A wild idea, but very interesting imagining the possibilities... only in NY.
http://www.evolo.us/competition/new-york-horizon/
http://www.evolo.us/competition/new-york-horizon/

This idea is impossible. It isn’t a good idea to tear up Central Park. That’s a bad idea. That’s an immoral idea. Or it would be an immoral idea, if it were a serious proposal, but it is not. It is deeply unserious. But that isn’t the problem, really. The problem is Contestism.
I don't think that's what the Manhattan Project's goal was in the slightest. Quite the contrary, Oppenheimer & Fermi were helping to destroy ecology.CarexCurator wrote:Seems like a pretty terrible idea at odds with the Olmsted plan and the Mannahatta Project's efforts to restore ecological communities. I am sure it would also fill up with water and require a vast system of pumps completely unable to keep things from being soggy all the time.
Was that a joke?ricke002 wrote:I don't think that's what the Manhattan Project's goal was in the slightest. Quite the contrary, Oppenheimer & Fermi were helping to destroy ecology.CarexCurator wrote:Seems like a pretty terrible idea at odds with the Olmsted plan and the Mannahatta Project's efforts to restore ecological communities. I am sure it would also fill up with water and require a vast system of pumps completely unable to keep things from being soggy all the time.
Only sort of.CarexCurator wrote:Was that a joke?ricke002 wrote:I don't think that's what the Manhattan Project's goal was in the slightest. Quite the contrary, Oppenheimer & Fermi were helping to destroy ecology.CarexCurator wrote:Seems like a pretty terrible idea at odds with the Olmsted plan and the Mannahatta Project's efforts to restore ecological communities. I am sure it would also fill up with water and require a vast system of pumps completely unable to keep things from being soggy all the time.![]()
Start here: https://www.ted.com/talks/eric_sanderso ... anguage=en
I just don't think Curex was on board with my sarcasm/vained ignoraceframer wrote:You guys do realize that The Manhattan Project and The Mannahatta Project are two completely different things, right?
LOL!ricke002 wrote:I don't think that's what the Manhattan Project's goal was in the slightest. Quite the contrary, Oppenheimer & Fermi were helping to destroy ecology.CarexCurator wrote:Seems like a pretty terrible idea at odds with the Olmsted plan and the Mannahatta Project's efforts to restore ecological communities. I am sure it would also fill up with water and require a vast system of pumps completely unable to keep things from being soggy all the time.
