After reading that business journal article two things jump out at me:
First, if Express Scripts were to take the Gundeker offer, i think the property owner for St. Louis Center should back down and let the bridge be torn down. If he truly is intersted in helping the city, then even he must recognise the value in doing what it would take to make such a deal happen. If he balked, then he is clearly a sham.
Second, if Express Scripts does not take the Gundeker offer, then the Center owner should be given time to come up with a complementary plan for the property that could work in harmony with Dillard's building. This mean everything must be on the table. Taking the whole bridge out. Taking part of the bridge out. Maybe it should only be one level entering on the thrid floor of St. Louis Center? But all options should be looked at. The Center's owern is right, the brige is a help to the building. But the visual argument that it blocks washington and that the brige is way to low is also valid.
I say one bridge on the thrid level of the center going into the Dillard's building, if the Center's owner must really have a skyway and really thinks a resurant could be a good plan for such a space. I mean why not build the walkway on the thrid level, and then build his glassed in resurant above that. Then the view down washington would be more open. The sidewalks under along washington could be safer looking, and it could make for a very intersting space.
This is not all or nothing. Gotta think of all the options.
First, if Express Scripts were to take the Gundeker offer, i think the property owner for St. Louis Center should back down and let the bridge be torn down. If he truly is intersted in helping the city, then even he must recognise the value in doing what it would take to make such a deal happen. If he balked, then he is clearly a sham.
Second, if Express Scripts does not take the Gundeker offer, then the Center owner should be given time to come up with a complementary plan for the property that could work in harmony with Dillard's building. This mean everything must be on the table. Taking the whole bridge out. Taking part of the bridge out. Maybe it should only be one level entering on the thrid floor of St. Louis Center? But all options should be looked at. The Center's owern is right, the brige is a help to the building. But the visual argument that it blocks washington and that the brige is way to low is also valid.
I say one bridge on the thrid level of the center going into the Dillard's building, if the Center's owner must really have a skyway and really thinks a resurant could be a good plan for such a space. I mean why not build the walkway on the thrid level, and then build his glassed in resurant above that. Then the view down washington would be more open. The sidewalks under along washington could be safer looking, and it could make for a very intersting space.
This is not all or nothing. Gotta think of all the options.





