So I happened to sit in on a very interesting conversation at a dinner earlier with some of my coworkers who brought the general talking point of " St Louis VS Missouri". I have always been so perplexed by the relationship between MO and STL. I know it all boils down to politics, but I really cannot find a similarity where a city wields so much political and economic power, yet is routinely targeted and harmed by its state government.
I believe we account for nearly half of the states GDP, and are still far and away the most populated region of the state. In Missouri, quite literally all roads lead to St. Louis,alll major cross-state Interstates pass through the area. All said, St. Louis is Missouri's most prominent and important city and that's not changing anytime soon.
One thing someone pointed out is how Governor Parson seems to be very invested in St. Louis and it's success. He's practically always here, is routinely meeting with companies and networking. I've seen this firsthand. Maybe a sign of hope for the future?
I guess my whole take on this, I would really like to see MO be more embracing of STL.
I believe we account for nearly half of the states GDP, and are still far and away the most populated region of the state. In Missouri, quite literally all roads lead to St. Louis,alll major cross-state Interstates pass through the area. All said, St. Louis is Missouri's most prominent and important city and that's not changing anytime soon.
One thing someone pointed out is how Governor Parson seems to be very invested in St. Louis and it's success. He's practically always here, is routinely meeting with companies and networking. I've seen this firsthand. Maybe a sign of hope for the future?
I guess my whole take on this, I would really like to see MO be more embracing of STL.



