Hotel developer seeks reprieve from building houses
Shawn Clubb
Of the Suburban Journals
Southwest City Journal
11/16/2005
Developer Charles Drury has offered to give back part of a 20-year tax abatement for the proposed Drury Inn site off Hampton Avenue in exchange for being let out of a part of his original deal with the city.
Jim Shrewsbury, president of the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, has introduced a bill that would have Drury get 10 years of full tax abatement and five years of half tax abatement on the hotel. For giving up part of the abatement, Drury would not have to replace ten houses that had to be removed to make room for the hotel.
However, Tom Bauer, the former alderman for the 24th ward who is running in a special election for the board seat after being recalled, said he would not have backed the original project had the ten new homes not been part of it.
"I didn't want to lose ten homes in the 24th ward without seeing them replaced somewhere else in the ward," Bauer said. "We couldn't afford to lose population. There's a huge benefit to the community when you see new homes built of quality materials and new residents."
Without the homes, Bauer said, Drury shouldn't get any tax abatement.
Shrewsbury said it makes no sense economically for Drury to build the homes. He said Bauer's requirement that the homes be built was not practical.
Read More
Shawn Clubb
Of the Suburban Journals
Southwest City Journal
11/16/2005
Developer Charles Drury has offered to give back part of a 20-year tax abatement for the proposed Drury Inn site off Hampton Avenue in exchange for being let out of a part of his original deal with the city.
Jim Shrewsbury, president of the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, has introduced a bill that would have Drury get 10 years of full tax abatement and five years of half tax abatement on the hotel. For giving up part of the abatement, Drury would not have to replace ten houses that had to be removed to make room for the hotel.
However, Tom Bauer, the former alderman for the 24th ward who is running in a special election for the board seat after being recalled, said he would not have backed the original project had the ten new homes not been part of it.
"I didn't want to lose ten homes in the 24th ward without seeing them replaced somewhere else in the ward," Bauer said. "We couldn't afford to lose population. There's a huge benefit to the community when you see new homes built of quality materials and new residents."
Without the homes, Bauer said, Drury shouldn't get any tax abatement.
Shrewsbury said it makes no sense economically for Drury to build the homes. He said Bauer's requirement that the homes be built was not practical.
Read More











