240
Junior MemberJunior Member
240

PostNov 05, 2021#3551

Ya’ll can call me whatever you want! Reality is reality! Not sorry for speaking what I see on the news and national headlines!!! STL is just a city that loves to live in the past and thats why it continues to fail. I want the city to grow and head the right direction but hiding reality doesn’t help.

I come from a place 10x worst than STL (crime) and grew up in Humboldt Park in Chicago in the 90’s when I moved to the States excuses don’t fix things! Taking action and saying the DT shouldn’t be blue collar focus opened a box of pandora! White collar meaning professionals should be the focus! Btw! White people can’t call me racist lol. That’s not how it works! Ya’ll fix everything by calling people that don’t join ya’ll mentality racist! But I can care less. I own properties in STL and ya’ll need to fix this place as I mentioned before it has so much potential but excuses and archaic mentality doesn’t let the city grow the way is supposed to.

1,797
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,797

PostNov 05, 2021#3552

A white person can absolutely call you out for racism against black folks, which you are.

I don’t have have the time or care to find it, but I clearly remember your post some pages back about how it’s time black folks quit complaining and bootstrap their way into the American Dream. That’s a hot take teaming with racism.

240
Junior MemberJunior Member
240

PostNov 05, 2021#3553

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:A white person can absolutely call you out for racism against black folks, which you are.

I don’t have have the time or care to find it, but I clearly remember your post some pages back about how it’s time black folks quit complaining and bootstrap their way into the American Dream. That’s a hot take teaming with racism.
Not! It’s reality! If us people from Africa and Caribbean can come to this country without anything and flourish so can they that were born here. Btw! I’m mixed so can’t use that black (African American) stuff on me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,797
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,797

PostNov 05, 2021#3554

Way to double down. Please feel free to move back to Chicago anytime it’s convenient for you. Or inconvenient for you - sooner the better.

240
Junior MemberJunior Member
240

PostNov 05, 2021#3555

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:Way to double down. Please feel free to move back to Chicago anytime it’s convenient for you. Or inconvenient for you - sooner the better.
You move! TF you think you are the owner of the city lol…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

268
Full MemberFull Member
268

PostNov 05, 2021#3556

JJ Taino wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
I just can’t understand why STL always falls behind and we’re losing  to cities that we should be crushing big time.
Main factors in my opinion: Fragmented local leadership, the city/county divide and the fact that MoLeg wants to spite regions of their state that don't agree with their politics.

2,056
Life MemberLife Member
2,056

PostNov 05, 2021#3557

Just to add to that... ^ I think the fact that we are "softly" moving in a positive direction despite the fragmentation is reason to believe that we have something great here, regionally, ready to take off when we all get on the same page. 

268
Full MemberFull Member
268

PostNov 05, 2021#3558

^I thought the same thing ~2008.  Hopefully I was just a little early in my thinking and it's for realz this time.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostNov 05, 2021#3559

OnTheEdge wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
^I thought the same thing ~2008.  Hopefully I was just a little early in my thinking and it's for realz this time.
Keep the faith. 

6,121
Life MemberLife Member
6,121

PostNov 05, 2021#3560

OnTheEdge wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
^I thought the same thing ~2008.  Hopefully I was just a little early in my thinking and it's for realz this time.
I think we were moving (softly) in a positive direction in 2008, but the entire country hit a nasty pothole and nearly lost a wheel as a result. Signs are hopeful that we are weathering the current disaster a little better than that one. Maybe. I think. With just a little luck.

268
Full MemberFull Member
268

PostNov 05, 2021#3561

^Eh, I more meant STL from a downtown resident's perspective then vs now.  Agree it's highly debatable where we are in steps forward or steps back.  More info: viewtopic.php?p=349468#p349468

38
New MemberNew Member
38

PostNov 06, 2021#3562

TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
Look, the point is that you can't blame crime downtown on a few hundred affordable housing units.  That is myopic at best and ignorant at worst.  Most major cities have low income housing and/or rent control in their urban area.  Blaming these 3 mid rises for downtown's crime - both real and perceived - is not based on facts or numbers.  

The facts are that most bad actors come from outside of downtown.  Period.   
Downtown & Downtown West do not have just “a few hundred” low income housing units.

Multiple projects used Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC): Arcade Building, one of the Cupples buildings & Leather Trades to name a few. And multiple buildings cater to a lower income crowd: Arcade, Leather Trades, Downtowner, Lofts @ 1000 (Merchandise Mart), & City View to name a few.

Downtown & Downtown West are also surrounded by very low income housing, much of it built by McCormack Baron — Preservation Square to the north, the old “projects” to the south of Chouteau, and obviously East St. Louis. There are also very low income housing units in Marlene Davis’ ward to the west.

I think the point of the original post is we have plenty of low income housing options in or near Downtown & Downtown West. But outside of One Cardinal Way, what “luxury” options do we have? Both for rent & for sale. We also need more new product period. Different kinds. Not just luxury and not just highrise luxury and not just for rent.

Downtown is full of old product. Besides Hupp Lofts & Monogram — and those themselves are old product (loft product), most loft renovations are now about 10+ years old.

There is also so much loft rental product that competition is fierce and many of the older buildings like Lofts @ 1000 have taken on B & C credit tenants.

Additionally, a lot of the loft product just wasn’t built that well. And a lot of it is really similar. Loft Works product is pretty nice (eg., Syndicate). McGowan Bros product is just “ok” if you ask me. Very few loft products are “high end” — and much of it is a very middle class SQ FT and cookie cutter build out. You don’t go to an NYC loft in SoHo and expect to see a 1,500 SQ FT condo that is basically a condo you could find anywhere. Sure, we need that product — but we also need some true loft style product for higher end buyers, with better finishes. Less cookie cutter stuff.

Most importantly: we need more new construction product in Downtown & Downtown West. We don’t need more loft product and more low income product. We need new construction that has a strong amenity package, like One Cardinal Way. We also need new construction midrise, new construction townhomes/row homes, new construction 4-families, … we need a diversity of housing product. Less surface parking lots. More housing options where the window locations and amenities were not predetermined by an existing historic building.

The only two proposed new product buildings aren’t even in the ground yet — and both are rental buildings.

Downtown & Downtown West need some new construction condo, townhome etc projects to bring more highly educated people in.

You can also see Downtown’s & Downtown West’s lack of higher income demographics, and just lack of a bigger population period, by the shape its retail environment is in. Mom & Pop’s are great, but look at some of the storefronts: burner cellular phone stores; cellular phone shops; no name boutiques; tons of salons & “beauty” shops; amateur hour restaurants & clubs like Reign was; fast food joints like KFC (Park Pacific) and a proposed Domino’s (Tucker & Locust) (both with s$&tty drive thrus); …

If Downtown & Downtown West could grow their demographics & population size they’d attract more neighborhood services (Walgreens; more grocery options; urban Target or like kind store; etc). A bigger, diversified population would beget more development.

We need more new housing product, better safety initiatives, and good infrastructure including bike/ped connections to reduce racing/cruising (good infrastructure that promotes connections & walking/biking around is a safety initiative that doesn’t rely on just cops) to grow Downtown.

We definitely do not need more low income & cookie cutter loft product. At least right now. I heard Railway was poised to use LIHTC. That would be a nightmare. Hopefully Butler Bros is all market rate.

PostNov 06, 2021#3563

Laife Fulk wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
Agreed JJG, and on top of it, his solution just doesn't make financial sense either.  So it's built upon some racist belief that crime only comes from a certain element AND a pretty bad understanding of basic economics.
If JJ is so wrong, then why are Tishaura Jones and Virvus Jones constantly tweeting that poverty is the father of crime?

I’m not saying all poor people commit crimes. I am saying concentrating poverty does not work. We need a larger, diverse socioeconomic population in Downtown & Downtown West.

And to do that we need more housing product types and good infrastructure, specifically bike/ped connections (within Downtown and to surrounding neighborhoods & transit), road diets & street trees.

240
Junior MemberJunior Member
240

PostNov 06, 2021#3564

Downtown1999 wrote:
TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
Look, the point is that you can't blame crime downtown on a few hundred affordable housing units.  That is myopic at best and ignorant at worst.  Most major cities have low income housing and/or rent control in their urban area.  Blaming these 3 mid rises for downtown's crime - both real and perceived - is not based on facts or numbers.  

The facts are that most bad actors come from outside of downtown.  Period.   
Downtown & Downtown West do not have just “a few hundred” low income housing units.

Multiple projects used Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC): Arcade Building, one of the Cupples buildings & Leather Trades to name a few. And multiple buildings cater to a lower income crowd: Arcade, Leather Trades, Downtowner, Lofts @ 1000 (Merchandise Mart), & City View to name a few.

Downtown & Downtown West are also surrounded by very low income housing, much of it built by McCormack Baron — Preservation Square to the north, the old “projects” to the south of Chouteau, and obviously East St. Louis. There are also very low income housing units in Marlene Davis’ ward to the west.

I think the point of the original post is we have plenty of low income housing options in or near Downtown & Downtown West. But outside of One Cardinal Way, what “luxury” options do we have? Both for rent & for sale. We also need more new product period. Different kinds. Not just luxury and not just highrise luxury and not just for rent.

Downtown is full of old product. Besides Hupp Lofts & Monogram — and those themselves are old product (loft product), most loft renovations are now about 10+ years old.

There is also so much loft rental product that competition is fierce and many of the older buildings like Lofts @ 1000 have taken on B & C credit tenants.

Additionally, a lot of the loft product just wasn’t built that well. And a lot of it is really similar. Loft Works product is pretty nice (eg., Syndicate). McGowan Bros product is just “ok” if you ask me. Very few loft products are “high end” — and much of it is a very middle class SQ FT and cookie cutter build out. You don’t go to an NYC loft in SoHo and expect to see a 1,500 SQ FT condo that is basically a condo you could find anywhere. Sure, we need that product — but we also need some true loft style product for higher end buyers, with better finishes. Less cookie cutter stuff.

Most importantly: we need more new construction product in Downtown & Downtown West. We don’t need more loft product and more low income product. We need new construction that has a strong amenity package, like One Cardinal Way. We also need new construction midrise, new construction townhomes/row homes, new construction 4-families, … we need a diversity of housing product. Less surface parking lots. More housing options where the window locations and amenities were not predetermined by an existing historic building.

The only two proposed new product buildings aren’t even in the ground yet — and both are rental buildings.

Downtown & Downtown West need some new construction condo, townhome etc projects to bring more highly educated people in.

You can also see Downtown’s & Downtown West’s lack of higher income demographics, and just lack of a bigger population period, by the shape its retail environment is in. Mom & Pop’s are great, but look at some of the storefronts: burner cellular phone stores; cellular phone shops; no name boutiques; tons of salons & “beauty” shops; amateur hour restaurants & clubs like Reign was; fast food joints like KFC (Park Pacific) and a proposed Domino’s (Tucker & Locust) (both with s$&tty drive thrus); …

If Downtown & Downtown West could grow their demographics & population size they’d attract more neighborhood services (Walgreens; more grocery options; urban Target or like kind store; etc). A bigger, diversified population would beget more development.

We need more new housing product, better safety initiatives, and good infrastructure including bike/ped connections to reduce racing/cruising (good infrastructure that promotes connections & walking/biking around is a safety initiative that doesn’t rely on just cops) to grow Downtown.

We definitely do not need more low income & cookie cutter loft product. At least right now. I heard Railway was poised to use LIHTC. That would be a nightmare. Hopefully Butler Bros is all market rate.
Thanks for explaining my point way better! I might not have the best words in english but you just cleared what I was trying to say! But I guess if you’re not part of the club of fiction they try to call you out as some here don’t like reality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostNov 06, 2021#3565

Downtown1999 wrote:
Laife Fulk wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
Agreed JJG, and on top of it, his solution just doesn't make financial sense either.  So it's built upon some racist belief that crime only comes from a certain element AND a pretty bad understanding of basic economics.
If JJ is so wrong, then why are Tishaura Jones and Virvus Jones constantly tweeting that poverty is the father of crime?

I’m not saying all poor people commit crimes. I am saying concentrating poverty does not work. We need a larger, diverse socioeconomic population in Downtown & Downtown West.

And to do that we need more housing product types and good infrastructure, specifically bike/ped connections (within Downtown and to surrounding neighborhoods & transit), road diets & street trees.
To suggest downtown is a neighborhood of concentrated poverty is laughable. It is one of the more racially, economically, and educationally diverse neighborhoods in the region. https://www.niche.com/places-to-live/n/ ... residents/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

134
Junior MemberJunior Member
134

PostNov 06, 2021#3566

OnTheEdge wrote:^I thought the same thing ~2008.  Hopefully I was just a little early in my thinking and it's for realz this time.
Thought the same back in the mid/late-90’s.

Unfortunately, this is a generational shift (and timeline).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

38
New MemberNew Member
38

PostNov 06, 2021#3567

SeattleNative wrote:
Nov 06, 2021
Downtown1999 wrote:
Laife Fulk wrote:
Nov 05, 2021
Agreed JJG, and on top of it, his solution just doesn't make financial sense either.  So it's built upon some racist belief that crime only comes from a certain element AND a pretty bad understanding of basic economics.
If JJ is so wrong, then why are Tishaura Jones and Virvus Jones constantly tweeting that poverty is the father of crime?

I’m not saying all poor people commit crimes. I am saying concentrating poverty does not work. We need a larger, diverse socioeconomic population in Downtown & Downtown West.

And to do that we need more housing product types and good infrastructure, specifically bike/ped connections (within Downtown and to surrounding neighborhoods & transit), road diets & street trees.
To suggest downtown is a neighborhood of concentrated poverty is laughable. It is one of the more racially, economically, and educationally diverse neighborhoods in the region. https://www.niche.com/places-to-live/n/ ... residents/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I said far more in my posts than Downtown was concentrated poverty. But if that’s the narrative you want to push go for it.

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostNov 06, 2021#3568

Downtown1999 wrote:
SeattleNative wrote:
Nov 06, 2021
Downtown1999 wrote: If JJ is so wrong, then why are Tishaura Jones and Virvus Jones constantly tweeting that poverty is the father of crime?

I’m not saying all poor people commit crimes. I am saying concentrating poverty does not work. We need a larger, diverse socioeconomic population in Downtown & Downtown West.

And to do that we need more housing product types and good infrastructure, specifically bike/ped connections (within Downtown and to surrounding neighborhoods & transit), road diets & street trees.
To suggest downtown is a neighborhood of concentrated poverty is laughable. It is one of the more racially, economically, and educationally diverse neighborhoods in the region. https://www.niche.com/places-to-live/n/ ... residents/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I said far more in my posts than Downtown was concentrated poverty. But if that’s the narrative you want to push go for it.
It sounded like an endorsement of JJ’s diatribe.

“If JJ is so wrong…” frames you as agreeing with his point. The whole concentrated poverty comment one was weird because it has no application for Downtown. It’s irrelevant to the reality of living downtown. We already do have a diverse socioeconomic population downtown that is actively growing larger decade over decade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

240
Junior MemberJunior Member
240

PostNov 06, 2021#3569

SeattleNative wrote:
Downtown1999 wrote:
SeattleNative wrote:
Nov 06, 2021
To suggest downtown is a neighborhood of concentrated poverty is laughable. It is one of the more racially, economically, and educationally diverse neighborhoods in the region. https://www.niche.com/places-to-live/n/ ... residents/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I said far more in my posts than Downtown was concentrated poverty. But if that’s the narrative you want to push go for it.
It sounded like an endorsement of JJ’s diatribe.

“If JJ is so wrong…” frames you as agreeing with his point. The whole concentrated poverty comment one was weird because it has no application for Downtown. It’s irrelevant to the reality of living downtown. We already do have a diverse socioeconomic population downtown that is actively growing larger decade over decade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Downtown is not diverse just black and white. Two your link proves my point residents Downtown earn lower than the national average. I guess there’s standards for diversity but black and white is not diverse. Seattle, Chicago, NYC are diverse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

805
Super MemberSuper Member
805

PostNov 06, 2021#3570

JJ Taino wrote:
SeattleNative wrote:
Downtown1999 wrote: I said far more in my posts than Downtown was concentrated poverty. But if that’s the narrative you want to push go for it.
It sounded like an endorsement of JJ’s diatribe.

“If JJ is so wrong…” frames you as agreeing with his point. The whole concentrated poverty comment one was weird because it has no application for Downtown. It’s irrelevant to the reality of living downtown. We already do have a diverse socioeconomic population downtown that is actively growing larger decade over decade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Downtown is not diverse just black and white. Two your link proves my point residents Downtown earn lower than the national average. I guess there’s standards for diversity but black and white is not diverse. Seattle, Chicago, NYC are diverse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seattle is one of the whitest cities in America and has pushed out almost all of its low income residents. Cmon now. You can’t really believe the stuff you say. If you want downtown to look like Seattle, you’re pretty clearly advocating for displacement and gentrification on an alarming scale. And if you look at downtown’s incomes it is approximate to the national median and has a fairly nice bell curve representing all income levels. More neighborhoods in STL should be striving for that. Not less.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

240
Junior MemberJunior Member
240

PostNov 06, 2021#3571

SeattleNative wrote:
JJ Taino wrote:
SeattleNative wrote: It sounded like an endorsement of JJ’s diatribe.

“If JJ is so wrong…” frames you as agreeing with his point. The whole concentrated poverty comment one was weird because it has no application for Downtown. It’s irrelevant to the reality of living downtown. We already do have a diverse socioeconomic population downtown that is actively growing larger decade over decade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Downtown is not diverse just black and white. Two your link proves my point residents Downtown earn lower than the national average. I guess there’s standards for diversity but black and white is not diverse. Seattle, Chicago, NYC are diverse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seattle is one of the whitest cities in America and has pushed out almost all of its low income residents. Cmon now. You can’t really believe the stuff you say. If you want downtown to look like Seattle, you’re pretty clearly advocating for displacement and gentrification on an alarming scale. And if you look at downtown’s incomes it is approximate to the national median and has a fairly nice bell curve representing all income levels. More neighborhoods in STL should be striving for that. Not less.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Most thriving neighborhoods in STL have a higher income and more professionals. I know ya’ll don’t like this but more productive residents with higher incomes brings crime down. The mayor of STL says it all the time and most politicians with a brain as well. I do get your point don’t get me wrong but Downtown should be the core of urban living with professionals. There should be more than loft living. Other than One Cardinal Way there hasn’t been any new projects. Butler Brothers and 1801 hopefully helps brings more professionals but as of now its the same story for decades from what I’ve read online. My first point with the super low cost of living is that the cost of living proves that Downtown as of now is not a desire neighborhood like CWE, The Grove and Soulard (which they have new developments left to right). I wish it was and that’s my goal or hopes. But saying for decades that is going to change and hide the fact that for a Downtown crime rates are super high does not help. Reality is that crime dictates the COL in the area. Bringing new blood and professionals is the answer. Either we like it or not to make STL a competitive city we need to make the central corridor more professional oriented. Don’t have anything against poor people like other have stated but DT and the central corridor can’t have it both ways. DT is already surrounded by land that can be developed for affordable housing and around downtown there’s plenty of affordable housing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

38
New MemberNew Member
38

PostNov 06, 2021#3572

SeattleNative wrote:
Nov 06, 2021
JJ Taino wrote:
SeattleNative wrote: It sounded like an endorsement of JJ’s diatribe.

“If JJ is so wrong…” frames you as agreeing with his point. The whole concentrated poverty comment one was weird because it has no application for Downtown. It’s irrelevant to the reality of living downtown. We already do have a diverse socioeconomic population downtown that is actively growing larger decade over decade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Downtown is not diverse just black and white. Two your link proves my point residents Downtown earn lower than the national average. I guess there’s standards for diversity but black and white is not diverse. Seattle, Chicago, NYC are diverse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seattle is one of the whitest cities in America and has pushed out almost all of its low income residents. Cmon now. You can’t really believe the stuff you say. If you want downtown to look like Seattle, you’re pretty clearly advocating for displacement and gentrification on an alarming scale. And if you look at downtown’s incomes it is approximate to the national median and has a fairly nice bell curve representing all income levels. More neighborhoods in STL should be striving for that. Not less.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh Jesus, here we go with the St. Louis gentrification bs. Seattle & St. Louis are nothing alike in that respect. Downtown & the City of St. Louis itself do not have a land scarcity issue, nor do they have a lack of low income housing options.

PostNov 06, 2021#3573

Downtown St. Louis condo sales by SQ FT & year:

2008 - $162
2009 - $137
2010 - $131
2011 - $110
2012 - $112
2013 - $117
2014 - $124
2015 - $124
2016 - $121
2017 - $125
2018 - $119
2019 - $117
2020 - $121
2021 - $124

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 06, 2021#3574

I, too, would like to see continued market-rate growth downtown, including new construction, but I am shocked by the pissing on the LIHTC program that was so vital to Downtown and Downtown West becoming truly mixed-use neighborhoods and revitalizing numerous vacant historic buildings.  I mean, c'mon, the Arcade Building e.g. was vacant since 1978, and its revitalization that was dependent upon  a combo of restricted units (targeted at artists) and market rate units (I see 1 bdrms start at $1,497/mo.) is a success story that should be applauded.  And to read it would be a "nightmare" if Railway Exchange utilizes some LIHTC to help it get back online is just incomprehensible to me. (ftr there is no application in for state or fed LITHC.)  And while at least two downtown developments that utilized LIHTC as part of their re-birth have exited their obligations in the past couple years, there have been no new LIHTC projects in Downtown/Downtown West since I believe the Liggett and Arcade buildings over 5 years ago now.  

And in terms of downtown population growth, DT/DTW together added more people than CWE/FPSE last decade but it did so while being much more reflective of the city's overall population than those core Eds & Meds dominated neighborhoods. And although it has a significantly  higher % of adults with college degrees (60%+ have college degrees) and a much lower poverty level than the city average, it's very well-balanced in terms of the city's overall racial and economic make-up compared to our other growing neighborhoods and I hope it can continue to do that.

268
Full MemberFull Member
268

PostNov 06, 2021#3575

Downtown1999 wrote:
Nov 06, 2021
Downtown St. Louis condo sales by SQ FT & year:

2008 - $162
2009 - $137
2010 - $131
2011 - $110
2012 - $112
2013 - $117
2014 - $124
2015 - $124
2016 - $121
2017 - $125
2018 - $119
2019 - $117
2020 - $121
2021 - $124
I rest my case.

Read more posts (4362 remaining)