Tapatalk

Catholic Church Bldg Reuse/Conversion/Renovation

Catholic Church Bldg Reuse/Conversion/Renovation

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJun 10, 2005#1

Want to buy in a church?

By Charlene Prost

Associated Press

06/09/2005



Catholic churches, with their ornate sanctuaries and choir lofts, soaring ceilings and stained-glass windows, might not seem like a place to work or call home.



But developer Pete Rothschild is thinking housing these days as he checks out some of the 20 churches and other buildings the Archdiocese of St. Louis has on the sale block.



"I would make the choir loft part of a living area," said Rothschild, who already is recycling some of the old St. Louis Public Schools buildings for housing.



"The real challenge with these churches, though, are the sanctuaries," he said. "There's a lot of cubic feet there, and with the high ceilings, it might be a little drafty for a single resident. ... But I'm definitely interested."



What's attracting Rothschild, other developers, public and private school officials - even other churches - is the largest sale of parish buildings in archdiocese history. It's the result of consolidating Catholics in south St. Louis and north St. Louis County into fewer parishes.



Altogether, the archdiocese is selling more than 80 buildings. Thirteen churches with related schools and other parish buildings, most built in the 1950s and 1960s, include about 90 acres in North County; the rest, generally older properties, are in south St. Louis. The oldest church, St. Boniface, dates to 1860.



Most buildings have been in use and are in good condition, said real estate agents selling them for the archdiocese. But there are exceptions.



"Some schools closed long ago do have maintenance problems," said Hal Ball at Hilliker Corp., which is selling properties in St. Louis. "But generally, the buildings have been pretty well kept up."



If the archdiocese gets the asking prices, the properties would bring in more than $30 million.



But money is not the primary object of this sale, said Thomas Richter, director of building and real estate at the archdiocese.



"We want to get the listed price, but we would consider tinkering with that if someone comes in with a proposal we really like," he said. "These parishes have been important anchors in their neighborhoods, and we want to leave behind a positive legacy.



"Our preference is to sell to another faith, for religious use, or to a school," he said, adding, "And generally, we don't want the buildings used for anything that would be sordid, distasteful or objectionable to the church."



With that in mind, the archdiocese is compiling a list of reuse proposals it would reject.



"A clinic for abortions would be out, for example," Richter said. "Also, no bars, hair salons, no commercial, such as an auto body shop. We are concerned about restaurants that serve alcohol. I don't think there'd be an objection to a very nice restaurant. But we don't want a bar that sells hamburgers."



Richter said the archdiocese will remove statutes, relics, and "anything that makes the church Catholic" before the structures are sold.



For the same reason, he said, the archdiocese will take out some stained- glass windows.



"If we sell to another religious group that intends to use it as a house of worship, we will allow the windows to remain," he said. "But if we sell to someone for commercial use, we will remove windows that have a religious connotation."



That aspect of the sale is raising concerns among some preservationists.



"The stained-glass windows are part of the buildings, and to remove them will certainly lower their value and affect their architectural significance," said Carolyn Toft, executive director of the Landmarks Association of St. Louis Inc.



"Removing them could also impair our ability to get churches listed on the National Register of Historic Places," she noted, a requirement for developers looking to use historic tax credits to offset renovation costs.



Richter said the archdiocese is trying to protect its religious heritage and, for that reason, also will prohibit use of a church's name after it is sold.



"We don't want someone to disrespectfully reuse the name," he said. "We don't want to see, for example, 'Condos at St. Aloysius.'"

Mix of interests



At least initially, prospective buyers must submit one proposal for all buildings at each property, rather than proposals for individual buildings. The exception is Holy Innocents in the city. The entire property is listed at $1.6 million. But buildings also are listed separately at prices ranging from $550,000 for the 48-year-old church to $300,000 for the rectory.



Ball said most of the parish complexes were constructed over the years with related buildings, some of which are attached, and the archdiocese prefers to sell them as groups.



But at Holy Innocents, the layout is different. "The buildings separate out easily, so we decided to sell them that way," Ball said.



If the other properties don't sell as complexes, he said, "Later, we'll look at breaking them up."



Hilliker and Linda M. Wash Real Estate LLC already are giving tours to would-be buyers and set bid deadlines of July 14 and Aug. 11 for properties in the city.



So far, the tours are attracting a mix of potential buyers.



"We just had 20 plus people through Holy Innocents ... several church groups, a youth hostel group looking at the convent, some redevelopers looking to maybe take the rectory and turn it into a three- or four-family" residential building, Ball said. "We're also expecting maybe theater or performance type groups and perhaps a restaurant."



In North County, Trammell Crow Co. is selling the properties without bid deadlines and already has some proposals.



Agent Pamela Even said properties there mainly are attracting public school districts, private schools, other religious groups and some developers. While buildings in that area generally are more modern, there are exceptions.



At St. Aloysius, there's a convent built in 1908 and a school in 1928. There's also the "quilt" building at Corpus Christi. "At one time it housed the boiler system," Even said. " Now it's a gathering place for quilters."



Toft, at Landmarks, wants the archdiocese to do what St. Louis Public Schools officials did last year when the district put nearly 40 surplus buildings on the block. To make sure historic ones were properly preserved, the district required buyers to follow rehab guidelines and construction timetables.



Only St. Boniface is listed on the historic register now, but Toft said most church properties in St. Louis are eligible. County preservation historian Esley Hamilton said some church buildings there, although not listed, are "good examples of modern architecture" that should be preserved.



Richter said the archdiocese wants to see its buildings "reused as much as possible," but also wants to be flexible in working with buyers. He expects many of them, particularly in more populated North County, to sell and reopen quickly.



"School districts there are looking for space and are potential buyers, as are preschools, day schools and other church denominations," he said. "I think we will have sold half of them by the time the churches are closed."





Archdiocese complexes for sale



Property #Address #Price



South St. Louis

1. Holy Family, 1.5 acres 4125 Humphrey Street $1.69 million

2. Holy Innocents, 1.9 acres 4223 Odell Street $1.65 million

3. Immaculate Conception, 1.2 acres 3120 Lafayette Avenue $1.38 million

4. St. Aloysius Gonzaga, 2.1 acres 5608 North Magnolia Avenue $1.48 million

5. St. Boniface, 2.1 acres 7622 Michigan Avenue $1.78 million

6. St. Hedwig, 1.2 acres 3202 Pulaski Street $900,000

7. St. Thomas of Aquin, 3/4 acre 3949 Iowa Street $475,000



Agents: Hilliker Corp. and Linda M. Wash Real Estate LLC. Tour, bid deadlines and other information available online at hillikercorp.com and LMWash.com.





North County

1. Corpus Christi, 5.8 acres 8449 Jennings Station Road $2.5 million

2. North American Martyrs, 4.7 acres 1350 South Lafayette Avenue $2.3 million

3. Our Lady of Fatima, 7.2 acres 4450 Washington Street $1.84 million

4. Our Lady of Good Counsel, 9.7 acres 1134-60 St. Cyr Road $2.37 million

5. Our Lady of Mercy, 6.5 acres 5323 Ville Maria Lane $1.14 million

6. Transfiguration, 7.6 acres 12555 Partridge Run Drive $2.17 million

7. St. Aloysius, 8.1 acres 12110 Larimore Road $907,500

8. St. Bartholomew, 9.8 acres 8368 Latty Avenue $935,000

9. St. Catherine of Alexandria, 2.7 acres 351 Chambers Road $1.27 million

10. St. Christopher, 6.6 acres 11755 Mehl Avenue $1.56 million

11. St. Pius X, 7.5 acres 335 Shepley Drive $1.1 million

12. St. Sebastian, 6.1 acres 9950 Glen Owen Drive $1.87 million

13. St. William, 7.3 acres 9330 Stansberry Avenue $1.45 million



Agent: Trammell Crow Co.; more information is online at trammellcrow.com.





Reporter Charlene Prost

E-mail: cprost@post-dispatch.com

Phone: 314-340-8140

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostJun 13, 2005#2

Convert churches? The presbyterian in Laffayette Square, okay, but catholic churches? I have a difficult time thinking of a sanctuary being used for living instead of worshiping. Sad subject. :(

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostJun 13, 2005#3

SMSPlanstu wrote:Convert churches? The presbyterian in Laffayette Square, okay, but catholic churches?(


If I were Presbyterian, I would be offended by this remark. As an Episcopalian, I hope the Presbyterians won't mind if I am offended on their behalf. But, it is sad to see grand old churchs of any denomination abandoned. I would rather see them converted to upscale condos or fine restaurants than some other things I have seen. I hate it when you see church services being held in rundown storefronts and abandoned theaters, and the real church buildings used as taverns.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJun 13, 2005#4

Im not sure why its ok to use presbyterian churches and not catholic...opinions like this started the thirty years war in germany...

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJun 13, 2005#5

There buildings!! Just as long they are tastefully reused (Not turned into strip clubs warehouses ect.) and preserved it doesn't matter

197
Junior MemberJunior Member
197

PostJun 14, 2005#6

well, I think it's very distasteful to convert religious buildings (be they Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Islamic etc) that were built for that purpose to commercial or residential uses. Many buildings are just buildings, and it doesn't matter what they are used for. However, some buildings were designed to represent the aspirations, beliefs, or collective wills of a particular community and culture.



Many of those churches in St. Louis were built by immigrant communities (be they Irish, German, French, Italian, Croatian, Polish etc) who put a lot of hard earned money, work and effort to build something to honor their respective Gods and represent their communities. These buildings were often the symbolic as well as functional hearts of their communities (not only serving as a religious space but a community meeting point for social events such as parties and dinners).



I don't know what the solution is, since most of those communities dissolved long ago, or moved to the suburbs, but I don't think this is an appropriate reuse at all. It seems incredibly disrespectful and culturally harmful in my opinion...... For some it may just be a natural part of living in a post modern world, but i'd rather see these buildings torn down than reused in such a culturally insensitive way.



It's the equivalent of getting your family pet stuffed and using it as an oh so cute doorstop.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJun 14, 2005#7

Pass the bong.

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostJun 14, 2005#8

While all of you wax poetically about spiritual aspirations the reality is that I live directly across the street from St. Boniface and its fate affects me and my neighborhood. A church building is only brick and mortar, not the source of spirituality which comes from God thru the humans that inhabit a facility. My main concern is that whoever buys these buildings have the money to preserve them. A couple of weeks ago I ran into 2 older couples standing on my front walk looking at my home. When I inquired, it turned out that the women were sisters and had been the third generation of their family to grow up in my house (they lived there during the 40's and 50's). After a lengthy tour showing off our renovations and much reminiscing on their part, one of the husbands took me aside and said how much it meant to his wife that a good family had moved in and was lovingly caring for the house. In many ways that should also be the attitude we all take for old building reuse. Times and neighborhoods change and the most practical use for a structure may be radically different form its original inception. To me it is most important that the current caretaker of a building loves and respects it as much as those who have gone before.

As an aside......This is one of those hidden costs of urban sprawl that people refuse to see. How much money is spent by congregations in the suburbs building new sanctuaries while beautiful old building sit underutilized in the city, this is a true waste of resources.

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostJun 14, 2005#9

Southcitygent, you have summed up this subject perfectly. I hope these old buildings will be used well and maintained. I don't want to see any of them lost forever. If they turn into condos, at least people can walk by years from now and see where their ancestors, some of them immigrants, lived and worshipped. They worked hard to build these buildings. I can't speak for them, but I will wager they would prefer to have them saved and reused than torn down. By the way, I have seen a case where an old church was abandoned, resused for other purposes for decades, but maintained. Eventually, the neighborhood rebounded with new families and the original denomination reclaimed the building. I wish I could remember where it happened, I think in New England. St. Boniface is beautiful and if it is being sold, I am hoping good stewards will come along. My concern is with the Catholic church dumping so many at the same time, will it be possible for the market to absorb, especially in marginal neighborhoods?

197
Junior MemberJunior Member
197

PostJun 14, 2005#10

south gent, i wonder if that old couple would have been equally delighted if you had converted their old home into a nicely rehabbed convenience store as the most practical use for their structure. Sorry, i don't see any equivalence between rehabbing and taking care of a home, and turning an old church into a condo project (although I commend you for your work).



Anywho, I agree with most of what you guys are saying, but i'm not sure how you can so easily disregard the spiritual functions of a building, what that meant at a certain time in history, and using it for luxury condos. On the one hand, it is a great example of creative reuse and rehabbing (and as expat points out, someday they could be reclaimed...... highly doubtful IMO ((my reasoning is that if one day those areas are thriving enough to support a new parish/congregation that real estate will have one hell of a price tag, and i think it will be very hard for religious organizations to A) bring together the cash to even try to buy the place B) negotiate with all the condo owners to give up their posh and valuable residences C) have the additional cash to rehab the place))...............



i forgot what else i was going to say, but needless to say it comes down to opinion, and if the churches are willing to sell and someone's willing to buy there's not much else i can do than express my displeasure. I guess it's up to the respectice churches/denominations to determine what is the best reuse of their facilities, and if they say condo rehabs are a go then who am I to disagree. :D

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJun 14, 2005#11

I agree with you completely. If we weren't able to reuse old churches for other purposes, we wouldn't have the Grandel Theater, the 9th Street Abbey, etc. While I'd prefer that the churches be used as churches, adapting them for other uses is the next best thing.



It's amazing how churches are changing - from the churches we see in our neighborhoods to giant warehouses in flood plains.

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostJun 14, 2005#12

In Rolla they converted an old church into a summer stock theatre. I think they use the building for other arts, as well. It is a real asset to the entire community. Cedar Street Playhouse or Cedar Street Arts Center or something like that. Anyway, I can't see a downside in this case. If the building had been torn down or left to rot, it would not benefit anyone. In some of the old houses nearby, that had been used for rooming houses for decades, they have some antique shops, a coffee shop, and a really nice art gallery. I don't know much about the area, but I believe the theatre might have been a factor in discovering and reclaiming the historic neighborhood. If I were one of the original builders, I would be proud of what the building is giving to the community. Also, if some old couple came along, they may be delighted in seeing what has evolved in their old neighborhood after so many years of neglect. Their old house may be an art gallery and their old church a theatre, but the alternative could be far worse.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostJun 14, 2005#13

I was not trying to go off on the Presbyterians, my family was Presbyterian before the 70s and now we're Methodist. My ancestors came from Ireland so catholicism is in the history. I was refering to the prebyterian church structure on Missouri in Lafayette Square. It's relatively smaller than many churches in the City and is easier than most to chop up into expensive condos. I do not want churches becoming residences. What do you do with a cathedral ceiling? Catholic churches as we all know are adorned more. My church has mostly a large organ, two stained glass windows, and wooden interior compared to the extravagence lavished on catholic churches. Presbyterian churches are similar to Methodist in adornment. That is why I prefered catholic churches over that one presbyterian church.



Sell the churches to other denominations!

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostJun 14, 2005#14

If another church group came in and took the buildings over then that would be wonderful, but this is highly unlikely. First to those that treasure the religious nature of the ornamentation, the Catholic church has said that when the buildings are sold most of the religious items will be stripped. This includes stained glass windows, statues and alters, probably the organ as well. They use these items when constructing new churches, the one in Eureka recently installed old windows and statues during its recent expansion. Secondly, most of these building are in neighborhoods that are not conducive to church growth. Either the majority of new residents do not attend church or the people left have already committed to a congregation that has roots in the neighborhood. I have been involved in planting churches and city neighborhoods like Carondelet are considered to have limited potential for growth. A building like St. Boniface in my estimation needs a committed congregation of at least 350 people to cover the building costs. Remember most of these churches had groups of 100-250 a week and were still deemed underperforming. Lastly it is up to the city and neighborhood groups to make sure that the uses are appropriate, since many of these building are located in predominately residential districts then residential or institutional should be the best use. Just a reminder some other sanctuary reuse projects in St. Louis are...COCA, St. Louis Symphony Music School, Missouri Historical Society Archives, 9th Street Abby (Soulard) and the Temple condos in Shaw. (funny how all but one example was Jewish)

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJun 14, 2005#15

I wouldn't mind seeing Holy Family mothballed by the archdiocese. Its congregation was already strong, and as Tower Grove South keeps getting better and better, Holy Family's church and school could help draw families to the neighborhood.



Another good option would be to open a new school like the New City School in the CWE or Crossroads in DeBaliviere Place.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostSep 28, 2005#16

Second coming: St. Aloysius, Holy Innocents and St. Boniface being sold

Shawn Clubb

Of the Suburban Journals

South City Journal

09/28/2005



The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis is poised to sell three South Side churches less than three months after it closed them and redistributed parishioners.



Contracts for sale have been made for St. Aloysius Gonzaga, 5608 N. Magnolia Ave.; Holy Innocents, 4923 Odell St.; and St. Boniface, 7622 Michigan Ave. However, the fates of the three properties will be different.



The most striking change will come at St. Aloysius, where the church, school and other buildings will be demolished and replaced by single-family detached homes. Holy Innocents is being purchased to be used again as a church by a group called Journey Fellowship Inc., or The Journey. St. Boniface's rectory will be converted to apartments.



Father Vince Bommarito, the priest of St. Ambrose Parish, said there was a conscious decision to not have the buildings of St. Aloysius remain intact.



Read More

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostSep 28, 2005#17

I and everyone in the neighborhood that pays attention (surprisingly, not many) already knew about St. Als, but good news on the other sites too. The only thing that scares me is that the article only mentions brick fronts. Sounds like another Truman site.

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostSep 28, 2005#18

My main concern after reading this yesterday was Rothschild owning St. Boniface. His record of property ownership is pretty dismal. After all he was the landlord that ran the great building at Grand and Lindell into the ground, not to mention sitting on the Smile building in Soulard for an agonizingly long time.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostNov 02, 2005#19

Ad agency buys Holy Family Church

Jim Merkel

Of the Suburban Journals

South Side Journal

11/02/2005



Where families gathered for their weekly meetings with God, employees of an ad agency will craft their clients' pitches for more business.



The CFX advertising agency of Richmond Heights is buying the sanctuary, rectory and 15 parking spaces of the former Holy Family Catholic Church, 4125 Humphrey St., said Alderman Jennifer Florida, D-15th Ward. The church closed July 1 in a consolidation of South Side Catholic parishes.



Tom Richter, director of the Office of Building and Real Estate of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, said the ad agency has signed a sales contract to purchase the building. They hope to close on the building in mid-February.



"They are an ad agency relocating from St. Louis County and they've been looking for a creative space in which to have their agency," Richter said. "They're excited about having such a historically significant beautiful space," he said.



"It's our policy to try to find another religious group as a buyer but where we can't, we look for an appropriate adoptive reuse," Richter said.



The ad agency will be a positive addition to the neighborhood, Richter said.



The archdiocese is negotiating with a school group to buy the Holy Family School at 4130 Wyoming St., Richter said.



Florida said she met with the new owners last week.



Read More

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostNov 02, 2005#20

What no one is saying is why Holy Family and St. Aloysius Gonzaga couldn't find buyers in other churches. And it's because these churches were the key social institutions to surrounding residential blocks that are still largely Catholic.



However, unlike parishes serving or closer to St. Louis Hills, these Catholic families are more so working class (less able to afford the rising tuition of parochial schools) and older aging-in-place households (Catholic but having already raised their children).



The parishes near and along the Oak Hill-Carondelet UP rail line also are areas of transition. Their neighboring parishes to the west are still largely white and middle-class, while those to their east have become more ethnic parishes for Vietnamese and Hispanic families. Unfortunately, many of these now closed parishes about this fuzzy line between white Southwest City and diverse South Central City were just in the wrong place (less affluent) at the wrong time (their current snapshot of transition concurring with Burke's chopping block).



Since such critical social institutions to the forgotten Blue Ridge and Oak Hill communities, I'm sure many former parishioners would rather see the churches not become another church, if they're no longer able to congregate themselves there as a tightly knit community. St. Al's went so far as to welcome the demolition of the 100-plus year-old church, since apparently seeing their landmark occupied by "outsiders" would be too painful.



Luckily, St. Al's can be easily absorbed by nearby St. Ambrose, which ironically started in St. Al's. As such, Blue Ridge finally disappears completely to really just become part of The Hill.



But how the Oak Hill community will take the loss of their major social institution remains unknown. The newer generations of long-time Oak Hill families might easily cash in on the appreciation of their homes for the new gentry to replace them. And thus, Oak Hill too will now likely be lost to Tower Grove South.

36
New MemberNew Member
36

PostNov 02, 2005#21

Interesting tid bit about this company, CFX. This company was one that was displaced in Rock Hill, not Richmond Heights, for the Novus Development, Market at McKnight. They held out for quite a while, and came close to being bought through eminent domain. I don't believe that they were to blame completely, however, since I'd heard that they'd been given assurances from previous administrations in Rock Hill that they would not have to move. The space they owned was a former bank building on Manchester. I am still without opinion on this entire debate about eminent domain, to this point.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 02, 2005#22

^

Were they in the building with the drive-through lanes in front of it across from Nachomama's?

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostNov 03, 2005#23

The Market at McKnight is that strip mall that has the Hollywood Video, St. Louis Custard, a Clinic and an Ameghettis. It's on the SE corner of McKnight (Rock Hill Road) and Manchester.



If I'm not mistaken. It was built about 10 or so years ago.

36
New MemberNew Member
36

PostNov 04, 2005#24

Actually, that shopping center is called McKnight Crossing, built about 10 years ago. The Market at McKnight is the new shopping development across Rock Hill Road called the Market at McKnight (approx. $95MM). The developer is Novus (same as Sunset Hills). CFX has repeatedly said, including again today in the Webster-Kirkwood Times, that they tried to deal with Novus directly, but could not get a good-faith bid. But we digress off the topic, and for that matter even the area. For that I appologize. :oops:

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostNov 04, 2005#25

That's right, McKnight Crossing, my mistake.



So many stip malls, so many names, so little time.

Read more posts (2 remaining)