Tapatalk

Lofts at The Highlands - 1031 Highlands Plaza Drive

Lofts at The Highlands - 1031 Highlands Plaza Drive

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostDec 27, 2004#1

-2 buildings

-5-stories each

-100-unit buildings

-The Highlands at Forest Park complex

-Occupancy Spring 2005





















Links:

Lofts at The Highlands

Hampton Inn to check in at The Highlands!

667
Senior MemberSenior Member
667

PostDec 28, 2004#2

I see it progressing well when I drive along 40, very cool cam. :)

6,660
AdministratorAdministrator
6,660

PostDec 28, 2004#3

Wish I would have known about that cam sooner.



I really like the design of this project. Very modern and urban, but still very St. Louis. If that makes sense.

2,813
Life MemberLife Member
2,813

PostDec 28, 2004#4

I like the design for this area of the city.



I really like the new Hampton Hotel going in...

very needed in this central cooridor.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostJan 19, 2005#5

Excuse me for saying: The Highlands resemble an isolated jumble of buildings as if like a suburban office park. This development doesn't connect to Dogtown! It's not urban in scale or feel. Even CityPlace in Creve Coeur is more urban and true to urban principles than the Highlands. Egregious! This is Dogtown's best slate for development in proximity to Forest Park, and the Highlands fails at connecting the two. I hope the residents and office workers are content for being denied interaction with the surrounding city frabric.

197
Junior MemberJunior Member
197

PostJan 19, 2005#6

yeah, the project looks more like an office park from what i saw of it (man, i hate to be Mr. Negative, lol, but what can i say?). It's like a private wharehouse complex the way it's arranged. The design of the buildings themselves isn't that bad, what's horrible and unforgivable is the layout :?

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostJan 19, 2005#7

I agree with the last couple posters...not too impressed with this very suburban office park-esque look. But hey, if people are willing to move into the City, and they like this location and style, why not?

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJan 19, 2005#8

SMSPlanstu wrote:Excuse me for saying: The Highlands resemble an isolated jumble of buildings as if like a suburban office park. This development doesn't connect to Dogtown! It's not urban in scale or feel. Even CityPlace in Creve Coeur is more urban and true to urban principles than the Highlands. Egregious! This is Dogtown's best slate for development in proximity to Forest Park, and the Highlands fails at connecting the two. I hope the residents and office workers are content for being denied interaction with the surrounding city frabric.


I would blame highway forty for that, and not the Highlands. It isn't optimal, but with Forest Park CC and the commercial Hampton ave. as its neighbors I don't think this area could have been done much better. The built out the site as best they could, I think.



It will tak major infrastructure projects to connect those neighborhoods to FP, so we'll hope that the new I-64 addresses this.

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostJan 19, 2005#9

Does anybody know what happened to the "bribe" money that the Art Museum gave to the Highlands project to be used for landscaping? If I remember correctly the Art Museum board was required to pay a fee several years ago so they could build the plaza on top of Art Hill. The thinking was that they were removing grass from the park and needed to be punished. This money was supposed to be used in the Highlands development to bring green space across highway 40. Some of the drawings showed a big fountain that could be seen from the highway.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJan 19, 2005#10

i think that those renderings take into account the new I64 project. It would be a horrible waste of money to produce something that elaborate and costly, only to have to rip it up to redo 40.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostJan 19, 2005#11

TheWayoftheArch wrote:i think that those renderings take into account the new I64 project. It would be a horrible waste of money to produce something that elaborate and costly, only to have to rip it up to redo 40.


What new I-64 project?

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

PostJan 19, 2005#12

Matt Drops The H wrote:What new I-64 project?


Really? Here is the website: http://www.thenewi64.org/

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostJan 19, 2005#13

Wow...where have I been? :oops:



Great...more lanes on "I-64"...



You know...there was a study that shows the more lanes per capita that a city has, the worse the sprawl. St. Louis was...#1 or 2...I can't remember.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJan 19, 2005#14

Good ol' STL, always at the top of those lists! :x

91
New MemberNew Member
91

PostJan 22, 2005#15

actually, #1 would go to our cross-state sister:

http://www.publicpurpose.com/hwy-tti99ratio.htm



Rank Urban Area Freeway Lane Miles per 1,000 Population Compared to Maximum Freeway Equivalent Lane Miles per 1,000 Populatoin Rank Compared to Maximum

1 Kansas City MO-KS 1.241 0.0% 1.530 1 0.0%

2 Fort Worth TX 0.894 -27.9% 1.371 2 -10.4%

3 Dallas TX 0.885 -28.7% 1.291 3 -15.6%

4 St. Louis MO-IL 0.883 -28.9% 1.286 4 -15.9%

5 San Antonio TX 0.867 -30.1% 1.135 6 -25.8%

6 Atlanta GA 0.799 -35.6% 1.085 10 -29.0%

7 Columbus OH 0.795 -35.9% 1.006 12 -34.2%

8 Houston TX 0.783 -36.9% 1.108 9 -27.5%

9 Cincinnati OH-KY 0.758 -38.9% 0.994 13 -35.0%

10 Indianapolis IN 0.714 -42.4% 1.130 8 -26.2%



Hmmm...

http://www.ti.org/vaupdate14.html

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostJan 23, 2005#16

It's not surprising that all rustbelt cities are on the list at the website! :?

But the other website belongs to the Thoreau website which if I may remind members is an anti-urban, pro-sprawl, and outdated American Dream of a monstrous McMansion with a wasted acre or more of nothing but grass opinionated website. In Chesterfield, Clarkson Valley, Wildwood and St. Charles County it's not hard to find these neighborhoods. In Bridgeton looking south from the Interstate 70 and St. Charles Rock Road one can see a neighborhood bordered by several acres of forest. The majority of that forest is from deep lots along Mark Twain Rd(the south outer road), but the cul-de-sac neighbohood behind those deep lots is buffered and is itself tree lined with the majority of trees reaching 70-110 feet tall. Neighborhoods anywhere should not be treeless even if they boast McMansions or else they're wasting the environment, and are less appealing or enjoying to live in. Even in suburban areas we need to maintain forests. I admire the city's many tree-lined streets and how the trees blend the neighborhoods, soften the feeling of entering a strange place, and bolster an attractive and desirable neighborhood to be lived in and not just toured. My favorite example is South Grand south of Chippewa St, or Euclid especially where Hortense, Lenox, and Pershing places abut Euclid under a tree canopy (ceiling) making it feel like a slice of the wealthy neighborhoods in London. I'm truely amazed and feel uplifted just be the street scene, that is what should be sought and replicated, a desirable street scene that is linked harmoniously by its trees, shrubs, flowers, and other plant life.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 24, 2005#17

I love the city's trees as well.



One nice city perk is that the city will plant a street tree (or trees) in front of your house, free of charge. All it takes is a call to the Forestry Department. I wish more people would take advantage of this service - I hate seeing blocks with few or no trees.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostJan 24, 2005#18

Southwest City has some gorgeous areas when it comes to greenery. The drive on Jamieson south of Chippewa, for example, is beautiful.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostMar 31, 2005#19

Developer to unveil premium lofts

Shawn Clubb

Of the Suburban Journals

Oakville-Mehlville Journal



Motorists passing along Highway 40 near Forest Park can't miss seeing the two large apartment complexes under construction just south of Oakland Avenue.



BalkeBrown and Associates, which completed work in 2001 on the Highlands Plaza One office complex, is nearing completion on the Lofts East and Lofts West on the same property. The 26-acre site was formerly the location of the St. Louis Arena.



The two buildings are expected to be completed late this spring with the first loft apartments being made available for lease in mid to late May. Exterior work, such as installing windows, and some finishing work remain.





Wendy Wakefield, who is responsible for management and leasing of the properties, said the lofts will be made available at a rate of 20 per week for ten weeks.



The complex will feature one-, two- and three-bedroom lofts. They will range in size from 863 square feet to 1,695 square feet.



Prices start at $1,075 and range to $2,000 per month.



BalkeBrown has set up a web site, http://www.highlandslofts.com, where people can obtain detailed information on the lofts, including a 360-degree tour of the lofts through renderings. Visitors can also use the site to print out any of the ten different floor plans and download a lease application.



Don Land, a principal with BalkeBrown, said the lofts each feature a bay window, granite countertops, carpeting and stainless steel appliances, among other premium features.



"These are probably the highest quality apartments I've seen anywhere in St. Louis," Land said.



The complex will feature a two-story fitness center with windows that look out on the plaza, Forest Park and downtown. Residents will also have access to a party room and free indoor parking.



Wakefield said BalkeBrown has not started its big push to advertise the properties for lease, but she is already getting ten calls per day. She can be reached by calling (314) 621-1414.



Land said BalkeBrown got into residential development only recently.



"We had a lot of interest from other developers at the Highlands site for residential development (about four years ago)," Land said, "so we started kicking around the idea of doing residential."



Land said the market for office space at that time was depressed and residential development at the Highlands sounded like an interesting concept. He said BalkeBrown initially planned to work jointly with Conrad Properties, but Conrad instead worked on Metro Lofts ? loft apartments in the Central West End at the former site of Boulevard Apartments.



At the same time that BalkeBrown began work on the Lofts, the company also began work on a 240-unit garden unit complex called Green Mount Lakes in O'Fallon, Ill. Those apartments are now 80-percent leased.



Land said the location of the Lofts is advantageous to residents because of the proximity to downtown, Forest Park and two major interstates. He said it is also a good fit for people working or going to school at Washington University.



The Lofts have been a $35.7 million project, while the five-story Highlands Plaza One cost $22 million to build.



BalkeBrown has formed a partnership to build a Hampton Inn & Suites and a Krieger's Pub and Grill on the east side of the property. That work is set to begin soon. About a third of the site remains undeveloped

20
New MemberNew Member
20

PostMar 31, 2005#20

I am sure they are nice, but I like to refer to these as "fake" lofts.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostMar 31, 2005#21

Look pretty tangible to me...

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

PostMar 31, 2005#22

gstone wrote:I am sure they are nice, but I like to refer to these as "fake" lofts.


Yeah, they are not lofts in the true sense of the word. From their website, they are marketing, "LOFT INSPIRED APARTMENT HOMES FOR RENT". :wink:

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostApr 19, 2005#23

April 17 2005




1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostDec 20, 2005#24

Construction is really moving along on the hotel and restaurant/pub/bar/grill.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostJan 11, 2006#25

I would consider moving there, but, I would choose a more downtown living location if I had 1500 a month for rent. It is nice looking from the highway, and I wonder how it really looks in person.

Read more posts (25 remaining)