Boeing has seen too many contract decisions being made for reasons other than cost and technical ability in the last 20 years or so. The services know that they need to pick a contractor who can keep a program sold to Congress. So all big contracts, such as fighter jets, go to big states -- either California, Texas, or Florida, no matter how badly the winner has performed in the past. Lockheed moved their World HQ to the DC area in 1994 after the Martin merger. In Washington, the executives can play golf with the decision makers, see them at church, etc. It is all about marketing.
Another disturbing trend is defense contracts going to nice weather areas. Government folks who fill out scorecards in their skill category that help decide winners, are later the same people who administer the contract over the next 10 years. It is pretty easy for them to shade their evaluations to favor places they would like to travel to over the next 10 years when the proposals are close. Nobody wants to travel to the Rust Belt in the winter. So the Midwest is the big loser for a lot of defense contracts nowadays.
So it makes some sense to move the Boeing Defense HQ to Washington. They can bid up housing there even more.
The move brings up the question -- do we really still need all government agencies to reside in Washingto DC in the digital age? I'd like to see the Post Dispatch pursue that question on their editorial page. Here is a nice piece from VOX suggesting we move some large government agencies to the Midwest. Then coastal folks can send their tax money to our cities and get little product in return, as we now do with Washington.
http://www.vox.com/new-money/2016/12/9/ ... to-midwest
Another disturbing trend is defense contracts going to nice weather areas. Government folks who fill out scorecards in their skill category that help decide winners, are later the same people who administer the contract over the next 10 years. It is pretty easy for them to shade their evaluations to favor places they would like to travel to over the next 10 years when the proposals are close. Nobody wants to travel to the Rust Belt in the winter. So the Midwest is the big loser for a lot of defense contracts nowadays.
So it makes some sense to move the Boeing Defense HQ to Washington. They can bid up housing there even more.
The move brings up the question -- do we really still need all government agencies to reside in Washingto DC in the digital age? I'd like to see the Post Dispatch pursue that question on their editorial page. Here is a nice piece from VOX suggesting we move some large government agencies to the Midwest. Then coastal folks can send their tax money to our cities and get little product in return, as we now do with Washington.
http://www.vox.com/new-money/2016/12/9/ ... to-midwest






