And didn't KMOV just move out of that building as well?
Sounds like it might be time for a residential conversion.
Sounds like it might be time for a residential conversion.
I don’t think KMOV will move out for 6-12 months if not longer. They just closed on a new building that will take a while to retrofit into a studioRockChalkSTL wrote: ↑Aug 15, 2022And didn't KMOV just move out of that building as well?
Sounds like it might be time for a residential conversion.
Those Downtowns are all significantly bigger than STL. Even Cleveland and Cincinnati. They don't have a second skyline diluting their core.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Jul 15, 2022
Apartments aren’t the default. Have you noticed the number of new hotel units online over the last 4 years?Suburban Sprawl wrote: ↑Aug 18, 2022
I don't get how "apartments" is the default answer for everything. If I want an apartment DT today in any price bracket I'll get it, people need reasons to move there. Employers moving out does not help. Its almost like theres a theory that converting a building to apartments will fill them. Its lazy and naive.
First, DB posted something interesting on Twitter: the owner of Millennium may be planning to renovate it. A spokesperson with the ownership group behind the hotel chain stated they don't plan to sell it and do want to renovate it in a BizJ article on the code violations. Not entirely sure I believe it yet, but that's . . . interesting.GoHarvOrGoHome wrote: ↑Aug 19, 2022With all these long time albatross renovations finally getting plans, what do we have left? The to-do list gets shorter and shorter.
- Railway Exchange and associated garage
- Chemical Building
- Butler Bros
- Chouteau's Landing
- Jefferson Arms
- Buildings on 2100 block of Locust
- City Place Hotel
- AT&T
- YMCA/21C
- Millennium Hotel
- Civil Courts
- 1122 Locust Garage
- 1711 Locust and the Powerhouse
- 215 N 21st St
- NLEC (is it actually abandoned though?)
Ummmm maybe because most cities make their sky lounge to the public. Chicago and NYC do it all the time.
Exactly. Skyscrapers do this all the time. It’s a fair question to ask. Public doesn’t mean it has be free. People would pay to go up there and see the viewJJ Taino wrote:Ummmm maybe because most cities make their sky lounge to the public. Chicago and NYC do it all the time.
If it was sarcasm I didn’t catch it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And rooftop bars.


