$110 million St. Louis Centre complex redevelopment

Discuss construction activity, including hotel projects, major renovations, office projects, entertainment areas, streetscape improvements, etc...


Moderators: DeBaliviere, ThreeOneFour, Forum Moderators

Postby bchao524 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:42 pm

Sorry for the double post!
bchao524
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: University City

Postby MattnSTL » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:47 pm

Could be a lot worse than that. Nothing groundbreaking, but decent enough. What really disappoints me is the sidewalk will still be covered. I know the columns are structural, but I really wish they were getting tucked back into the proper building line.
Visit my blog

See what's new in Old North
MattnSTL
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 5624
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: St. Louis City- North Hampton/ONSL

Postby DeBaliviere » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:48 pm

MattnSTL wrote:Could be a lot worse than that. Nothing groundbreaking, but decent enough. What really disappoints me is the sidewalk will still be covered. I know the columns are structural, but I really wish they were getting tucked back into the proper building line.




True. The Washington side will be much improved though. It looks like the entry at 7th Street will be built out toward the sidewalk, which will definitely be better.
"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not."

--Dr. Seuss, The Lorax

Visit my Downtown Business/Real Estate Blog
User avatar
DeBaliviere
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 8256
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Warson Woods

Postby JMedwick » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:12 pm

You know Matt, some street narrowing could provide an expanded sidewalk with non-covered strolling space.
"There's a rainbow

And all of the colors are black

Its not that the colors aren't there

Its just imagination they lack"

"Nothing but the dead and dying

Back in my little town"

-My Little Town, Simon & Garfunkel
JMedwick
Life Member
Life Member
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:24 pm

Postby STLDTFAN » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:17 pm

So..... I have not seen any specifics, so will ask. Has all the financing been put in place, or is this still contingent on that (aka...is this just a pipe dream right now)?
STLDTFAN
Expert Member
Expert Member
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:29 pm

Postby MattnSTL » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:22 pm

JMedwick wrote:You know Matt, some street narrowing could provide an expanded sidewalk with non-covered strolling space.




I considered that, but it doesn't seem like it is going to happen. I would like to see 2 way traffic along 7th.
Visit my blog

See what's new in Old North
MattnSTL
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 5624
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: St. Louis City- North Hampton/ONSL

Postby JMedwick » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:27 pm

^ Just depends on what the City values more, additional sidewalk space or the potential on-street parking in front of the businesses. Given that we are talking about St. Louis, the on-street parking would probably be more valuable. As for narrowing streets, I would think you could do it along 6th and maybe one side of 7th (with all of those garages along 7th, it is one street downtown that may need travel lanes).
"There's a rainbow

And all of the colors are black

Its not that the colors aren't there

Its just imagination they lack"

"Nothing but the dead and dying

Back in my little town"

-My Little Town, Simon & Garfunkel
JMedwick
Life Member
Life Member
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:24 pm

Postby goat314 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:16 pm

RENDERINGS!!!!!!!!!!!



This look is very new to St. Louis. I would like to see more advertising in downtown. As long as its done in a tasteful way.



Image
goat314
Super Member
Super Member
 
Posts: 906
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:41 pm

Postby ThreeOneFour » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:43 pm

Finally, we've got a rendering! That took long enough. I was beginning to think the renderings were guarded more carefully than Dick Cheney's whereabouts between 2001 and 2008. :wink:



Overall it looks better than I expected. I could really do without the "Park" sign, since I think the ramps are going to make that one pretty obvious just as they are pretty obvious on at least one-third of the structures in downtown. And I hope the glass is heavily tinted to block the view of the cars inside as much as possible.



What's still missing is anything resembling a timeline, or any firm commitments for what will go in the space. Obviously I didn't expect the latter news for some time now, but in today's article the movie theater "might" be part of the plan. So even that is not a sure thing.



Once again, we are settling for less. I am trying really hard to be positive about this- hopefully the developer will do a far better job of attracting retailers to the ground floor than many developers downtown have done so far. And despite the fact that chain retailers and restaurants as a group have taken a serious beating around here lately, I think this is the perfect spot for a concentration of chains, and their presence should help Macy's as well.
ThreeOneFour
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 4448
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:33 am
Location: Carondelet

Postby newstl2020 » Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:29 am

Would you rather have that above, or what's currently there?



I for one am ok with it for sure. Especially if they get good tenants!
"The tallest buildings are those that hold within them the greatest collections of power."
newstl2020
Super Member
Super Member
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul

Postby bonwich » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:40 am

If you look closely, 7th remains one way, and there are no meters in front of the retail, channeling anyone who wants to stop and park into the garage. Wanna bet that isn't just part of the rendering?
bonwich
Totally Addicted
Totally Addicted
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:35 am

Postby ThreeOneFour » Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:25 pm

newstl2020 wrote:Would you rather have that above, or what's currently there?



I for one am ok with it for sure. Especially if they get good tenants!




Just because I'm not 100% happy with the rendering doesn't mean it isn't a vast improvement over what is there presently.



Of course, if the developer attracts quality tenants, that will be a significant plus. However, that is based on the assumption that this developer will do a far better job of attracting tenants during a recession than other developers have in recent history. There's a vast space still available at The Syndicate. The retail space at the Marquette Garage is still empty. And now the developer says 600 Washington "might" include a movie theater. Naturally an improved building, even if the upper floors are wasted for parking, will be an improvement over the eyesore we have now. I'm just skeptical about the overall impact compared to the original plan which would have included hundreds of condos instead of more parking.



bonwich wrote:If you look closely, 7th remains one way, and there are no meters in front of the retail, channeling anyone who wants to stop and park into the garage. Wanna bet that isn't just part of the rendering?




No, I don't want to bet, because I think you're right. I would hope that the city would at least install meters in front of the place, even if they neglect to make Seventh Street two-way, which is what they should do in my opinion. I won't count on it, though, as it makes too much sense.
ThreeOneFour
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Posts: 4448
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:33 am
Location: Carondelet

Postby jNewt » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:21 pm

No one has posted the rendering I saw a few weeks back so hopefully that will show up at some point. In the meantime, I'll describe what I saw. The view is from 6th and Washington, and the same green glass shown in the already posted rendering wraps around to 6th Street. There is ground level retail that wraps around the corner of the building from Washington to face the MetroLink entrance. The retail only appeared to extend along the eastern-facing section of the building near the MetroLink station while the northern-facing section by the station served as the building's main entrance. A large sign over the entrance said "600 Washington" though I won't be surprised if that touch is scaled down from its rendered size. Just as the small skybridge over 7th street is not shown in the above rendering, the connection over 6th Street was also missing. I can't say what the side of the building facing Locust will look like as I haven't seen any renderings of that.
jNewt
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:04 pm

Postby Downtown2007 » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:01 pm

I am not impressed by the descriptions nor the renderings. I think 750 parking spaces covering 3 of the 4 floors of the building are a total waste. Even if thet can attract tenents for the retail spaces how to they plan on sustaning them with the parking above? The 750 spaces will create a void in density which limits the grownt in that area. I think we all agree that the MX project was a pipe dream but at least it was a vision for the future. I am really disappointed and think this is just another example for settling for the status quo. I would also be suprised if the movie theater ever becomes a reality.
Downtown2007
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:06 am
Location: South City

Postby Framer » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:39 pm

I'm very dissapointed with the rendering.



What some people see as colored glass, I interpret as painted metal bars (parking garages must be well ventilated, remember). The retail on the first floor is nice, of course, but I'm afraid this is just another huge, boring garage.



I had hopes for this project, but this is much less than I had expected.
Framer
Life Member
Life Member
 
Posts: 3781
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: southside

PreviousNext

Return to Projects and Construction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests