738
Senior MemberSenior Member
738

PostOct 02, 2019#351

Was there not some/all retirement apts in that building?  And why not add some retirement apts in the new mix?

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 02, 2019#352

^Yes, it was all retirement apartments, until Pyramid kicked everyone out to start their renovation...

And why not retirement apartments?
That incubator space is part of what makes Alterra a different type of developer, he said. It's a non-traditional tenant, even risky given the nature of startups, but one that can change the energy of the building and surrounding neighborhood."
'Cuz lots of snoozing retired people aren't going to "change the energy of the building and surrounding neighborhood".  Also, most retired people are not interested in living downtown, unless they are huge Cardinals fans and can afford One Cardinal Way.  Or, unless they have few other choices outside of downtown, which would also mean they wouldn't be able to afford a renovated Jefferson Arms.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostOct 10, 2019#353

urbanitas wrote:^Yes, it was all retirement apartments, until Pyramid kicked everyone out to start their renovation...

And why not retirement apartments?
That incubator space is part of what makes Alterra a different type of developer, he said. It's a non-traditional tenant, even risky given the nature of startups, but one that can change the energy of the building and surrounding neighborhood."
'Cuz lots of snoozing retired people aren't going to "change the energy of the building and surrounding neighborhood".  Also, most retired people are not interested in living downtown, unless they are huge Cardinals fans and can afford One Cardinal Way.  Or, unless they have few other choices outside of downtown, which would also mean they wouldn't be able to afford a renovated Jefferson Arms.
This is inaccurate. One of the largest demos of people moving/living Downtown is retirees.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

738
Senior MemberSenior Member
738

PostOct 10, 2019#354

"This is inaccurate. One of the largest demos of people moving/living Downtown is retirees." Thank You I knew I was spot on!  Again the Jefferson could potentially be a great mix of residential demographics.

692
Senior MemberSenior Member
692

PostMar 19, 2020#355

Didn't see this posted elsewhere.
Top St. Louis officials oppose Jefferson Arms developer’s request for 3-year extension

ST. LOUIS — The city’s top three elected officials on Wednesday opposed a developer’s request for a three-year extension of the deadline for rehabbing the long-vacant Jefferson Arms building downtown.

While the unanimous vote by the Board of Estimate and Apportionment signaled members’ displeasure with the years of delays in the $104 million project, it doesn’t necessarily kill it.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... f4c82.html

738
Senior MemberSenior Member
738

PostMar 19, 2020#356

This project and numerous other projects e.g. Boulevard II YMCA are not going anywhere anytime soon nor in the foreseeable future 

2,626
Life MemberLife Member
2,626

PostMar 19, 2020#357

RIP. The Unbuilt St. Louis thread is unfortunately going to be getting active here pretty soon

1,677
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,677

PostMar 20, 2020#358

And yet they give Northside yet another extension? This is a joke.  At least some work has been done on the site.

952
Super MemberSuper Member
952

PostOct 17, 2020#359

Jefferson Arms is a huge project
Anyone know what shape is the building in roof etc?

9,552
Life MemberLife Member
9,552

PostOct 17, 2020#360

chris fuller wrote:
Oct 17, 2020
Jefferson Arms is a huge project
Anyone know what shape is the building in roof etc?
It has trees growing on it.....
I’ll take a closer took from my roof when I go to the gym later today

PostOct 17, 2020#361

Some of it (eastern side facing Tucker) looks ok? Near side looks bad (with the trees)
54538252-23B8-40DE-985B-7BBA4AAB7E0E.jpeg (2.27MiB)

405
Full MemberFull Member
405

PostOct 18, 2020#362

Maybe it's just one of those green roofs.  🤔

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 18, 2020#363

^^That wing of the building was a much later addition, so probably cheaper construction than the original. I'm not sure when the addition was built, but it was definitely after the Shell building opened in 1926:



Edit: The addition was built in 1928 right before the Crash. Thank you, Wikipedia.

PostOct 18, 2020#364

Also: I did not realize that parking garage was built the same time as the addition, which would make it an...historic parking garage...

So, if some owner decides that they want to demo the parking garage at some point...would preservationists rally to save it?  🤔

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostOct 19, 2020#365

It is a pretty parking garage.

226
Junior MemberJunior Member
226

PostOct 19, 2020#366

Soooo what’s the latest on the redevelopment. Last I heard...


https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... f4c82.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3,964
Life MemberLife Member
3,964

PostOct 20, 2020#367

Some news.

Alterra Worldwide has reached an agreement to employ local labor unions for its more than $100 million redevelopment of the Jefferson Arms building in downtown St. Louis. 
Alterra has been in a yearslong dispute with labor organizations over the redevelopment of Jefferson Arms, with labor officials alleging Alterra intended to use out-of-state workers and was not likely to use union workers.
On Monday the St. Louis-Kansas City Carpenters Regional Council said in a release this week that Alterra has agreed to "exclusively" use union labor to redevelop the building pending the extension of $20 million in tax increment financing due to expire at the end of 2020.
In March, Alterra had asked the city of St. Louis' Board of Estimate and Apportionment, comprised of Mayor Lyda Krewson, President of the Board of Aldermen Lewis Reed and Comptroller Darlene Green, to extend its TIF in order to close on financing. The board unanimously declined that request. 
Jacob Long, spokesman for Krewson, told the Business Journal that Alterra has not yet to returned to the city or its economic development arm, St. Louis Development Corp., with new plans.

https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... yptr=yahoo

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 20, 2020#368

Well that's a big step, anyway. 

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostOct 20, 2020#369

^ Yep.  I would imagine the city would be receptive to extending the TIF now that a deal has been worked out with local labor unions.

Would be nice to see this one get going...

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 20, 2020#370

This is good news to see. We need to get it going and with this agreement being made, it does give me some hope that it will happen. However, I wonder if any aspects of the project have changed. Like, I wonder if the hotel was dumped in favor of more apartments.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostOct 20, 2020#371

^ Might not be the worst idea to dump the hotel right now for more apartments.  I know pre-Covid demand was pretty strong, even with all the new hotels being built...but I wonder how long it'll be before we get back to those occupancy rates.  Is the Shell hotel conversion still moving along?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 20, 2020#372

sc4mayor wrote:
Oct 20, 2020
^ Might not be the worst idea to dump the hotel right now for more apartments.  I know pre-Covid demand was pretty strong, even with all the new hotels being built...but I wonder how long it'll be before we get back to those occupancy rates.  Is the Shell hotel conversion still moving along?
Shell is On Hold until at least early 2021 based on bidding stuff. Some people say later but I don't know. Construction elevator is still up for that.

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 20, 2020#373

There's no way this ($100 million+ project) happens with only residential, unless they can somehow renovate the building in sections/phases or the labor unions are willing to invest a big chunk of their own money...

6,119
Life MemberLife Member
6,119

PostOct 21, 2020#374

^I sincerely hope they save the ballroom. This may well be a pipe dream, as there may not be enough demand for one, but . . . I still hope they can. That's a gorgeous space and I've been drooling over it since those pictures first came out.

2,626
Life MemberLife Member
2,626

PostOct 21, 2020#375

Even if construction started today, this is a long haul project. Even the least optimistic estimates have COVID subsiding by early 2022 which is probably before construction would finish. I don't see why hotel demand wouldn't return when COVID is in the rearview, especially if it takes down some of downtowns other hotels in the meantime.

If you have the cash to build a hotel, today may be the best day to break ground.

Read more posts (371 remaining)