1,689
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,689

PostJul 06, 2017#126

Are they going to be installing turnstiles like there have been rumblings about initiating a study? Might as well just build them here and see how they work instead of wasting a year or more on a study. We know that they're a good idea, it's just about putting them in.

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostJul 06, 2017#127

bwcrow1s wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
Are they going to be installing turnstiles like there have been rumblings about initiating a study? Might as well just build them here and see how they work instead of wasting a year or more on a study. We know that they're a good idea, it's just about putting them in.
How do we know turnstiles are a good idea? (serious question)
  • Systems with them still have crime.
  • Systems with them still have fare evasion.
  • Will likely cost more than the money than they save from reduced fare evasion.
  • Hundreds of systems around the world are successfully operating without them.

227
Junior MemberJunior Member
227

PostJul 06, 2017#128

mill204 wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
bwcrow1s wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
Are they going to be installing turnstiles like there have been rumblings about initiating a study? Might as well just build them here and see how they work instead of wasting a year or more on a study. We know that they're a good idea, it's just about putting them in.
How do we know turnstiles are a good idea? (serious question)
  • Systems with them still have crime.
  • Systems with them still have fare evasion.
  • Will likely cost more than the money than they save from reduced fare evasion.
  • Hundreds of systems around the world are successfully operating without them.
How about just hiring more security to check tickets on all trains? More security means less ticket evasion and you get the benefit of extra security on the train. You cannot get that with a turnstile. Extra bonus of more people with jobs.

1,689
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,689

PostJul 06, 2017#129

dmelsh wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
mill204 wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
bwcrow1s wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
Are they going to be installing turnstiles like there have been rumblings about initiating a study? Might as well just build them here and see how they work instead of wasting a year or more on a study. We know that they're a good idea, it's just about putting them in.
How do we know turnstiles are a good idea? (serious question)
  • Systems with them still have crime.
  • Systems with them still have fare evasion.
  • Will likely cost more than the money than they save from reduced fare evasion.
  • Hundreds of systems around the world are successfully operating without them.
How about just hiring more security to check tickets on all trains? More security means less ticket evasion and you get the benefit of extra security on the train. You cannot get that with a turnstile. Extra bonus of more people with jobs.
There should already be armed security on board and platforms. I'm saying vertical turnstiles where you can't hop over them.

At some point they need to go all in, in my opinion. I don't think Metro even makes money off of fares as it is, right?

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostJul 06, 2017#130

bwcrow1s wrote:
Jul 06, 2017
There should already be armed security on board and platforms. I'm saying vertical turnstiles where you can't hop over them.

At some point they need to go all in, in my opinion. I don't think Metro even makes money off of fares as it is, right?
Even systems with full height barriers have fare evasion. I've had my ticket checked in Paris multiple time while transferring between lines.

MetroLinks's farebox recovery ratio is presently ~25%; used to be ~30%. Virtually no public transportation systems in the world make a profit from fares.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 25, 2017#131

stlgasm wrote:
Jun 24, 2017
Umm... so beyond the ceremonial groundbreaking, has construction actually started on this? Because I just drove by and I saw a whole lotta nothin'.
Any signs of progress?

53
New MemberNew Member
53

PostJul 25, 2017#132

Yep. The first contractor has been awarded. They will be in charge of the first phase of the project, which includes facility work such as electrical, plumbing, structure, sidewalks and benches. This contract is the first of five that will be awarded to address the construction project.

wabash wrote:
Jul 25, 2017
stlgasm wrote:
Jun 24, 2017
Umm... so beyond the ceremonial groundbreaking, has construction actually started on this? Because I just drove by and I saw a whole lotta nothin'.
Any signs of progress?

1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostJul 25, 2017#133

Matthew Hibbard wrote:
Jul 25, 2017
Yep. The first contractor has been awarded. They will be in charge of the first phase of the project, which includes facility work such as electrical, plumbing, structure, sidewalks and benches. This contract is the first of five that will be awarded to address the construction project.

wabash wrote:
Jul 25, 2017
stlgasm wrote:
Jun 24, 2017
Umm... so beyond the ceremonial groundbreaking, has construction actually started on this? Because I just drove by and I saw a whole lotta nothin'.
Any signs of progress?
So no.

53
New MemberNew Member
53

PostJul 25, 2017#134

aprice wrote:
Jul 25, 2017
Matthew Hibbard wrote:
Jul 25, 2017
Yep. The first contractor has been awarded. They will be in charge of the first phase of the project, which includes facility work such as electrical, plumbing, structure, sidewalks and benches. This contract is the first of five that will be awarded to address the construction project.

wabash wrote:
Jul 25, 2017


Any signs of progress?
So no.
Umm...ok.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 25, 2017#135

Tough crowd.

251
Full MemberFull Member
251

PostAug 03, 2017#136

Did someone say nothing was happening here?

https://twitter.com/STLMetro/status/891016934531231746

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostAug 03, 2017#137

is that little brick building near the crossing going to be incorporated into this project somehow? in the video there was a bunch of equipment and people gathered around it. it's such a cool little structure. i hope it gets re-purposed in some fashion.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostAug 03, 2017#138

No. They're just removing the third track that runs close to it.

251
Full MemberFull Member
251

PostAug 03, 2017#139

They're also tearing out a lot of weeds, trees, etc all around the area. You can now see an old train turntable south of the metro tracks, east of Sarah.

6,158
Life MemberLife Member
6,158

PostAug 04, 2017#140

That's an old Wabash turntable. They had a roundhouse and engine servicing facility there, a small yard and team tracks to the north, and a station at Vandeventer. The brick building is an old tower that presumably controlled the interlocking in and out of all of that. If you're curious about the history I can look into it through the WRHS. I'd love to see that building preserved, but I'm not quite sure how to do it.

2,330
Life MemberLife Member
2,330

PostAug 04, 2017#141

That building is on my list of purchases when I became an eccentric millionaire.
Coffee/wine bar in the tower, home of the 'Cortex Model Railroad Club' in the bottom.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostAug 04, 2017#142

shadrach wrote: That building is on my list of purchases when I became an eccentric millionaire.
Coffee/wine bar in the tower, home of the 'Cortex Model Railroad Club' in the bottom.
You should start an "...when I become an eccentric billionaire..." thread. :D

I don't know if the tower is enough square footage for a coffee shop/wine bar plus ADA restriction could become a pain. I'd recommend flipping it and giving the model train society the tower and putting your coffee shop on the ground floor. Maybe I under estimate the popularity of model trains tough...?

53
New MemberNew Member
53

PostAug 04, 2017#143

Hey all! Okay, so some bad news. The brick building, formally an old railroad yard tower, is now used by Metro for storage. However, with the build out of the Cortex MetroLink Station and the expanded greenway, it will soon be demolished.
urban_dilettante wrote:
Aug 03, 2017
is that little brick building near the crossing going to be incorporated into this project somehow? in the video there was a bunch of equipment and people gathered around it. it's such a cool little structure. i hope it gets re-purposed in some fashion.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 04, 2017#144

Matthew Hibbard wrote:
Aug 04, 2017
Hey all! Okay, so some bad news. The brick building, formally an old railroad yard tower, is now used by Metro for storage. However, with the build out of the Cortex MetroLink Station and the expanded greenway, it will soon be demolished.
urban_dilettante wrote:
Aug 03, 2017
is that little brick building near the crossing going to be incorporated into this project somehow? in the video there was a bunch of equipment and people gathered around it. it's such a cool little structure. i hope it gets re-purposed in some fashion.
Why not keep it? Try something creative?

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostAug 04, 2017#145

Matthew Hibbard wrote:
Aug 04, 2017
Hey all! Okay, so some bad news. The brick building, formally an old railroad yard tower, is now used by Metro for storage. However, with the build out of the Cortex MetroLink Station and the expanded greenway, it will soon be demolished.
yeah, why? it's a small building--it couldn't be that expensive to maintain. it would make a great spot for a cafe or something. god, i wish this town had more foresight/vision regarding its built environment.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 04, 2017#146

urban_dilettante wrote:
Aug 04, 2017
Matthew Hibbard wrote:
Aug 04, 2017
Hey all! Okay, so some bad news. The brick building, formally an old railroad yard tower, is now used by Metro for storage. However, with the build out of the Cortex MetroLink Station and the expanded greenway, it will soon be demolished.
yeah, why? it's a small building--it couldn't be that expensive to maintain. it would make a great spot for a cafe or something. god, i wish this town had more foresight/vision regarding its built environment.
This is the type of building that makes a place interesting. When we tear them down, STL becomes a lot less interesting.

8,924
Life MemberLife Member
8,924

PostAug 04, 2017#147

debaliviere wrote:
urban_dilettante wrote:
Aug 04, 2017
Matthew Hibbard wrote:
Aug 04, 2017
Hey all! Okay, so some bad news. The brick building, formally an old railroad yard tower, is now used by Metro for storage. However, with the build out of the Cortex MetroLink Station and the expanded greenway, it will soon be demolished.
yeah, why? it's a small building--it couldn't be that expensive to maintain. it would make a great spot for a cafe or something. god, i wish this town had more foresight/vision regarding its built environment.
This is the type of building that makes a place interesting. When we tear them down, STL becomes a lot less interesting.

Couldn't agree more

6,158
Life MemberLife Member
6,158

PostAug 05, 2017#148

If anybody has Metrolink's ear and could talk to them about selling or donating I'd be happy to bring this to the attention of the WRHS. The historical society needs a good fund raising candidate, and this seems like a solid one. We lost WABIC tower in Decatur a couple of years back. WRHS was closely involved in fund raising for the 573 restoration, so this may not be as off the wall as it sounds. And the annual meeting is . . . next month, I believe.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 18, 2017#149


5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 18, 2017#150

Metro should be hit in the head for their decision to demolish the building.

Read more posts (75 remaining)