Domestic Migration 1992-2011

9,762
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 05, 2014#1

East West Gateway does Maps of the Month and here is the Map for September. very interesting, I was a bit surprised that more people from LA moved here then vice versa


PDF for a larger view.
http://www.ewgateway.org/pdffiles/mapli ... n-2014.pdf

8,155
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 05, 2014#2

^ Pretty cool map, but I wish we had say a 2001-2011 map as well to compare more recent trends... it also would be good to know about reasons for outmigration to the south -- mostly retirement? work? decent mix? And also how much of the inflow from out-state Illinois settled in Missouri or just came to Metro East.... Madison Co. has had decent growth during this time period; St. Clair Co. had pretty good population increase in the 90s before dropping in the naughts.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off

PostSep 05, 2014#3

^The move south has been a long standing trend. I am amazed there is positive migration from SoCal. Am happy to see it was net positive from Chicago and Upstate New York which shows STL as generally leading among Rust Belt cities. KC is eating our lunch though for some reason...

9,762
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 05, 2014#4

haven't had much time to dive into it but from a first look i would say that the migration from iowa/michigan area has a lot to do with Bosnians that have come to the US in the 90s and then moved to St.Louis once we got established as a major Bosnian city.
(Iowa/Michigan/Chicagoland area also had large Bosnian populations)

PostSep 05, 2014#5

roger wyoming II wrote:^ Pretty cool map, but I wish we had say a 2001-2011 map as well to compare more recent trends... it also would be good to know about reasons for outmigration to the south -- mostly retirement? work? decent mix? And also how much of the inflow from out-state Illinois settled in Missouri or just came to Metro East.... Madison Co. has had decent growth during this time period; St. Clair Co. had pretty good population increase in the 90s before dropping in the naughts.
Ill ask my contact at EWG if they have a 2000 and on map.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off

PostSep 05, 2014#6

^ seems doubtful that could explain all of it. I am sure a lot of the Michigan moves are related to the fall of Detroit and contraction in the auto industry.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 05, 2014#7

STLEnginerd wrote: I am amazed there is positive migration from SoCal...
LA (and NYC) has had significant overall domestic out-migration and with its huge population it makes sense that we'd benefit.

PostSep 05, 2014#8

roger wyoming II wrote: also how much of the inflow from out-state Illinois settled in Missouri or just came to Metro East.... Madison Co. has had decent growth during this time period; St. Clair Co. had pretty good population increase in the 90s before dropping in the naughts.
upon further review, St. Clair gained population in the naughts (and had dropped in prior decades) and since 2010 the census estimates a return to decline in St. Clair. Anyway, I suspect that the large majority of the inflow from out-state Illinois went into Metro East rather than crossing over into the Missouri side.

9,762
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 08, 2014#9

Here the source of the data, it has county to county inflow and outlow from 2004-2005 to 2010-2011
http://www.irs.gov/uac/SOI-Tax-Stats-Co ... Data-Files





4,553
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 08, 2014#10

Farmington went from being the second largest "outflow" destination to being included in the MSA. Definitely helps improve the stats.

Also, I suppose a lot of it has to do with demographics (aging baby boomers) but the migration to Florida is getting out of hand.

8,948
Life MemberLife Member

PostSep 08, 2014#11

and Texas.

190
Junior MemberJunior Member

PostSep 09, 2014#12

St. Louis should be doing everything it can to move some satellite campuses of Illinois, Arkansas and Oklahoma universities within (if possible) and/or near the City limits. This would capitalize on the preexisting migration trends and possibly capture new residents.

3,808
Life MemberLife Member

Post1:09 PM - Today#13

Saw this 2024 graphic on SSP. Where in MO did all these gen-Z-ers land? Not St. Louis, apparently... KC? Where else in MO would they want to live?

Charleston's popularity is baffling to me. Their downtown is pretty nice but the rest is just suburb. I guess it's jobs.


36
New MemberNew Member

Post1:23 PM - Today#14

In and around Springfield is likely a big part. 

12K
Life MemberLife Member

Post4:33 PM - Today#15

^That's what I was thinking. Maybe a mini-Nashville effect. 

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off

Post4:57 PM - Today#16

The growth is the result of the magnetic draw of Brentwood Forest.