Tapatalk

How long before Loop connects with CWE?

How long before Loop connects with CWE?

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostJul 26, 2006#1

How long before Loop and CWE connect?

Total votes: 36
6(17%)
10(28%)
7(19%)
6(17%)
7(19%)

“I love what’s happening in St. Louis. There is so much redevelopment going on all over. The next four to five years will be the most exciting in the last hundred in terms of revitalization...There is so much new activity in The Loop right now. In the next 18 months, the Loop will take a leap to the next level.
--Joe Edwards



Given the Loop's push Eastward (and north with Wash U North Campus) and the CWE's rising property values, how long do you think it will take before the two are completely connected (no vacant or extremely "ghetto" gaps) along Delmar?



I said about ten years to some of my friends and they looked at me like I'm crazy, but I think this might be a conservative estimate because:



1. It is not like the entire stretch is wasteland. There are nice highrises, retail buildings and apartment buildings that are in decent shape along Delmar between Des Peres and Kingshighway (esp. around DeBaliverre and Belt, etc). Nice neighborhoods are directly south of these nodes and can support them so retail built here won't have to be supported by the western edge entirely.



2. Once the Loop is solidly connected to the Metrolink on the west (some could say it already is), land values of all property on the eastern stretch will rise dramatically. People will be more willing to ride to the Loop once the area around the station is more built up and thus safer. This will lead to more foot traffic to support more retail.



3. Joe Edwards thinks that the Trolley is only 3 years away from being a reality. Obviously this is going to spur some development and raise property values.



4. Joe Edwards has nearly finalized financing on the hotel he is building next to the Pageant. The Loop will become more of a tourist destination now that people from out of town can actually stay in a hotel on it. In the words of Edwards, "A hotel is really what The Loop needs to complete the whole experience and attract more tourism. People can fly to St. Louis, take the MetroLink to the Delmar Loop Station and walk west—it’s that easy. With 45 restaurants, retail shops, a movie theater, bowling alley and 10 live music venues, we have everything right here for a unique experience."



5. The Euclid Business node seems to be moving north, as well as the one on Taylor, towards Delmar. There are some tall buildings with retail in good shape on Euclid and Delmar already. Aren't the Roberts or someone proposing development at Delmar and Kingshighway?



Also isn't there talk about extending the limits of the CWE northwards or something along those lines that would allow for tax credits in rehabbing buildings in that northern area? That would go a long way towards making the area north of Delmar as an acceptable area to own a house. The housing stock is top notch and would be a bargain compared to the houses in the heart of the CWE.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJul 27, 2006#2

Don't forget about Washington University's push into the East Loop area, creating a north campus. I'm not sure how serious they are, i.e. is it going to be an actual extension of their campus, or something like their west "campus"? I can see positive and negative aspects to them moving into that area in a big way, but I think overall it would be more positive than negative and could provide a big push eastward.



I think much of Delmar will be built out in ten years, but there will still be gaps, so I say 15 years.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 27, 2006#3

I say less than ten years. Closer to five. But I expect most of the new development to be lower density, one or two stories. And some of those wide-open lots closer to Kingshighway may get proposals for mini strip-malls, with parking in front. In other words, look for some "suburban thinking" developers to see the potential of this area. Keep your guard up, everyone!

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJul 27, 2006#4

Without specific development like a streetcar or an ambitious developer taking on a section in the middle (like the area around the old St. Luke's), it will take well more than 10 years for the areas to connect. Why? While Joe Edwards is pushing hard to move east and connect the Loop with the Delmar Metrolink stop, the CWE is not making a similar push north. If anything, the CWE is moving east (Gaslight Square, Cortex). And while Edwards can push the commerical strip for the Loop further east, at a certian point, the commerical must become a new node with housing and a different center, and my guess is that center would be approximatly where the old St. Luke's sits.



(roll that idea in your head for a minute, what if St. Lukes had never left... sigh... ok back to reality).



And remember, while the CWE is a great neighborhood, what is the ultimate driver of its growth? My guess is Wash U and Barnes. There is no similar weight node pushing growth between the Loop and the CWE. Without such a draw, the CWE has little reason to expand north, but great reason to expand south and east with all thats happening with Cortex and with Forest Park Southeast.



so where does this lave the CWE and Loop. Both are great neighborhoods and the respective development for each are only strengthening both, but without a concerted effort to either develope a streetbased transit link with stops that will help define new nodes for growth or a developer steping up and taking an 3-4 block area around delmar and creating a node, I just don't think the momentum will push the two together anytime soon.

1,355
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,355

PostJul 27, 2006#5

I went with 5 but only if we can stem the rising tide of poverty.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostJul 27, 2006#6

Joe's trolley will only go as far west as DeBaliviere, not Euclid. As a result, I think it's a missed opportunity to link the Loop and CWE. Meanwhile to the east of the CWE, there is talk of a trolley linking Downtown with Grand Center via the Loft District, likewise falling short of the CWE.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJul 27, 2006#7

It's tough too, just because of the nature of Delmar. Heading east, commercial development basically stops at the DeBaliviere Metro garage and the street becomes almost entirely residential until you get to Union. The area between Union and Kingshighway offers huge redevelopment potential as there are numerous large vacant lots - it would be a great area for mixed-use buildings like the one going in on the site of the old taxi station near The Pageant. But still, it would be separate from The Loop because of the residential area between DeBaliviere and Union.



East of Kingshighway, the street takes on a different feel. There are vacant lots and some commercial buildings as well as a big newer church that doesn't really fit in with its surroundings. The street also bends before you get to Taylor, which gives it kind of a weird feel.



Then, east of Taylor, it seems to go back to being residential.



I'm surprised that with all the plans that have been commissioned over the years, there's never been a comprehensive redevelopment plan for Delmar, say from Union to Vandeventer.

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostJul 28, 2006#8

I went with 10 years. Although, I'm not completely clear on the question. What does it mean to connect The Loop with the CWE. Do you mean business districts connecting? Because they're pretty closely connected right now, based upon a linking of neighborhoods. DeBaliviere (the street not the moderator) is considered the beginning of the CWE by a lot of people. I think the Loop could make it to DeB in 5 years or a little more, especially when the trolley gets put in. Once the Loop makes it there, then the push from the CWE will probably start.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 29, 2006#9

Those are some very good points, JMed. I think you might be a bit more realistic than I am.

752
Super MemberSuper Member
752

PostJul 29, 2006#10

I said 20+ years becuase of all the momentum that is going to only pickup downtown, it will hamper developments else where I am afraid. BV, TBD, Casino, CL etc. These are all big deveopmetns that if all of them are going to go thru, the entire metro area needs to be behind them. And part of me doesn't want them to combine, they are both urban and they are both fun, but they have such differnet feels, if they were to combine, it may neutralize the feelings of each one...

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostJul 29, 2006#11

tbspqr wrote:I said 20+ years becuase of all the momentum that is going to only pickup downtown, it will hamper developments else where I am afraid. BV, TBD, Casino, CL etc. These are all big deveopmetns that if all of them are going to go thru, the entire metro area needs to be behind them. And part of me doesn't want them to combine, they are both urban and they are both fun, but they have such differnet feels, if they were to combine, it may neutralize the feelings of each one...


I disagree. Development in the city is not a zero-sum game. A lot of people on this forum seem to believe that demand for city living is fixed. That there are only a certain amount of people and once they all move in, no more development can take place. This is evident in the threads about the Bottle District, Ballpark Village, and Chouteau's Landing. "Can we support all of this development? Who are going to buy all of those condos?" etc. The reality is that as downtown is renovated and becomes nicer, more people will want to live there.



Demand for living in a downtown with abandoned bombed-out buildings, empty cracked sidewalks, and no retail is much lower than demand for a renovated, rejuvenated and safe city center. The Bottle District, Ballpark Village, Chouteau's Landing will all compliment each other rather than compete for survival just the same as Washington Avenue and Old Post Office Square's revival have supported each other. With all of these developments coming online and the lake connecting downtown to the historic southside, I believe we have only begun to see a trickle of demand for city living...



This applies citywide as well. What is good for downtown is good for midtown and the CWE and the Loop. It will change people's perceptions of the city for the better.





That is why I like the possibility of two of the city's most visible and interesting neighborhoods connecting. It will alter the perception of the city as a bunch of islands of cool neighborhoods in a sea of vacant lots and abandoned buildings. The larger these islands grow and connect the better. That is why it is important for downtown to connect to grand center, Soulard to connect to LS and BPW, Chouteaus lake and landing to connect downtown to the southside, midtown to the CWE, CWE to the Loop and hopefully Bottle District to Old North St. Louis.

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostJul 29, 2006#12

Thanks Bastiat. I agree with you 100% I don't agree with people that think there is a limit. Anything can happen. Not many years ago, who would have predicted that Downtown would become one of the most popular neighborhoods in the Metro area? I believe there has been a sea change in St. Louis. In fact, there is a sea change nationwide.



And the idea of joining and blending popular neighborhoods is extremely important. I see a day when you will go from the Arch to the Clayton and see nothing but vibrant, prosperous neighborhoods. No gaps. And perhaps go from the Arch to Bevo Mill with no gaps. And who knows, maybe from the Arch to Pasadena Hills.



If everything comes together, the Loop & CWE could join in 5 years. But, there isn't anyway of knowing. But, doing so would heal a wound in this city. And with that wound healed, the skys the limit. It should be a priority.

696
Senior MemberSenior Member
696

PostJul 30, 2006#13

^ ^^ Great points, guys. I can only add that to question if demand in city living has possibly been met it is awfully short sighted speculation in these times.

Now, more than ever in the last 50 years, people are wanting to return to the city. Many who live out in the burbs will change their minds about living there. And even if not many here do, how about their children or those moving to St. Louis?

Big old cities of the past are not the places they were decades ago. Gone are the fowl odors of air poluting factories, much dangerous emissions from fossil fuel burning transportation (not to mention the price of such) and what remains are the solid, well built architecturally pleasing structures that can't be reproduced today. The fact that people are rediscovering the need to live in communities that are not autonomous and polarized merits mention. And the forced auto-dependencey suburban life of driving everywhere is a big pain in the katukus. America's love affair with the automobile is possibly (hopefully) waning, exascerbated by lack-luster design and expensive insurance, fuel, etc, etc, etc.

I believe the old way cities used to function are returning, with everything centrally located, and the need of a living on a half acres of land in cookie cutter suburban communites may become a thing of the past for the most part. Really, how long can suburban sprawl continue to grow? When I was a kid 25 miles out from downtown St. Louis, you were out in the "sticks". Today you can go 50, 60 miles out from downtown St. Louis and you're still in its suburban environs. How much longer can this kind of sprawl go on? I think people are beginning to "get it".

Taking these facts into consideration, how can the Loop NOT be joined in the near future? Only through ignorance will it not, would be my answer. Timeline? It all depends on developers and when civic leaders realize what the wave of the future seems to be at this time.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 30, 2006#14

I think Delmar will continue to fill-in simply because it's the only street with commercial potential between UCity and the CWE. Neither Lindell nor Forest Park Parkway are available for development. And Page is too far North. There's really no option other than Delmar. As the CWE and UCity continue to grow, Delmar will inevitably become more and more important as a connector.

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostJul 30, 2006#15

I think we will see some more renovation in the houses that are within walking distance of Delmar, and especially the station. These are built of quality construction. For things to really take off, they will need to be listed as historic neighborhoods. Wasn't there talk of extending the CWE Historic District north? The biggest obstacle is all of the suburban crap housing being built on a lot of the blocks to the northeast.



There is already work going forward on the eastern parts of Delmar, not just stuff by the Pageant. There are some newly constructed townhomes near Kingshighway (not that I like the design) and it seems that a lot of storefronts are renovated near DeBaliviere.

710
Senior MemberSenior Member
710

PostDec 29, 2006#16

Framer wrote:I think Delmar will continue to fill-in simply because it's the only street with commercial potential between UCity and the CWE. Neither Lindell nor Forest Park Parkway are available for development. And Page is too far North. There's really no option other than Delmar. As the CWE and UCity continue to grow, Delmar will inevitably become more and more important as a connector.


pershing feels like it is not reaching its potential commercially...

85
New MemberNew Member
85

PostDec 31, 2006#17

I frequent this stretch a lot - both on foot and on my bike. I'm not feeling very optimistic. The businesses in the east loop are all struggling. The Loop Center seems to be stalled (Companion is apparently NOT moving in after all). The African-American history museum is probably years away. Joe Edwards doesn't seem to be doing anything with the Delmar Station or the big ex-school property farther east. Lots of little businesses along Delmar have come and gone like trampled wild flowers.



What gives?



If the city really wants to see the Loop extended eastward, then they need to a) fix the sidewalks on Delmar just west of Skinker, b) get SBC to trim their trees and shovel their walks (why do they shovel the parking lot and not the sidewalks) or better yet leave or better yet sell off the two vast parking lots on either side of their building, c) do something about the abandoned gas station next to 609 that's been the great Delmar welcome sign to the city for X number of years, d) fix up the crossing at Delmar and Skinker.....



And that's just to get some daytime life in the so-called "East Loop." When you get east of Des Peres, you've go the problem of the decrepit bridge that is supposed to be replaced (but when?!), the hideous BerlinWall existing along the Metro Bus depot for two long blocks, and then the various locked gates east of there that cut wealthy communities off from Delmar....



And then you've got the psychiatric institute near Union with its reputation (deserved or otherwise) for housing dangerous criminals.....



And we're still a long long way from Euclid. I think it would take 20 years of progress to reknit this particular part of the urban fabric. But I hope I'm wrong.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 22, 2016#18

10 years wasn't enough