Just says it was filed.
The other project that was filled was the 100
The other project that was filled was the 100
One Hundred, Jefferson Arms projects to start construction in early 2018 - St. Louis Business Journal
Dec. 18th, 2017
Send to Kindle
Building permits for two high-profile projects in the city of St. Louis have been filed by their respective developers, signaling construction is imminent.
On Dec. 13, New Jersey-based Mac Properties and Antheus Capital applied for a $9.1 million building permit to start foundation work for its planned $130 million apartment high-rise in the Central West End at 100 Kingshighway Blvd.
Then two days later, Dallas-based Alterra Worldwide applied for a $104 million building permit for its historic redevelopment of the Jefferson Arms building, 415 N. Tucker Blvd., in downtown St. Louis.
Officials behind both projects have said they expect to start construction in early 2018.
The 36-story tower in the Central West End, called One Hundred, is being designed by architecture firm Studio Gang and will include 316 apartments with about 2,000 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor.
Construction is expected to be complete in spring 2020. The city of St. Louis is helping finance the project by issuing $118 million in industrial revenue bonds. Eli Ungar, principal at New Jersey-based Mac Properties, previously said subsidies would provide approximately 8 percent of the project’s cost — or about $10 million. Mac sought 95 percent tax abatement for 10 years and 50 percent abatement for five years.
One Hundred will feature 305 apartments over 540,000 square feet of space in the Central West End.
Work on the historic Jefferson Arms building will include a 200-room Marriott-branded AC Hotel and more than 200 single-family apartments to go along with retail on the street level.
Alterra is using $17.4 million in tax increment financing (TIF) to help fund the historic redevelopment. Mike Sarimsakci of Alterra said the firm also hopes to utilize between $15 million and $18 million in state historic tax credits. Federal historic tax credits are also expected to be secured, along with financing through the U.S. Department of Energy’s Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs (PACE).
Alterra International, a Dallas-based developer that has the Jefferson Arms building under contract, plans a $103.7 million redevelopment of the vacant facility in downtown St. Louis. Here's what the building looks like today.
I'd think Kwame knows better than that, but it shows up as $104,000,000 on Geo. When I get the newly issued permits every month it's always fun to go through and look at stated value in comparison to what is being done.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Dec 18, 2017I can't believe they used the actual $$$$ amount! the trick is you use half of that in the permit to save on the permit fee which is 1% of project cost![]()
but with that said, the city should be bringing in about $5.5M in permit fees just from 4 projects- this, 100, 300 and BPV2
Could you post them?TCB wrote: ↑Dec 20, 2017Latest renderings on the business journal look like there is an H&M on the southeast corner of the building. Unless that logo looks similar to one of the restaurants that’s going in.
I haven’t heard of anything beyond the furniture store and the restaurants. Maybe just a placeholder for the renderings?
dredger wrote: ↑Dec 20, 2017Biz journals article on foreign financing via visa program. Behind pay wall but sure their is plenty of successes and failures that can be cited with this program.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... reign.html
Alterra plans on using the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service EB-5 program, an investor visa program that seeks to stimulate the United States economy through investments in U.S. companies by foreign investors.
Yeah puzzled by jumping the gun on the building permit, they could have just applied for a zoning only permit without committing to a dollar amount. then the project would go through all the zoning approvals (board of adjustment hearing most likely) and get it all approved than just get a building permit when readystlien wrote: ↑Dec 21, 2017dredger wrote: ↑Dec 20, 2017Biz journals article on foreign financing via visa program. Behind pay wall but sure their is plenty of successes and failures that can be cited with this program.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... reign.html
Alterra plans on using the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service EB-5 program, an investor visa program that seeks to stimulate the United States economy through investments in U.S. companies by foreign investors.
So if the developer still needs to raise $50 million through EB-5, why would they apply for a building permit? Just curious of the order they're doing things.
Good evening.St.Louis1764 wrote: ↑Dec 21, 2017If I'm not mistaken he's done this same concept in Dallas i don't see this falling apart at all..
I don't think he's come this far to have it all fall apart. I think we all could be more confident the way developments are progressing in St.Louis.
Hello Dredgerdredger wrote: ↑Dec 21, 2017^^
My take is that the square footage and project is big enough that it is essentially a phased development in itself for which financing is coming from multiple sources or tied to specific spaces/uses. The building permit might be odd vs. not having all the funding in place. However, developer could very will be on path for securing financing to start on ground floor commercial, H&M, and the apartments next year but still securing separate finance for hotel rooms/hotel brand via visa program, vice versa. Speculation on my part but it will be interesting to hear his thoughts if he can share some more details.
It will be interesting how Jeff Arms as well as Railway Exchange play out the next year. That is a lot of square footage between the two with multiple uses to finance, rehab, build out & lease. Getting one of them to happen with BPV II & botique hotels full steam ahead will be a good year for downtown.
Hello good evening.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Dec 21, 2017Yeah puzzled by jumping the gun on the building permit, they could have just applied for a zoning only permit without committing to a dollar amount. then the project would go through all the zoning approvals (board of adjustment hearing most likely) and get it all approved than just get a building permit when readystlien wrote: ↑Dec 21, 2017dredger wrote: ↑Dec 20, 2017Biz journals article on foreign financing via visa program. Behind pay wall but sure their is plenty of successes and failures that can be cited with this program.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... reign.html
Alterra plans on using the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service EB-5 program, an investor visa program that seeks to stimulate the United States economy through investments in U.S. companies by foreign investors.
So if the developer still needs to raise $50 million through EB-5, why would they apply for a building permit? Just curious of the order they're doing things.
my guess this project still falls apart
Dear Stlienstlien wrote: ↑Dec 21, 2017dredger wrote: ↑Dec 20, 2017Biz journals article on foreign financing via visa program. Behind pay wall but sure their is plenty of successes and failures that can be cited with this program.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... reign.html
Alterra plans on using the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service EB-5 program, an investor visa program that seeks to stimulate the United States economy through investments in U.S. companies by foreign investors.
So if the developer still needs to raise $50 million through EB-5, why would they apply for a building permit? Just curious of the order they're doing things.
TCBTCB wrote: ↑Dec 20, 2017Latest renderings on the business journal look like there is an H&M on the southeast corner of the building. Unless that logo looks similar to one of the restaurants that’s going in.
I haven’t heard of anything beyond the furniture store and the restaurants. Maybe just a placeholder for the renderings?
Dear MattnSTLMattnSTL wrote: ↑Dec 18, 2017I'd think Kwame knows better than that, but it shows up as $104,000,000 on Geo. When I get the newly issued permits every month it's always fun to go through and look at stated value in comparison to what is being done.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Dec 18, 2017I can't believe they used the actual $$$$ amount! the trick is you use half of that in the permit to save on the permit fee which is 1% of project cost![]()
but with that said, the city should be bringing in about $5.5M in permit fees just from 4 projects- this, 100, 300 and BPV2
Everyone low balls permit fees, but it's really more complicated than that anyway. MEP gets separate permits, which are supposed to account for the value of that portion, so the general building permit should be lower than the overall project value. But it's just a game to see what your plan examiner will accept. They've been pushing back a little more lately on the low-balling. They pushed my garage with ADU building permit value higher than I initially told them.But what's another $100 to the Building Division among friends after already paying the $25 application fee, $200 to appeal to the Board of Adjustment, and the rest of the permit fee.
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote: ↑Dec 22, 2017-Mike,
First of all thank you for your participation and transparency on this thread. Hopefully one day all developers follow your example.
Also, do you have any updates on the 1920 S. Broadway Project? I for one am so excited to see that building come back and would seriously consider living there.
Thanks again