2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostAug 03, 2005#16

I just got a chance to thumb through a copy of the book at work. It is amazing how much has changed in the last 45 years. The part that saddens me most is looking at Jefferson Avenue (Market to the north anyway) before it was widened. There were so many buildings along it, not anymore. The other part that saddened me was seeing how Chouteau looked(just west of downtown) in the not so recent past. :cry:



It must have been something to live back then before TVs and internet boards :wink:



Another item of note was that in July 1953 most of the streets downtown became one-way.

2,076
Life MemberLife Member
2,076

PostAug 03, 2005#17

I have the book as well, and it is fascinating. What also surprises me, and gives me some hope, is how ugly parts of the city -- including downtown -- looked in the mid 1960s. The influx of surface parking is, in my estimation, the primary reason. Some areas have actually improved since 40 years ago.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 07, 2005#18

Wow, I just saw all these pictures for the first time. THANKS!



It really jarred me when I would see an intersection I'm familiar with today, and realized the main differance between then and now is the MISSING BUILDINGS! Especially on the corners. What a damn shame we lost so many of those! Thank god we still have so many left, though.



I'm gonna have to run out and get this book.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostAug 18, 2005#19

I've seen that book ... but personally I find the pictures almost too painfull to look at. Everytime I see them I'm just stunned at how much urbanity was lost. I just don't understand how our parenst generation could let all of that just crumble away. Didn't anybody gove a damn about their city? How could any city let gaslight square be demolished? What in god's name were they thikning when they took out the street car lines? I'm just dumb founded. Those pics show exactly the kind of enviroment that cities are crawling over themselves to develope today. Sadly I doubt we'll ever come close to equalling what we once had. ... makes me want cry.

2,434
Life MemberLife Member
2,434

PostAug 19, 2005#20

I thought this was interesting...



MetroLink line compared to the Hodiamont streetcar line:







http://www.apta.com/research/info/onlin ... h2new3.cfm





Here is a map of the East St. Louis streetcar network at its peak:







http://hometown.aol.com/chirailfan/eslmapt.html





And finally, here's a map of the entire St. Louis streetcar system in 1920!







You can order it on EBay!!! Just type in "St. Louis streetcar" and you'll find it! What a treasure!

696
Senior MemberSenior Member
696

PostAug 20, 2005#21

There was a streetcar that travelled between Sprinfield, Il and downtown StL. I believe it was taken out in the late fifties or early sixties, but I remember seeing it. It was blue with a silver roof and ran along the main RR tracks (in Illinois) that run up to Chicago and Detroit. Not a comuter train, but a regular electric streetcar.

3
New MemberNew Member
3

PostJan 09, 2006#22

Wish one day the streecars come roling down grand ave again,maybe futuristic cars in the newly created entertainment district at Grand centre.I think its agreat idea.Would attract younger people to move in the area.

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostJan 09, 2006#23

It'd be nice, but that's a long ways off. Personally, I'd ride the MetroLink more often if there was street car service down Grand.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostOct 05, 2006#24









I wonder where the first two where taken.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 05, 2006#25

SWEET. I say scrap the ubber-retro/classic/wooden streetcars of Joe Edwards and bring back the Art Deco dreams!

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

PostOct 05, 2006#26

Well, in the first pic, there's a "Grand-Franklin Drug" store. So I'd say it's a safe bet that that picture is of the N Grand and MLK intersection.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostOct 05, 2006#27

steve wrote:Well, in the first pic, there's a "Grand-Franklin Drug" store. So I'd say it's a safe bet that that picture is of the N Grand and MLK intersection.
I just looked at an aerial photo and the Intersection of North Grand and Franklin (the portion of Franklin that was renamed is east of Leftingwell) still exists,

but everything in that photo has been replaced by parking lots and housing projects. :twisted:

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

PostOct 05, 2006#28

Hmm, my bad.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostOct 06, 2006#29

buhgmlubbuh::



sorry, I just threw up a bit in my mouth after seeing these and realizing how moronic city leaders were to get rid of these things. All in favor of overthrowing the city government and bringing back the gulfstream streetcars!? :D

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 06, 2006#30

TO THE BARRICADES . . . er, the STREETCARS!!!



Acutally, does anyone know how much of the system is intact? Busdad maybe? I've heard that many, if not most, of the tracks still exist and have just been paved over. Seriously though about the streetcars (does Joe Edwards check this site), don't go with 1920's - the 1960's+ cars were bigger and very cool.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostOct 06, 2006#31

Are we missing a unique style of architecture?



In the first photo the three story row houses look like a style that no longer exists in St. Louis. Are they a variation of urban Queen Anne?



I love the commercial buildings in the first photo with all the limestone and the shields and bird like statues.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 06, 2006#32

This is one of the best threads ever! Great job, citylover.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostOct 09, 2006#33

Great thread. Christmas shopping for my parents just got a whole lot easier this year.



If someone already mentioned this, sorry, but that vertical "ST LOUIS" sign on Grand from picture 1 needs to be either restored or duplicated. That is a great piece and would make a great statement somewhere in the city.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostOct 10, 2006#34

In the first photo the three story row houses look like a style that no longer exists in St. Louis. Are they a variation of urban Queen Anne?



I also noticed those row houses. I haven't seen anything like them anywhere in the city. Where was this again?

PostOct 10, 2006#35

wow. just maps.googled it. how sad. this area lost so much housing stock, not only the Vandventer Place neighborhood but from what's in the photo too. We were such an urban city, easily rivaling Chicago at the time, at least on a somewhat smaller scale. It's so sad how much we lost, but then again, tons still exist.

5
New MemberNew Member
5

PostOct 10, 2006#36

Acutally, does anyone know how much of the system is intact? Busdad maybe? I've heard that many, if not most, of the tracks still exist and have just been paved over.


I did see a rail peaking out through a pothole on Pershing near DeBaliviere a few months ago.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 10, 2006#37

I've seen them on Olive near the Superman Building - I wonder if the rails were removed when Gaslight Square was built.

8,922
Life MemberLife Member
8,922

PostOct 10, 2006#38

PullyMan wrote:
Acutally, does anyone know how much of the system is intact? Busdad maybe? I've heard that many, if not most, of the tracks still exist and have just been paved over.


I did see a rail peaking out through a pothole on Pershing near DeBaliviere a few months ago.


Even if the entire system was still intact, but covered... could they be economically unearthed and made functional?

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostOct 10, 2006#39

Citylover, what a fantastic thread!



I purchased this tome when it was first released (and it wasn't cheap for a paperback!). It's worth every penny though. :wink:



It alternately excites me, and depresses me, when I look at these pictures...



I'm excited by how much of our built environment and infrastructure remains, along with the possibility of attracting quality infill and perhaps reclaiming at least some of the original streetcar routes. (Trent, I agree that Grand would be a great place to start given the steady and significant volume of riders, and I would get a lot more use out of Metrolink if a streetcar line was available there).



I get rather depressed, though, when I see the pictures (especially of North Saint Louis and Midtown) where wanton and wholesale demolition has erased most if not all traces of our city's past. Even though the potential for interesting infill exists, unfortunately our city's leaders are often unwilling to accept denser, more modern development. Instead, we wind up with poorly-integrated developments that are usually insulting and cheap imitations of the past. Hopefully, given time and continued investment in the city, we can preserve more of our built environment and demand better quality with new construction.



BTW, if I had the $$$$$ to buy a block or two of city buildings, here's where I'd like to start. This stretch is amazingly intact, and Saint Anthony of Padua Catholic Church makes for a great neighborhood anchor IMHO.







I wouldn't mind having at least one of those 1950s cars in the picture either! :wink:

3,445
Life MemberLife Member
3,445

PostOct 13, 2006#40

I found this site with old pictures of St. Louis streetcars. I did a search of our board and didn't get a hit, so I thought i'd post the link.



http://davesrailpix.com/stl/stl.htm




Read more posts (25 remaining)