sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMar 03, 2019#1451

I wouldn't base floor count on the price tag. Just because they spent $100 million on Mid Campus (an office building) doesn't mean $300 million is going to double that height. We're talking about a neuroscience lab here, it's not just the building that could be be expensive, but all the equipment and finishing touches inside of it as well, which will be a hell of a lot more advanced then the administrative offices at Mid Campus. Washington University just spent $240 million on the East Campus renewal and didn't build a single high-rise.

My guess is there will be a little height, but this is a big lot as well. I could see multiple (like Chris said, maybe two) buildings between 5 and 10-12 floors. I can't however see a 25+ story neuroscience lab. High cost doesn't necessarily translate to more height, especially when building a high tech scientific space.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostMar 03, 2019#1452

^^ yeah there's zero chance of a 25-story anything. like Mayor said, lab space is expensive--lots of specialized systems and backup systems that you don't have in an office building. i'm guessing this development will comprise 2 or 3 six-ish story buildings similar to the McKinley Research Bldg at Taylor and McKinley on the med school campus.


2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostMar 03, 2019#1453

^ gosh I'm so old I remember when that McKinley Building was such a big deal when built and now it'd be just another day of the week in a booming area.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 03, 2019#1454

Indeed, no way a tower. The site is about 4.5 acres.
300,000,000/4.5/43560 = $1530/ sq ft of land.
Lab space is $500/sf? So three stories. 4-5 to account for the land they'll waste on green space.
Remember NGA is a "$1.7B" project wherein $700M is the building and the rest in equipment.

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostMar 04, 2019#1455

quincunx wrote:
Mar 03, 2019
Indeed, no way a tower. The site is about 4.5 acres.
300,000,000/4.5/23560 = $1530/ sq ft of land.
Lab space is $500/sf? So three stories. 4-5 to account for the land they'll waste on green space.
Remember NGA is a "$1.7B" project wherein $700M is the building and the rest in equipment.
Can you explain your math? What is the "23560" number? And how did you get to 3 stories?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 04, 2019#1456

Oh sorry typo
$300M / 4.5 acres / 43560 square feet per acre.

595
Senior MemberSenior Member
595

PostMar 04, 2019#1457

This is what I was thinking that a 20+ floor building would be very out of context for Cortex.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostMar 04, 2019#1458

quincunx wrote:
Mar 03, 2019
Indeed, no way a tower. The site is about 4.5 acres.
300,000,000/4.5/43560 = $1530/ sq ft of land.
Lab space is $500/sf? So three stories. 4-5 to account for the land they'll waste on green space.
Remember NGA is a "$1.7B" project wherein $700M is the building and the rest in equipment.
I still think it will be taller. This 130,000SF Neuroscience Building was completed in the Twin Cities area (St. Paul MN to be specific) in 2017 for $75 Million. It is 5 floors. A 3-floor parking garage is connected to it...
https://www.twincities.com/2017/04/03/7 ... -corridor/


Then this one started in late 2017 in Pasadena California at Caltech. This is 135,000SF spread out over 3 floors. This one has no parking garage. Cost: $175 Million
http://www.saifulbouquet.com/portfolio/ ... h-building


This next one is 12 floors, includes two wings and is under construction at the University of California San Francisco. The cost is $237 Million. There is an existing parking lot next door that will not be developed as part of this project in San Francisco.
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisc ... n-bay.html


Because ours is expected to be $63 Million more than UCSF and include a parking garage, my final guess is a 8-10 floor building with a parking podium meaning that actual lab space is 6 floors. The design will be ok. Nothing breakthrough or special. It will be more along the lines of the Mid Campus Center.

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostMar 04, 2019#1459

quincunx wrote:
Mar 04, 2019
Oh sorry typo
$300M / 4.5 acres / 43560 square feet per acre.
I still don't understand how this math shows how large the building will be. Do you mind explaining further? I don't mean to be irritating, just want to understand.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 04, 2019#1460

I'm putting a lower bound on the building height from the parcel size and an estimate of the per sq foot costs of the building.
A $500 per square foot building that covers 100% of the parcel would be 3 stories
75% 4 stories
60% 5 stories

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostMar 05, 2019#1461

quincunx wrote:
Mar 04, 2019
I'm putting a lower bound on the building height from the parcel size and an estimate of the per sq foot costs of the building.
A $500 per square foot building that covers 100% of the parcel would be 3 stories
75% 4 stories
60% 5 stories
Very clever. Thank you for the explanation.

75
New MemberNew Member
75

PostMar 05, 2019#1462

The garage could take up a big chunk of that site. Will be around 2k spots.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 05, 2019#1463

Oh boy, more wealth thrown away. I hope some TIF money pays for it so once again SLPS school kids loose out for parking that drivers refuse pay for.

75
New MemberNew Member
75

PostMar 06, 2019#1464

quincunx wrote:
Mar 05, 2019
Oh boy, more wealth thrown away. I hope some TIF money pays for it so once again SLPS school kids loose out for parking that drivers refuse pay for.
Not a fan either, but Washu does charge for parking (around $80/month), unlike BJ.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostMar 06, 2019#1465

^ also there won't be any property taxes paid regardless of parking garage size.

1,678
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,678

PostMar 06, 2019#1466

gopherlou wrote:
Mar 05, 2019
The garage could take up a big chunk of that site. Will be around 2k spots.
And all mere blocks from a shiny new public mass transit stop.

When will it end?

2,056
Life MemberLife Member
2,056

PostMar 06, 2019#1467

To build on those earlier calculations cause its fun...
The site is about 4.5 acres. $300,000,000/4.5/43560 = $1530/ sq ft of land.
$280M Budget / 3.0 / 43560 . (Take out a 3rd of the parcel (1.5 acres) for parking garage $20M // green-space)
= $2142/ sq ft of land
Add a lobby in there and ur around $2250 / sq ft of land...

Maybe looking at 4-5 stories at 100% of the remaining parcel
80% = 5-6 stories
70% = 6-7 stories
50% = 9 stories

quincunx did I do that right?

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostMar 07, 2019#1468

bwcrow1s wrote:
Mar 06, 2019
gopherlou wrote:
Mar 05, 2019
The garage could take up a big chunk of that site. Will be around 2k spots.
And all mere blocks from a shiny new public mass transit stop.

When will it end?
The same transit stop that isn't open yet?

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMar 07, 2019#1469

The Cortex station opened last year...

The CWE platform is only partially closed. Both nearby stations are operational.

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostMar 09, 2019#1470

The Mayor wrote:
Mar 07, 2019
The Cortex station opened last year...

The CWE platform is only partially closed. Both nearby stations are operational.
Gotcha. Thanks.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 09, 2019#1471

Permit issued for parking lot at 4353 Duncan. $615k plus $142k for demo.

6,120
Life MemberLife Member
6,120

PostMar 10, 2019#1472

I won't say that the building is all that, but . . . grr. :( Four of the eight surrounding parcels are already surface lots. That's just dumb.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostMar 11, 2019#1473

Yesterday (March 9th)...

Aloft Hotel



Crescent Building

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMar 11, 2019#1474

symphonicpoet wrote:
Mar 10, 2019
I won't say that the building is all that, but . . . grr. :( Four of the eight surrounding parcels are already surface lots. That's just dumb.
Optimistic spin on this, if I got address right in Google Maps, is this lot is in part to replace surface lot for Cortex I in the anticipated mixed use residential going in. Bigger lot getting a bigger building and a smaller building being replaced by a small surface lot.

Understand, plenty of surface lots to go around but thinking in terms of the possibility that both Cortex I mixed use and the next Wexford building are coming together sooner than later.

6,120
Life MemberLife Member
6,120

PostMar 11, 2019#1475

I hope you're right. (And that does make a bit of sense.) But man, it's past time to ditch the parking minimums. And also to maybe go more structured right around there.

Read more posts (1061 remaining)