455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostSep 23, 2013#51

There are several heavily underutilized sites around St. Louis that would be perfect for a new college campus. St. Louis Place Park would be the perfect center for a campus. Or the blocks just north of the Fairgrounds. Or the stretch of Delmar from Debalievre to Taylor or from Taylor to Vandeventer. Or Wash ave between Jefferson and 18th. Or the riverfront along N Broadway or east of Soulard. Or the awful market street interchange. Or even Pruitt Igoe or the East St. Louis riverfront facing downtown.

Who will be the founders? Who will be the donors? I bet Busch is feeling generous and a little guilty after selling Budweiser, maybe he can be convinced to found the Busch Institute of Technology to help out his city in a time of need and secure his legacy as something other than the one who lost AB to the Belgians? I bet Scottrade or AG Edwards or Wells Fargo or the St. Louis Fed would be interested in funding an economics institute in that new college. I bet Boeing would be interested in supporting their engineering department. I bet Monsanto or Sigma-Aldrich or Purina or even AB itself would support the Biology and Chemistry departments. I bet any number of backers could be found for a computer science and telecommunications department. Downtown's growing population needs healthcare. Build a new City Hospital and put it under the care of BIT's new medical school.

What of the person in the Metro East who won hundreds of millions of dollars in the lottery recently?

Of course this is still just fantasy, but any amount of investment put into this would pay off more much more over the long term than tearing down another building or building housing projects or building another parking lot.

PostSep 25, 2013#52

Anatomy of a Public Space
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/arts-a ... pace/7003/
The Porch outside of Philadelphia's 30th Street Station has been an unambiguous success. Two years ago, traffic engineers paved over a lane of roadway in front of the train station, creating a broad sidewalk 50 feet across and 565 feet long. With about a quarter of a million dollars, the University City District organization then put out some tables and chairs, planters and umbrellas, none of it even bolted to the ground.

Since then, the space has become a popular plaza somewhere in between a pop-up park and a permanent icon like nearby Rittenhouse Square. People read books slouching in the bistro chairs. They take their lunch on The Porch. They come for the food trucks.

PostOct 02, 2013#53

Have We Reached Peak Sprawl?
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/housin ... rawl/7102/
Metropolitan Atlanta, long a symbol of car-dependent American sprawl, has recently passed a threshold where a majority of its new construction spending is now focused in high-density, "walkable" parts of town. Since 2009, 60 percent of new office, retail and rental properties in Atlanta have been built in what Christopher Leinberger calls "walkable urban places"

"This is indicative that we’re seeing the end of sprawl," says Leinberger, a research professor with the George Washington University School of Business

The average rent per square foot in the most established walkable places – the study counted 27 of them in the city and suburbs, averaging around a half square-mile in size – was about 112 percent higher than in homes, offices and stores in more classically suburban areas.
When will our metro reach Peak Sprawl? When will we realize that the cheap isolated suburbs of today will become the slums of tomorrow? When will we realize that the younger generation is rejecting their parent's McMansions en mass and that those monstrosities will be worthless in a generation?

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 03, 2013#54

We should just call this thread "interesting links from the Atlantic Cities website."

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighb ... ence/7103/

This link is to an article that discusses the bipolar crime rate in Chicago neighborhoods and its effect on policing, perception, business development, and social class. Obviously applicable to STL. The homicide rate in S. Chi is 15x higher than in N Chi. This year in STL there will be around 100 homicides, about 75 of which will be in the neighborhoods north of Delmar/Page. That part of the city has what, 100k people in it? So a murder rate of 75 in NSL. While the remaining 200k people south of that line will experience about 25 homicides, many of which are concentrated around Gravois Park, so SoSTL has a homicide rate maybe around 12/100k. Has anyone actually done this calculation based on census tracts? Mine is just a ballpark.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostOct 03, 2013#55

onecity wrote:We should just call this thread "interesting links from the Atlantic Cities website."
:D I was thinking the same thing myself. Its just too easy to find good stuff on the Atlantic Cities. I've been trying to find good articles elsewhere. Here is a decent one:

Cities Are the Fonts of Creativity
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/20 ... creativity
Roughly a third of us across the United States, and perhaps a much as half of us in our most creative cities – are able to do work which engages our creative faculties to some extent. That leaves a group that I term “the other 66 percent,” who toil in low-wage rote and rotten jobs — if they have jobs at all — in which their creativity is subjugated, ignored or wasted.
This backs something that I alluded to in an earlier post. That the primary purpose of cities is to mix people together to generate new ideas and new social connections. In this way, having us all isolated in distant residential communities and isolated working areas and isolated commutes does profound damage to what our region could otherwise accomplish. How often do you suppose somebody from Monsanto randomly meets somebody from BJC at a popular lunch spot or neighborhood pub? Or somebody from Wells Fargo and Enterprise? How often do you suppose new business ideas or connections are made from those random interactions? I'd guess its pretty rare around here compared to San Francisco or NYC.

All of this is a function of the structure of a city and its "urbanism" rather than simply what jobs or companies exist in it. One day, an economist will quantify in dollars how much potential innovation is drained out of a local economy by this kind of isolation, but I suspect it would be quite a bit.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 03, 2013#56

Every minute wasted sitting alone in traffic is a minute people aren't mixing, sharing ideas, or otherwise creating the future. There is a reason isolated places are the way they are.

542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostOct 04, 2013#57

JuanHamez wrote:I think the older generation is finally starting to realize that when they can no longer drive, they will be forced to move to a walkable urban neighborhood or go to a retirement home. Many are making the move into the cities preemptively.
The ones who are capable of rational thought.

This is not my parents (almost 75, and 72). They have lived, sequentially, in more and more sprawl-based housing "developments" for the last 40 years. When he was in gradskool in Chapel Hill (late 60s, early 70s), they lived in an apartment that had sidewalks in front of it, and you could more or less use a bicycle to go anywhere you needed to around there. They had one car, which she used to go to distant cities to do social work. By the time I was born, they lived on a cul-de-sac in a small town, but you could at least use a bike around the neighborhood. So too in Carrollton, GA, where I spent grades 2 to 7. It was not a TND paradise at all--the house was built in 1967, and there were no sidewalks, and it wasn't close to anything mixed-use. But the area was still low-speed-limit and I could at least ride my bike to the library six blocks away. In 1989, they moved to an exurban "subdivision" that killed all of that. We immediately stopped using bicycles, because the access road outside the subdivision was 55 MPH, so of course people went 68. In 1994, they moved to their current house, that is on a golf course (built 1965), five miles from anything you need except the 1759 Moravian settlement two miles away--that has a truck corridor blasted through it.

I talk about this stuff, and they can't even comprehend it. And my mom is liberal. She's bedridden (post-polio syndrome) now in her massive exurban home on an acre, but if she lived in TND, she'd have had at least an additional decade of mobility in her scooter up to about mid-2012. My father is uber-conservative and hates all public transit and visited here once and was horrified by "how close together the buildings are" in the 73XX block of Pershing in U City, near Clayton. I told him that it was a streetcar suburb and the 4-familys were built around 1920 and people still walked places then. He seemed to sort of be listening until I said the word "walked."

She can't sit up. When he can't drive anymore, they are done for. I have a son to think about. I can't just quit my job and move back to North Carolina and make sorties from their house to the grocery store five miles away. They've finally found a wonderful woman and her daughter for night care for my mom. (These gals drive, of course). My wife and I have actually talked about leaving the house to them as a thank-you when my parents are gone. My sister, who needs money more than we do, might not agree with this.

I'm glad a few old people exist who are capable of thinking rationally about TND versus sprawl. I don't know many of them.

PostOct 04, 2013#58

onecity wrote:We should just call this thread "interesting links from the Atlantic Cities website."

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighb ... ence/7103/

This link is to an article that discusses the bipolar crime rate in Chicago neighborhoods and its effect on policing, perception, business development, and social class. Obviously applicable to STL. The homicide rate in S. Chi is 15x higher than in N Chi. This year in STL there will be around 100 homicides, about 75 of which will be in the neighborhoods north of Delmar/Page. That part of the city has what, 100k people in it? So a murder rate of 75 in NSL. While the remaining 200k people south of that line will experience about 25 homicides, many of which are concentrated around Gravois Park, so SoSTL has a homicide rate maybe around 12/100k. Has anyone actually done this calculation based on census tracts? Mine is just a ballpark.
Yeah, so this. As some of y'all know, I teach a class on The Wire. Baltimore City (also divorced from its County) averages about 300 homicides a year, and StL City about 150, but they still have roughly twice the population as we do, so it's about the same per capita. In both iterations of the course, I have been blessed by the presence of a Homicide Police in StL City to talk to my students about this. They ask him a bunch of questions, and most of his answers amount to "yeah, the show is pretty realistic."

One of the things we looked at in 2012 was that, while people think the northside is some sort of monolithic war zone, that isn't the case at all. Based on the 2011 homicide data, the area between Delmar and Page is almost like whatever. It gets a little stickier between Page and MLK, but no biggie. I mean, Benton Park West is just as messy. MLK to Natural Bridge is where it escalates. and North of Natural Bridge was a mess--that year. Now, I don't know enough about the drug trade here to know if there were specific turf wars in these spots. The semester I inaugurated the course (Spring 12) I was at the Regions Bank in Wellston when some sort of sh*t popped off. I later asked my Detective acquaintance about this, and he said something like "yeah, a boss got too close to the business, and they got him in Wellston."

What's interesting to me about this is not that some random white guy (me) isn't going to get capped filling up at the Crown Mart in Wellston (which I have assumed for many years), but rather that there's territory within the territory. I'm reaching out to the CCJ peeps at UMSL to see if we can get some insight into what the heck is going on between Natural Bridge and 70.

PostOct 04, 2013#59

onecity wrote:What do you do about UMSL's terrible location? It's practically hemmed in by suburbia, highway, golfcourses, etc on all sides, such that there is almost no possibility of real student life. Its location only works as a commuter school. That more than anything in my opinion limits - severely limits - UMSL's potential.
This is all correct.

BUT

The Chancellor gave us a report that for the first time, there is a waiting list for on campus housing. This means that, despite all the obstacles created by American planners, there are still enough kids who want to live in a dorm and walk across NatBridgeRd instead of driving in an hour from their folks' house in JeffCo. Baby steps, y'all,

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostOct 05, 2013#60

Houston: The Surprising Contender in America’s Urban Revival
http://www.governing.com/topics/urban/g ... vival.html
Houston has been viewed as “the most sprawling, least dense, most automobile-dependent major city in America.” And for many years, Houstonians seemed to be perfectly content with that. But there’s evidence that’s no longer the case. The institute’s annual survey of Houston-area residents last year found that half the residents of Harris County, of which Houston is part, would prefer to live “in an area with a mix of development, including homes, shops and restaurants” as opposed to a “single-family residential area.” Even if you look at the farthest parts of the metro region—the nine counties surrounding Harris County—more than 40 percent of residents prefer the mixed-use option. The results, which are also reflected in recent development patterns, have city leaders, developers and advocates for density buzzing.

PostOct 07, 2013#61

Ailing Midwestern Cities Extend a Welcoming Hand to Immigrants
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/07/us/ai ... rants.html?
In north Dayton — until recently a post-apocalyptic landscape of vacant, gutted houses — 400 Turkish families have moved in, many coming from other American cities. Now white picket fences, new roofs and freshly painted porches are signs of a brisk urban renewal led by the immigrants, one clapboard house at a time.

“It’s all about attitude,” Mr. Shakhbandarov said. “Americans maybe have seen better days of Dayton, a better life, better economy. But we never seen that. We have learned to appreciate what we have. And what we have here is much beyond what we ever had before.”

PostOct 07, 2013#62

Very interesting article on the wild west freewheeling investment and entrepreneurial culture in San Francisco

How San Francisco’s new entrepreneurial culture is changing the country.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013 ... ntPage=all
Hwin is twenty-eight, but could be younger. He has a blissed-out grin and an impish dusting of freckles. His hair is buzzed on the sides but topped with choppy bangs, a rocker coif that makes it look as if a wad of hair just landed on his head from a great height. He often wears a miniature harmonica around his neck, over a black T-shirt, to underscore his musical affinities. For several years now, he has been working as a musician, a tech entrepreneur, and an investor in other people’s startups. His two-person band, Cathedrals, just released a début single and is producing an album in the coming months. At the moment, he and a friend are managing investments of up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in private companies.

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostOct 08, 2013#63

Life in San Francisco:

A closet-sized apartment for $1500 per month? Gas for your car at 30% higher than the national average? Three hour long commutes for the average worker to their job in Silicon Valley? Horrible commutes for everyone else? People don't know their neighbors? Boring weather? Ridiculously high taxes and a bankrupt state
government? Stepping over homeless people on your way to business meetings or your hotel lobby?

Ah, but beautiful scenery...

For that we all aspire to be San Franciscans?

I'd rather live in Pittsburgh.

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostOct 08, 2013#64

^"Boring weather"? Well if lack of ice storms and tornadoes is "boring", sign me up for that insurance seminar! :)

I do see what you're saying. I still love San Francisco. Just couldn't afford to live there.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostOct 08, 2013#65

Northside Neighbor wrote: I'd rather live in Pittsburgh.
:D I see what you did there.

In all seriousness though, I do understand your point. I personally have strongly considered moving out to SF before deciding to stay here with affordability being one of the major factors. But I know of several other people who made the opposite decision. What I wanted people to get out of that is that the creativeness in cities like SF are something that is worth aspiring to because that is what smart young people are looking for. Can you imagine a 20 year old in our region being an active artist and being a venture capitalist? I know not one.

The key thing here is to realize that there is unlikely anything unique about HIM that allows him to pull it off. It is the structure of society and the city around him (the educational resources, business environment, mentors, transportation, random interactions) that has cultivated him and mixed with some luck, allowed him to be successful.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 08, 2013#66

SF may be expensive, but it's a functioning city with numerous top flight employers, educational instutions, an extremely well educated workforce, a risktaking mindset, shoreline, great architecture, a cohesive transit system, and progressive public policy.

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostOct 08, 2013#67

San Francisco also represents a tiny fraction of the 9+ million person region it centers, most of whose residents are slaves to the automobile and their jobs. High housing costs are not limited to San Francisco, but spread throughout the entire Bay Area.

It is also a region with a highly fractured sense of community. And ironically, the places with the best real "neighborhoods", places like San Francisco, Berkeley, and Oakland, have some of the most expensive costs of entry.

Long time SF residents/non-hipster/non-tech workers loathe, hate, and despise those Google buses driving in and out of SF, as those long time folks watch as the demographic makeup of their city changes into a place of extreme wealth, few children, and the biggest visible homeless population in the country.

It's a weird place. The weather and smart people living there don't compensate for the cold weirdness. Meanwhile, "traditions"? A "sense of place"? Those are things long lost or barely existent in most of the Bay Area. Most people living there are very much experiencing a high cost, auto-dependent lifestyle, and, frankly, don't know their neighbors.

That lack of neighbor-to-neighbor connection/identity is a big part of the "cold weirdness" of the Bay Area. And there ain't nothing "high-tech" about that. That part of your quality of life, a lifestyle option very available here in the STL, is very low-tech/high touch.

Live in St. Louis, and a new creative can get engaged, make a difference, and be part of something. Move to SF and get totally lost in the crowd.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostOct 10, 2013#68

Out of curiosity, does anybody know of a premier midwest-based major cultural magazine?

The East Coast has The Atlantic and the West Coast has the Pacific Standard. Maybe I'm kind of ignorant but we don't seem to have a pre-eminent cultural magazine that discusses what is going on in our region in the context of what is going on in the rest of the world. Seems like the most influential ideas are coming from the coasts and we don't hear as many voices from the midwest not because there are no good ideas but because there is no loud and well read voice for them to speak with.

Having a brand and magazine like this would go a long way in spreading good ideas around and promoting our region to the outside world. If anybody here has connections to any media or publishing companies in the region, this would be something to look into and an idea to promote. And of course, to base it in St. Louis before Chicago comes up with a similar idea.

Urban Plains, based in Des Moines, IA is as close as I can find and they're just a startup company right now. Maybe somebody can buy them and move them here or start something similar but better. Although that magazine name is awesome, I'd prefer something that would encompass the mountain west and the south in its readership base. Something like "The Great Interior" would be reasonable.

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostOct 10, 2013#69

Juan, you seem to be searching for some kind of message or story to give voice to the Midwest or STL. What would you like to hear it say?

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 10, 2013#70

It isn't print, but MPR (of NPR) seems to produce a lot of its own programming, including Prairie Home Companion - which is about as Midwestern a voice as you can find anywhere.

PostOct 10, 2013#71

Chicago Public Radio and Ira Glass.

151
Junior MemberJunior Member
151

PostOct 11, 2013#72


455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostOct 14, 2013#73

Northside Neighbor wrote:Juan, you seem to be searching for some kind of message or story to give voice to the Midwest or STL. What would you like to hear it say?
I'm just a little frustrated that tons of great ideas get floated around locally in friend groups, or coffee shops, or forums like this, and worried that little of it ever makes it to policy makers, or planners, or the population at large. The tight social and popular media connections of the coasts allows for ideas to rapidly spread but it seems to be much more slow out here in the midwest. For instance, somebody in Baltimore can easily influence the ideas of people in Boston and other local cities by writing in the Atlantic. How can somebody in St. Louis influence what goes on in Detroit or Indianapolis or Cleveland? How can we easily learn about what good things are happening there and learn from them? I don't see many easy ways. Most educated east coast people read their local paper (or NYT/WSJ) and the Atlantic. We should have something like that too.

PostOct 14, 2013#74

Two articles today on cities that are too expensive to live in:

London's Great Exodus
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/13/opini ... xodus.html?
This is what happens when property in your city becomes a global reserve currency. For that is what property in London has become, first and foremost.

The property market is no longer about people making a long-term investment in owning their shelter, but a place for the world’s richest people to park their money at an annualized rate of return of around 10 percent. It has made my adopted hometown a no-go area for increasing numbers of the middle class.
The San Francisco Exodus
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/housin ... odus/7205/
My friends keep moving to Oakland. Gone from San Francisco for greener pastures and cheaper rents, because it’s just gotten too hard, by which I really mean too expensive. Their move signals that something has gone terribly wrong in this most progressive of American cities.
As these cities across the world become too expensive for the middle class, more affordable cities like St. Louis have the opportunity to soak up population growth that would have otherwise gone to places like SF or NYC. We need to aggressively market ourselves for this.

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostOct 14, 2013#75

People have been moving out of San Francisco for decades. And Oakland is not the answer. The entire Bay Area is outrageously expensive. California is expensive. And to find anywhere in the Golden State where you won't pay through the nose to live, you'll be neighbors with cow pastures and tumbleweeds.

And I don't buy that the message of the Midwest doesn't get out to the larger world. That's just not true. We could do better, but the info is out there. Don't be hemmed in by longing for culture and hipness on the coasts. St. Louis is what you make it.

Read more posts (1033 remaining)