yeah, yeah - and if you guys ever compiled an all time greatest typos section I'm sure I would figure prominantly as well.....
who is the Michael Shermer guy?
who is the Michael Shermer guy?
Atlas wrote:What's amazing to me is that no one has stopped to educate themselves on the matter. I was at a party over the weekend and a few people who are religious fundamentalists were talking about the issue and asking each other questions like, "Would a clone be considered human?" I'm laughing to myself at the stupidity of their questions. I've also had conversations with people who said they are voting no because their church simply told them to. As Tysalpa said, do you really think that the issue is about growing human's and one day we'll see ourselves hanging out at a bar somewhere? This is about stem cell research, finding cures using a very promising technology. Let's move past the 16th century witch hunt mentality and look at the issue for what it is. Once upon a time it was considered wrong and immoral to dissect the human body
markofucity wrote:and yes - I see the point made above. It is a debate about when an entity becomes fully human, with all the legal protections that involves. That's the only real issue that underlies this issue and abortion. Problem is that I don;t beleive anyone can definatively answer that question. Its always going to be a matter of philisophic conjectrure. Society DOES have to make a choice though. What always gets me is that it seems as if we have ... abortion IS legal. It makes no sense to draw the "when does human life begin" line at different places on diffrent issues. If stem cell research cannot proceed because an embryo (or blastocyte) is a human being - then abortion cannot be legal when the pregnancy is voluntary and presents no undue threat to the mother. You can't have it BOTH ways. I'm not saying that the topic shouldn;t be debated - but the law should be consistent.
Ihnen wrote:The site for the new Solae headquarters has now been cleared. I hope the new building moves along quickly. Looking at the drawings again I'm pretty excited. I think the CWE will continue to have some beautiful historic buildings, but a modern research center is a welcome addition.
Grover wrote:^ Agreed - the green space looks out of place, but I don't know about a plaza/fountain either. I haven't seen a site plan for the whole of CORTEX, if there is one, but I hope there's something of a campus in mind - maybe with a couple retail slots centrally located. Currently, workers can't easily walk to eat (OK -maybe that's a stretch, as Bread Co. and Euclid aren't that far). I really hope there's a focus for the area though - a plaza would be great if it were near a signature building. I say preserve the building below (it's 1/2 block from a possible METRO stop at Sarah) and centrally located within CORTEX) and put in a cafe/etc., then orient development towards this. I know there will be some surface lots and garages, but these should be placed at the edges. Garages should back up against existing BJC/Wash U and possibly close to Duncan/Vandeventer where it may be able to serve future retail along FPP (Target, etc.?).