11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 17, 2010#201

Alex Ihnen wrote:400 employees is a nice addition to CORTEX and their close collaboration with WU is good as well. I'm guessing that this means a new building.
EDIT :wink: : 30 employees is a nice addition to CORTEX and their close collaboration with WU is good as well. I'm guessing that this does not mean a new building. WU currently leases much of the CORTEX 1 building I believe, they can likely find room there?

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostMay 18, 2010#202

Addendum: This is what happens when you're not a center for R&D like we are.

It's not happy news outside of Saint Louis, but it does reflect on how much the company values the metro area long-term for competent science, both in retaining the core of its R&D program here and its cooperative efforts with Washington University Med, BJC, and CORTeX, expanding their operations amidst massive contraction. Source is below; note the last paragraph particularly in relation to yesterday's announcement:

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... rround=lfn
Tuesday, May 18, 2010, 10:34am CDT
Pfizer to cut 6,000 jobs, close eight plants
St. Louis Business Journal

Pfizer Inc. plans to eliminate 6,000 manufacturing jobs over the next 18 months to five years as it closes eight plants and reduces operations at six others.

The cuts are part of the New York-based pharmaceutical giant’s larger plan to eliminate more than 19,000 jobs and reduce costs by $5 billion by the end of 2012, following its $68 billion acquisition of Wyeth.

St. Louis, where Pfizer has research operations, is not affected by Tuesday’s announcement, a company spokesman said. The drug company (NYSE: PFE) previously announced 600 layoffs from its 1,000-member work force in Chesterfield, Mo., through 2011.

Pfizer said Tuesday it plans to exit sites in New York, Virginia, Puerto Rico and Ireland. The company plans to reduce plant operations in North Carolina, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico, Ireland, United Kingdom and Germany.

“The restructuring of our global plant network is critical to our efforts to remain competitive so that we can continue to meet patient needs and expand the access and affordability of our medicines Pfizer Global Manufacturing President Nat Ricciardi said in a statement. “We must continue to adjust to the fast-changing and extremely competitive environment in which we operate. That means realigning our network and reducing our manufacturing capacity so that we can position Pfizer for the next phase of growth across biopharmaceuticals and our diversified business portfolio.”
Or: Patents on our best drugs will soon be expiring, and we're dumping less strategic operations to focus on R&D in creating a new line of wonder drugs. And, we hope all those WashU researchers can go over our inventory of drugs & compounds and find something new we can do with them. Remember that Viagra was originally meant as heart medicine, promoting blood flow, before the researchers conducting trials noticed the ancillary effects of the drug.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJul 13, 2010#203

An interesting take on "Top-Down Tech Clusters" from BusinessWeek:

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ ... 047892.htm
Entrepreneurs, not buildings and real estate, are the key to innovation and economic growth. Yes, a region needs good infrastructure and a pool of educated talent to develop a technology hub. But governments can't manufacture innovation by putting a set of fancy buildings next to a university, as Russia plans to do.

To build the next wave of successful clusters, governments should provide creative, risk-taking entrepreneurs with the means to start companies and build networks. They should provide seed financing and tax breaks for entrepreneurs, welcome skilled immigrants, and improve educational resources. That's the formula for nurturing entrepreneurship.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 13, 2010#204

^ But it doesn't have to be an either/or. CORTEX is much less a place or a set of buildings than it is an area for those mentioned above to utilize.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 13, 2010#205

I hope or think the author is getting at the balance, in the end you will need both. The creativity and network that promote talents, skills and ideas along with an infrastructure that can support an idea becoming a reality. I think Cortex is taking the right approach. Stakeholders who have a big interest in seeing ideas go to frutition that can develop an area for which you can build out infrastructure as needed.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostJul 14, 2010#206

The key for the biotech industry is the specialized wet lab space. Even with the talent, you've got nothing without the labs.

What I want more than wet labs: venture capital.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostFeb 11, 2011#207

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news ... nomed.html

The Biz Journal says a new biotech startup called Nanomed "... is looking ... to open a manufacturing facility, hire consultants and fund pre-clinical studies. [They] also want to hire a CEO and three to five people from the biotech industry for [their] staff. MacEwan is in talks for additional funding from Prolog Ventures and Biogenerator, a St. Louis-based life sciences organization, among others. He wants to find space to work at the Center for Emerging Technologies, Cortex or Biogenerator."

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMay 12, 2011#208

Nice Article about Cortex and CERT in the latest addition of St Louis commerce magazine noting the combination of the two, its new organization and the fact that they have 97% occupancy on wet lab space (page 48). It also states the desire to put in 150,000 sf of new space by either rehab or construction. You can get the digital edition from the link below.

Its also interesting to note another article in the same issue featuring HOK's zero design building. They conveniently picked a location at Forest Park parkway and Sarah Ave to model it (page 72). Which also ties into comment about future metrolink station between BJC and Grand as noted in the Cortex.

Can't draw too much into is, but their is some great articles on the region's strengths in the bioscience field and some ideas to leverage it. The HOK net zero article towards the end was a nice touch

http://www.stlcommercemagazine.com/arch ... eflip.html

PostNov 10, 2011#209

Good news coming out of the CORTEX crowd as reported by Tim Logan. Curious to see what is going to happen with this proposal. Also, Shriner not too far behind? It would make a good 2012.


http://www.stltoday.com/business/column ... 0f31a.html

The city's biggest science park is about to get bigger.

CORTEX is poised to start construction next spring on a $120 million expansion that will nearly double its campus in the Central West End, said president Dennis Lower.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostNov 11, 2011#210

Update and rehab speculation (on my part): http://nextstl.com/central-corridor/cor ... renovation

1,518
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,518

PostFeb 03, 2012#211


13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 03, 2012#212

How can they have state-of-art facilities with all those old buildings around?!

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 03, 2012#213

quincunx wrote:How can they have state-of-art facilities with all those old buildings around?!
:)

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostFeb 03, 2012#214

quincunx wrote:How can they have state-of-art facilities with all those old buildings around?!
love the comment

Isn't SLU part of CORTEX?

PostFeb 03, 2012#215

The one part that hope doesn't work is the proposed metrolink if it's BJC's way of getting Euclid station moved to Kingshighway. Maybe some strong opinions out there, but believe an Euclid and Sarah Street metrolink station combo is much better then Kingshighway and Boyle Ave. Especially if some additional residential/mixed can get kicked start along Euclid and FPSE. Any thoughts?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 03, 2012#216

^I'm with you there. Moving the Euclid station absolutely not. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

A new Sarah Street station is better because it'll have a better connection to the Grove. Sprucing up Sarah between the station and Manchester would be needed too of course. I'd love to see that little building by the tracks at Sarah used somehow. If there's nice pathway to the west for CORTEX workers I think it would work for all.

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostFeb 03, 2012#217

What about a Euclid/Boyle combo which seems increasingly likely as of late?

After I reposted the NextSTL story on relocating the CWE MetroLink station to my Gateway Streets blog, a PhilS wrote a very extensive comment that is an interesting read. After noting the differences between BJC and WUSM which I ignored when writing the article, PhilS closed his comment with:
I would venture it’s more of one hand saying “what if” and the other hand not really caring for the moment. When it gets down to it, it will be quickly clear that moving the station west along the tracks to where it passes underneath Kingshighway (placing the station underneath the WUSM’s Northwest Tower and SLCH Parking Garage) is not really going to happen. It’s more likely to expand a bit further east, closer to Taylor Avenue if anything.

But, as always in this town, you never know what people are thinking. It’s good to keep an eye on it.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 03, 2012#218

quincunx wrote:^I'm with you there. Moving the Euclid station absolutely not. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

A new Sarah Street station is better because it'll have a better connection to the Grove. Sprucing up Sarah between the station and Manchester would be needed too of course. I'd love to see that little building by the tracks at Sarah used somehow. If there's nice pathway to the west for CORTEX workers I think it would work for all.
Looking at a map, I think the Boyle station would serve FPSE and eastern CWE much better than a Sarah stop. Also, CORTEX doesn't own the land around a Sarah stop.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 03, 2012#219

I'm seeing a shorter walk along Sarah to Manchester. And will the new highway interchange be more or less pleasant for pedestrians? I guess I'm looking at it more from a visitor's perspective than a resident's.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 03, 2012#220

^ Right, but Sarah only gets you to the very eastern point of The Grove - the neighborhood's very narrow there and there's little residential. Even for visitors, they'd likely be better served arriving via Boyle.

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostFeb 03, 2012#221

I love the plan. I'm glad St. Louis is taking part in real planning again. Hopefully we can get a Downtown master plan sometime soon.

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostFeb 05, 2012#222

goat314 wrote:I love the plan. I'm glad St. Louis is taking part in real planning again. Hopefully we can get a Downtown master plan sometime soon.
I agree. Even if there are parts of the plan that need some attention, there is a lot of positive to take from the current proposal. I love the building adaptation, the economic potential, the incorporation of transit and the really promising open space. I would love to plan and design this place!

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostFeb 05, 2012#223

Alex Ihnen wrote:^ Right, but Sarah only gets you to the very eastern point of The Grove - the neighborhood's very narrow there and there's little residential. Even for visitors, they'd likely be better served arriving via Boyle.
I agree, but for some reason I often see people walking Sarah at all hours of the day--even at night when the area is not very well lit--between West End Lofts and Manchester, but I rarely see anyone on Boyle. Finding your way to the bars in "The Grove" on foot from a Boyle Metrolink stop could be tedious, but great for FPSE residents.

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostFeb 05, 2012#224

Overall, this is a very exciting plan! It will be great to see more activity and life in this area.

As far as the potential new Metro stops go, both seem like they put you 0.4-0.5 miles from Manchester, and each would need some serious lighting and infrastructure upgrades to be inviting to your average St. Louisan, but I think either would be fine in the long run.

My main concern with Boyle is the proposed Boyle-Tower Grover interchange with I-64 (nextSTL article). What will the new Boyle look like? What will the traffic be like? What will the pedestrian experience be like? Does the road plan account for (hoped) increased pedestrian traffic into the Grove, or is it simply to move cars? The improvements described for the pedestrian experience seem pretty modest. The same goes for the new Metro stop, is it being built just to bring people to work at CORTEX, or is the planning more robust? Right now, my impression is that the planners aren't really considering this sort of stuff, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 06, 2012#225

^ excellent point regarding pedestrians on Boyle. I do think that the best pedestrian routes are also those with a decent amount of car traffic. I'd always rather walk down a street with others travelling that space as well (even if in a car), than a street with zero activity.

Read more posts (2311 remaining)