3,547
Life MemberLife Member
3,547

PostFeb 19, 2009#201

I would love to have small conventions throughout the year and a big one every month. It's good for retail and businesses downtown.

2,831
Life MemberLife Member
2,831

PostFeb 24, 2009#202

I like it.



I noticed the rendering is now in the windows of the building with "coming soon"

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostFeb 24, 2009#203

i wish they could AT LEAST somehow save the facade of the two smaller buildings on the corner, and incorporate them into the new structure, i suppose that would be a cost, etc. it's just sad to continue losing historic facades downtown. this corner was/is one of the few remaining downtown. overall, i'm very excited that this project is happening, next to the new farm and home, next to the updated 1015 Locust. lots happening within these three blocks. now, about that alverne and bridal store...

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostFeb 24, 2009#204

my 3 cents



1. sorry to see the small buildings go.

2. this looks bright, fresh and modern

3. i wish someone would do something bold in this town (aka Lumiere)



just a thought, criticize at will....




549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostFeb 24, 2009#205

Interesting idea, and certainly bold...I'm down with that.



I love the fact that the logo for this project is a nautilus shell, a symbol often used to represent the use of the "golden spiral" as a predominant proportioning system in Nature. (Anyone who has gone to my website can see that I'm a huge fan of this amazing proportioning system.) And while I love that spiral like it was my child, it seems too big in your image. Maybe half the size? And some differentiation of color would be nice. Maybe some ascent color to really make the logo pop. Or better yet leave the structural grid a different color instead of painting the entire facade white. And I could nit pick about the placement of it on the facade, seems like it wants to move up and to the right.



Regardless of these picky issues, I like the idea. No one seems to paint logos on the sides of buildings anymore, and those are often among the most interesting elements of historic structures.



You've inspired me... if I have time later today I might come up with my own, which will be similar to yours but with the minor changes I indicated.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostFeb 24, 2009#206

that's funny, I wanted it BIGGER! :lol:



I would also love a 'grid structure' or 'hanging garden' or 'projection screen' to hide the garage. I know OPO has this, but c'mon, you can never have enough 'Vegas.'

PostFeb 24, 2009#207

ok, actually, you can have too much 'Vegas.' Just look at Vegas.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 24, 2009#208

I like the view of the parking garage. The corner buildings needs to be taller - at least 4 stories, but ideally 6 or more. I know this would block some windows in the existing buidling . . . make a light well.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostFeb 24, 2009#209

shadrach wrote:my 3 cents



1. sorry to see the small buildings go.

2. this looks bright, fresh and modern

3. i wish someone would do something bold in this town (aka Lumiere)



just a thought, criticize at will....





Brilliant! I love it!

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostFeb 24, 2009#210

...if anyone from Killeen Studios is lurking around here, this is a freebie :wink:

169
Junior MemberJunior Member
169

PostFeb 24, 2009#211

already forwarded it to him...he's not a fan

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostFeb 24, 2009#212

:(

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostFeb 24, 2009#213

If they are going to use historic tax credits, that paint job would not be allowed.

729
Senior MemberSenior Member
729

PostFeb 25, 2009#214

First, I like the shell design on the building, definitely adds some edge to the streetscape. Second, anyone know the true timing on this project?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 25, 2009#215

MattnSTL wrote:If they are going to use historic tax credits, that paint job would not be allowed.


Really? If so I think that's a real shame. For many, "ghost signs" are sacred - well, there won't be ANY in 100 years because we no longer allow new signs!

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostFeb 25, 2009#216

Here are the variations I came up with, inspired by Shadrach. I'm assuming these paint jobs also would be prohibit receiving historic tax credits, but I had fun coming up with the proposals anyway.



The first image is based on a modification of Shadrach's image. The second one adds a vertical garden hung on a concrete grid, to (partially) block the parking garage from view and enhance the experience of the roof garden.












5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 25, 2009#217

Grover wrote:For many, "ghost signs" are sacred - well, there won't be ANY in 100 years because we no longer allow new signs!


Careful- some of us really like our ghost signs. :P



To me there's good reason to keep the ghost signage in place beyond the historic tax credits. As far as I know there's no other visible link to Scruggs Vandervoort & Barney, which was apparently considered by many to be St. Louis' leading department store over rivals Famous-Barr (Macy's), Stix Baer & Fuller (Dillard's), and similar but smaller retailers like Boyd's. Other Vandervoort's locations were altered, like the Crestwood location (now Macy's, soon to be vacant) and at Northwest Plaza. The Clayton location at Forsyth and Hanley, which was later home to Library Ltd. and then Borders before it relocated to Brentwood, was recently demolished for Centene's new development.



As much as I'd like to see the ghost signs stay, I must say that I really like the altered renderings some of you presented here. It reflects what I think is a delicate balance, i.e., should preserving history be the priority, or should it be creating something bolder for the future?



I'm usually torn between those two choices, so I guess that's why someone like me feels right at home in St. Louis. :wink:

181
Junior MemberJunior Member
181

PostFeb 25, 2009#218

I like the design of the shell for the building



If they dont choose to do the paint, maybe they can have some kind of



projection lighting to shine towards the building for the effect at night



that way they dont paint, but can still have the cool effect of lighting of the



building with the design from above

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 26, 2009#219

I love that "green wall" in your second rendering, Jeremy. Great idea!

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostFeb 26, 2009#220

citywatcher wrote:I like the design of the shell for the building



If they dont choose to do the paint, maybe they can have some kind of



projection lighting to shine towards the building for the effect at night



that way they dont paint, but can still have the cool effect of lighting of the



building with the design from above


I'm not sure that the patrons of the hotel would like a bright light shining directly into their windows...



-RBB

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 26, 2009#221

RBB wrote:I'm not sure that the patrons of the hotel would like a bright light shining directly into their windows.


True, but lighting on the western wall of the 917 building as it's been used on other historic downtown buildings like the Bankers Lofts, The Meridian, and the Renaissance Suites would still look nice IMHO.



I think the "green wall" to shield the parking garage is a great idea as well.

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostFeb 26, 2009#222

Every time I look at the rendering I did I like the logo on the wall less and less. I like the idea, but it's not working for my rendering. Here is a new one, simpler, cleaner, and focusing on celebrating the structural grid. The darker red portion attempts to be an expression of the front, visually bending around the corner to express the front facade on the side of the building. I think its nice and simple and does a decent job of representing the proportions of the building.






1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostFeb 27, 2009#223

ThreeOneFour wrote:
RBB wrote:I'm not sure that the patrons of the hotel would like a bright light shining directly into their windows.


True, but lighting on the western wall of the 917 building as it's been used on other historic downtown buildings like the Bankers Lofts, The Meridian, and the Renaissance Suites would still look nice IMHO.



I think the "green wall" to shield the parking garage is a great idea as well.


Agreed. That green wall looks fantastic.



-RBB

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostFeb 27, 2009#224

STL63101 wrote:already forwarded it to him...he's not a fan


BTW, thanks for doing that.



Throwing out ideas is one thing, but getting them in front of those that can do something about it, makes this forum awewsome!!



Someday, one of our ideas will be implemented....

Read more posts (-1 remaining)