Aldermanic President Lewis Reed is urging immediate preservation efforts at one of the historic Lemp Brewery buildings. Apparently, the condition of the building has gotten so bad, that some are seeing the next "Cupples-esque" demolition on the near horizon. Photos posted to Facebook show that the roof of the building is completely compromised, open to rain, snow, ice, etc.
These sorts of deteriorated building conditions don't happen overnight. They usually take years and years to get to the crisis point. And once at a crisis, the cost to save the building is so high, economics and public safety factors seal a bad ending. Witness: Cupples.
So where do we go from here? A local politician calling attention to a crisis is a start. But what's needed is millions of dollars in renovation to the building.
Unfortunately for the Cherokee area, this story does not portend for a good outcome. And as is so often the case, calling attention to a collapsing building at it's eleventh hour is usually not an effective historic preservation strategy.
The real question is why was this building allowed to decay for over a decade in its generally unmaintained condition? It's obviously in violation of the city's building code. I know that if I let the roof of my home end up like this, my neighbors and alderman would be all over me with code violations and I'd probably end up in housing court or being forced to sell the property.
But here again we see another case of apparent benign neglect of a historic city asset, with little if any action to prevent it. Sad.
These sorts of deteriorated building conditions don't happen overnight. They usually take years and years to get to the crisis point. And once at a crisis, the cost to save the building is so high, economics and public safety factors seal a bad ending. Witness: Cupples.
So where do we go from here? A local politician calling attention to a crisis is a start. But what's needed is millions of dollars in renovation to the building.
Unfortunately for the Cherokee area, this story does not portend for a good outcome. And as is so often the case, calling attention to a collapsing building at it's eleventh hour is usually not an effective historic preservation strategy.
The real question is why was this building allowed to decay for over a decade in its generally unmaintained condition? It's obviously in violation of the city's building code. I know that if I let the roof of my home end up like this, my neighbors and alderman would be all over me with code violations and I'd probably end up in housing court or being forced to sell the property.
But here again we see another case of apparent benign neglect of a historic city asset, with little if any action to prevent it. Sad.






