But I would be more than fine with an easy four way interchange at Compton instead.  I would also transition the Grand Boulevard entrances to Fordham and Council Towers to right in/right out only and move their actual entrances up to FPA.  Grand and FPA would be made at grade, etc.

991
Super MemberSuper Member
991

PostMay 02, 2022#17

Yeah, I mocked up a similar idea to Dennis and sc4mayor. There's plenty of ways to do this correctly.
Capture.png (676.03KiB)

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostMay 02, 2022#18

Harris-Stowe stands to gain quite a bit from a I-64 re-do like this. I would hope they can capitalize and elevate their local status even further. 

337
Full MemberFull Member
337

PostMay 02, 2022#19

sc4mayor wrote:I posted this up about a year or so ago.  Obviously none of this is to scale (including lane markings) and yes, FPA would need to come south around HSSU's campus.  But I left the 40 mainlines in place so the existing underpasses for the Market ramp could be used as a Theresa Street connection between the Armory area and FPA.


I left access at Grand because I don't think MoDot will be amenable to giving that up.  But I would be more than fine with an easy four way interchange at Compton instead.  I would also transition the Grand Boulevard entrances to Fordham and Council Towers to right in/right out only and move their actual entrances up to FPA.  Grand and FPA would be made at grade, etc.
I drew something like this and sent it to contacts I have at MoDot awhile ago. Only differences I did were fewer intersection lights and dedicated turn lanes instead as well as FPP as only 2 lanes with Brickline on the north side of the ROW. I agree with Compton becoming the main interchange/intersection rather than Grand. Grand ideally becomes more ped and public transit focused.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMay 02, 2022#20

^ Again, lane markings are not to scale/represent what should be.  Nor did I add any additional projects to it (like Brickline).  Just meant to be a basic mockup.

103
Junior MemberJunior Member
103

PostMay 12, 2022#21


First meeting is next Wednesday at the foundry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

7,809
Life MemberLife Member
7,809

PostMay 13, 2022#22

LArchitecture wrote:
May 02, 2022
sc4mayor wrote:I posted this up about a year or so ago.  Obviously none of this is to scale (including lane markings) and yes, FPA would need to come south around HSSU's campus.  But I left the 40 mainlines in place so the existing underpasses for the Market ramp could be used as a Theresa Street connection between the Armory area and FPA.


I left access at Grand because I don't think MoDot will be amenable to giving that up.  But I would be more than fine with an easy four way interchange at Compton instead.  I would also transition the Grand Boulevard entrances to Fordham and Council Towers to right in/right out only and move their actual entrances up to FPA.  Grand and FPA would be made at grade, etc.
I drew something like this and sent it to contacts I have at MoDot awhile ago. Only differences I did were fewer intersection lights and dedicated turn lanes instead as well as FPP as only 2 lanes with Brickline on the north side of the ROW. I agree with Compton becoming the main interchange/intersection rather than Grand. Grand ideally becomes more ped and public transit focused.
While I'd like to see that, do you really think SLU and the Grand Center powers would let that happen?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostDec 28, 2022#23

Be there!

MoDOT - MoDOT to introduce three I-64 Central Corridor improvement options at public meeting January 18

https://www.modot.org/node/27614

2,632
Life MemberLife Member
2,632

PostDec 28, 2022#24

Would this be an appropriate venue to lobby for a footbridge over 64 betweent the Foundry and Armory?

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostDec 28, 2022#25

All three options should include overhauls of the Grand/Forest Park Ave. intersection. 

Read more posts (128 remaining)