Tapatalk

Council Tower in Midtown - Problems

Council Tower in Midtown - Problems

2,820
Life MemberLife Member
2,820

PostAug 15, 2007#1

I knew this was coming! I hope to see this tower redone soon!



Blame piles up with rubble at run-down apartments

By Jake Wagman

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

08/14/2007







ST. LOUIS — Broken windows and a rusted canopy greet visitors to the Council Tower Apartments in midtown.



But the deteriorating conditions don't stop there.



City inspectors condemned part of the building earlier this summer after pieces of the facade began to break away, leaving a pile of rubble that blocks a basement exit. City officials fear that the bricks could continue to fall, possibly even on the highway below.



The Grand Boulevard building also has been cited for excess trash, leaky plumbing and roach infestation. State elevator inspectors have identified numerous violations over the past several years, noting that often only one elevator is available to service the tower's 27 floors. Advertisement



Many of the tower's residents are elderly, disabled or both. Even if they could afford to leave, for many, it would not be easy.



"We have tried so hard to get somebody to just listen to us plead our case," said resident Darlene Way, 58, who suffers from degenerative arthritis.



The trouble at Council Tower comes at a time when the city is facing problems at two other apartment complexes that also serve low-income or elderly residents.



Council Tower was built in 1969 by the Teamsters union, which owned the building until it was acquired by a prominent real estate family, the Sansones, 10 years later.



The building is run by the Sansone Group's property management division and owned by a nonprofit corporation, the Council Tower Association, whose officers, according to the most recent report available from the state, list Sansone's Clayton headquarters as their address.



Sansone officials refused repeated requests for an interview. They say they are pursuing a claim with their insurance company to fix the most pressing problem at the tower: the dozens of bricks that have fallen off the east wall.



Sansone also says it has applied for emergency repair funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which subsidizes rent at the tower. Meanwhile, the city is concerned that the crumbling facade — visible from westbound Highway 40 (Interstate 64) — presents an increasingly dangerous scenario for motorists.



In a recent e-mail to a HUD official, Deputy Mayor Barbara Geisman wrote that the situation has been a problem for more than a year. The tower's owners, Geisman wrote, "have told our Public Safety Department that they do not intend to do anything about it until their insurance company pays the claim."



"This situation has reached a new level of severity," Geisman wrote. "When the bricks started falling last year, they fell from the lower part of the wall — now they are falling from the upper part of the wall on this tall building, and in the Public Safety Department's opinion there is a danger of them falling onto I-64."



Council Tower representatives must appear in city housing court on Wednesday to address the falling bricks and other code infractions.



City officials want the problems fixed without shutting down the building — a step that would require relocating the tower's elderly and disabled residents. That's not something that tenants, many who need help moving around, want to do.



"They want to die here," said resident David Clinton, 61, who walks with a cane and is blind in one eye.



Local HUD officials are watching closely. The agency has a contract with Council Tower worth about $719,000 a year. If the building is completely condemned, one option HUD would have is to stop payment.



For now, residents are organizing, reviving the building's tenant organization to address their concerns. One key issue is elevator service, which they say is spotty, at best.



"It's a crap shoot to even get out of here," said tenant Carol Newman, 66, a former nurse who now uses a wheelchair.



Newman lives on the sixth floor, though that's not always where she ends up.



"The elevators are so funny," she said. "No matter what floor you push, they will take you anywhere."



Of the building's three elevators, only two are operational, and one of those is frequently occupied by maintenance workers, noted the Missouri fire marshal's office after a June visit.



On July 19, Sansone distributed a memo to tenants promising improvements that will make long waits for the elevator "a thing of the past."



"When the total modernization of the elevator system is completed," the memo said, "the modernized controls and speeds of the new system will make it seem like we have six elevators instead of three!"



The elevator issues at Council Tower are similar, though not as severe, as the problems at Plaza Square near downtown. State inspectors last week were in the process of shutting down most if not all of the elevators at the apartment complex. While HUD is not involved with Plaza Square, the department recently cut off its support to another downtown building, Centenary Towers, which was declared a "public safety nuisance" because of chronic crime and vandalism.



James Heard, director of HUD's St. Louis office, said the problems at Centenary Towers and Council Tower are part of a larger concern: A building supply that is not up to the task of supplying affordable housing to a growing elderly population.



"Aging housing stock is an issue," Heard said. "When we start looking at the stock here in St. Louis and across the country, there are some problems."



For Council Tower residents, the concerns are more immediate. In June, city health inspectors wrote that residents at 15 apartments had complained of roaches. One tenant complained of gnats, while another voiced concerns about rodents.



Far more worrisome for tenants, though, is what happens if there is a fire — which has happened before at Council Tower. In October 1998, a blaze gutted a 21st floor apartment at the tower. About 150 firefighters responded to the fire, in which 160 elderly residents were evacuated. One firefighter was hospitalized, but no residents were hurt.



Even so, residents fear that the unreliable elevators could lead to a catastrophe.



It would be a "crypt," Newman said.



At their appearance in housing court this week, a city judge could fine Council Tower's owner thousands of dollars — up to $500 for each of about 15 violations, according to the city counselor's office.



Way said that she and other tenants are trying to arrange transportation to be at the court hearing.



"What we are going to say is 'Help us save our home,'" Way said. "We don't want to move, but we don't like where we are living."



jwagman@post-dispatch.com | 314-622-3580

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostAug 15, 2007#2

Fix this great building! It's a gem from the age of urban renewal, and it deserves to be renewed. The residents certainly deserve it too.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostAug 15, 2007#3

The Sansones have all that money, but just ride this building to ruin while taking almost 3/4 of a mil from HUD.



Thats not what I think about doing when I dreamt I won the Lottery...

385
Full MemberFull Member
385

PostAug 15, 2007#4

I hope they restore the brick facade with its original brick mural. I loved seeing that design from the highway and was devistated to see it just crumble away. It would be a loss to STL to loose such a unique piece of artwork at such a prominent location.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostAug 16, 2007#5

those buildings are SO prime to be remodeled and turned into housing/apts for SLU students. I've always liked both towers. So, 1960's urban renewal, and cool. obviously, lots of bad decisions were made during this period, but these buildings are architecturally significant.

835
Super MemberSuper Member
835

PostAug 16, 2007#6

These old-school towers are among my favorite in the city. They scream JIVE to me!

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 17, 2007#7

I love the tall, slender profile of this tower as seen heading west on 40/64. Of course, I liked it better before the thing started falling apart. If Sansone's name gets dragged around in the mud enough, maybe then they'll do something about it.



A friend of mine lived on one of the upper floors until just a few months ago. He happens to be confined to a wheelchair. I'm sure glad he got out of there before anything serious happened.

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostAug 17, 2007#8

Glad to see others like this building, too. It is a landmark and represents an era in big cities.

2,820
Life MemberLife Member
2,820

PostAug 23, 2007#9

I LOVE THIS TOWER ON THE MIDTOWN SKYLINE!!! 8)


























12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 23, 2007#10

Yes! Nice shots. I love seeing buildings in their context.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostAug 23, 2007#11

Framer wrote:I love the tall, slender profile of this tower as seen heading west on 40/64. Of course, I liked it better before the thing started falling apart. If Sansone's name gets dragged around in the mud enough, maybe then they'll do something about it.


I hope so, because I believe these buildings are worth saving. Judging by pics I've seen in the Ladue News and the glossy city magazines, at least some of the Sansones know how to party at their Town & Country shack. They could at least afford to shore up the building and hopefully sell it to someone who actually cares.

168
Junior MemberJunior Member
168

PostAug 27, 2007#12

Aren't the Sansones supposed to be good Catholics (the 10 kids per family kind)? I hope they are shamed into doing something. The exterior problem deserves attention, but ignoring the life safety issues is unforgivable. Would they let their children sleep in this building??????

766
Super MemberSuper Member
766

PostSep 11, 2007#13

Expat wrote:Glad to see others like this building, too. It is a landmark and represents an era in big cities.


Which era is that? The one of putting up large, monolithic buildings with no consideration for the surrounding neighborhood and/or how the building will fit in?



Sorry all... Council Plaza was a cool-enough looking building 20 years ago, but it has ALWAYS been a terrible location for a high-rise. It's residents are trapped between a double-decker freeway and a depressed local highway. Then instead of building it flush with Grand Blvd so that its one good side could take advantage of street traffic, they set it back and developed a plaza that no-one can see, much less desire to shop in.



About the only good use for it, if it were fixed up, would be as SLU student housing -- as much of the retail space could be converted into shops and services for students. For any other use, I think redevelopers would find traffic constraints will always pose the same problems.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostSep 11, 2007#14

I hope they ditch the idea of the cheesy art on the side of the buildings...

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostSep 11, 2007#15

Tysalpha wrote:About the only good use for it, if it were fixed up, would be as SLU student housing -- as much of the retail space could be converted into shops and services for students. For any other use, I think redevelopers would find traffic constraints will always pose the same problems.


That seems like the most viable and attractive option to me as well. I wonder what the Billiken students and alumni on this forum would think?

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostSep 11, 2007#16

I thought that at some point within the last 5 years, SLU was in negotiations to buy Council Plaza, but for some unknown reason the deal fell through.



The more I think about it the more I thought I read it in the alumni magazine that I get periodically. Any other SLU alums remember this?