1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostMar 28, 2018#4426

ricke002 wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
If D were fully opened again, wouldn't flyers be able to use the T1 TSA check?
Someone else will know much more than I on this but:
From my understanding, Southwest likes having the Terminal mostly to themselves. I doubt Southwest would want to put a desk in T1. I guess carry-on passengers with online check-in could go to T1 TSA. Plus there's a certain amount of staffing unpredictability letting passengers choose which TSA checkpoint they go through. What other airports have 2 terminals feeding into one concourse?

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 28, 2018#4427

aprice wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
What other airports have 2 terminals feeding into one concourse?
STL did until the mid-2000's

1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostMar 28, 2018#4428

ricke002 wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
aprice wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
What other airports have 2 terminals feeding into one concourse?
STL did until the mid-2000's
That I did not know, that's good to know that it's a possibility then. I think it would alleviate some of T2's TSA and vehicular traffic issues. Especially when regular flyers start learning when it's best to use which terminal.

732
Senior MemberSenior Member
732

PostMar 28, 2018#4429

Now I have a headache with Concourse D information. Because I have heard, sourced secondarily, that Southwest and Lambert have ongoing discussions about a substantial increase in presence with the secondary markets like Jacksonville, Boise, Albuquerque, Birmingham, Buffalo, and some more international routes being considered.

I wonder if there exists a connection. I don't know.

3,960
Life MemberLife Member
3,960

PostMar 28, 2018#4430

aprice wrote:
Mar 28, 2018

Sorry for the naive question here, I hardly fly Southwest, much less fly at all. But can Terminal 2 TSA handle that much expansion? I realize they're already halfway there but I've heard T2 TSA can get bad at times. I know that T2 vehicular traffic is already a disaster at times.

Side note: I've only flown Southwest once, my plane landed in STL at 8:00 am on a Monday morning. It was crowded but in a good way. A great sight to see.
They are currently adding more lanes to the security in T2. Traffic, like you mention, is really bad at times. I don't see that changing. I don't really know what they could do. I guess if they reopen D then you could exit through the main terminal, which has less traffic. That said, a lot of the new passengers are connecting so that shouldn't add a bunch to the pickoff/dropoff.
aprice wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
ricke002 wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
If D were fully opened again, wouldn't flyers be able to use the T1 TSA check?
Someone else will know much more than I on this but:
From my understanding, Southwest likes having the Terminal mostly to themselves. I doubt Southwest would want to put a desk in T1. I guess carry-on passengers with online check-in could go to T1 TSA. Plus there's a certain amount of staffing unpredictability letting passengers choose which TSA checkpoint they go through. What other airports have 2 terminals feeding into one concourse?
I am curious about this as well. I guess it wouldn't matter which side they check in on (as long as they don't mind a really long walk to E4), but if they would do this, would they then use baggage claim in T1 for some flights and T2 for others? That would be really confusing. I don't think in the past when they had 2 terminals feeding C/D/E that any airlines had desks in both, it was one or the other. But I might be 100% off on this.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 28, 2018#4431

jshank83 wrote:
Mar 28, 2018


would they then use baggage claim in T1 for some flights and T2 for others? That would be really confusing.
Wouldn't we assume (after assuming the rest of D is opening rumor is true) that the currently closed off portion of D would reopen as D? Then, all flights that deplane at a D gate go to T1 and all that deplane at E gates to go T2, right? Doesn't seem overly confusing. Maybe just a demarcation line in the actual airport between E/D to show which way to get your bags. Have the flight attendants make an announcement before the doors open and then have signage at each baggage area. ORD is fully connected (T1-T3), yet have 3 separate baggage claim areas.

3,960
Life MemberLife Member
3,960

PostMar 28, 2018#4432

ricke002 wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
jshank83 wrote:
Mar 28, 2018


would they then use baggage claim in T1 for some flights and T2 for others? That would be really confusing.
Wouldn't we assume (after assuming the rest of D is opening rumor is true) that the currently closed off portion of D would reopen as D? Then, all flights that deplane at a D gate go to T1 and all that deplane at E gates to go T2, right? Doesn't seem overly confusing. Maybe just a demarcation line in the actual airport between E/D to show which way to get your bags. Have the flight attendants make an announcement before the doors open and then have signage at each baggage area. ORD is fully connected (T1-T3), yet have 3 separate baggage claim areas.
I would guess Southwest will want all their gates to be E gates. I would also guess having a E gate right next to a D gate when you are flying the same airline would be confusing since it isn't actually a different concourse. If you want to put another airline in D then start them from the C end and keep the D numbers for those and have them get their luggage in T1. If there is going to be a cutoff line I think it should be between airlines and not in the middle of the same airlines gates.

I haven't flown through ORD so I could be 100% off base here but I am guessing T1-3 are somewhat separate from each other by a walkway or something else and don't have some random line drawn after a gate midway down a concourse that says on this side it goes to one baggage claim and on the other side is another one. It also looks like they don't have different airlines across multiple terminals (except international) so all of one airline has the same luggage pickup area. United is in 1. American is in 3.

I am not saying you couldn't split baggage pickups but I still think you would have people going to the wrong spot and it would be confusing. That said, Oakland has the opposite issue which has Southwest in 2 terminals and all the baggage pick up for Southwest in one. I went to the wrong baggage pickup since I went to the baggage pickup for the terminal I was in and it was in the other terminal that was where most of the Southwest flights are located. Their terminals are also connected past security like C/D/E used to be.

1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostMar 28, 2018#4433

I too am not overly familiar with ORD but from looking at Google Earth, very small walkways connect the terminals and they really don't look like they're on the TSA secure side.
As for the walk from T1 to Gate E4, it would be 0.84 mile walk from the eastern edge or the T1 domes to Gate E4. Which might sound like a poorly laid out airport to some but sounds like bragging rights to me. Speaking of which, when are we getting our fancy clothing stores like European airports have? A Zara would kill it in T2.
After the mediocrity I've come to expect in this town, I just wouldn't be surprised if they turn all of D into E and don't even connect it to T1. But again, I really hope I'm wrong. Plus I'd love to see the T1 Domes getting some more love and attention.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostMar 29, 2018#4434

I believe the ORD terminal connections from T1-T3 are all airside, but T1 to T2 is a small corridor. T2 to T3 is a pretty impressive looking feature I mean to photograph the next time I'm there, as it's a rather classic piece of mid-century modernism. I've made a goodly number of connections at ORD, but I've never originated or terminated there, so I'm not sure how domestic baggage claim works. That said, United is in both T1 and T2. (O'Hare is very much their baby.) I'd guess they deal with baggage by sending it to the claim in whatever terminal you arrived at, since they're pretty obviously separate and they're at least signed to direct you to their own landisides. Southwest could do the same, but as jshank said . . . they might not. With the D concourse it's kind of arbitrary what terminal it belongs to anyway. (All a matter of the somewhat organic growth of the facility, I suppose.)

1,510
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,510

PostMar 30, 2018#4435

aprice wrote:
Mar 28, 2018
I too am not overly familiar with ORD but from looking at Google Earth, very small walkways connect the terminals and they really don't look like they're on the TSA secure side.
As for the walk from T1 to Gate E4, it would be 0.84 mile walk from the eastern edge or the T1 domes to Gate E4. Which might sound like a poorly laid out airport to some but sounds like bragging rights to me. Speaking of which, when are we getting our fancy clothing stores like European airports have? A Zara would kill it in T2.
After the mediocrity I've come to expect in this town, I just wouldn't be surprised if they turn all of D into E and don't even connect it to T1. But again, I really hope I'm wrong. Plus I'd love to see the T1 Domes getting some more love and attention.
I have done a sprint (hungover, in sandals) from E to C14 (ish) and that is a long friggin way (especially under the circumstances)

PostMar 30, 2018#4436

symphonicpoet wrote:
Mar 29, 2018
I believe the ORD terminal connections from T1-T3 are all airside, but T1 to T2 is a small corridor. T2 to T3 is a pretty impressive looking feature I mean to photograph the next time I'm there, as it's a rather classic piece of mid-century modernism. I've made a goodly number of connections at ORD, but I've never originated or terminated there, so I'm not sure how domestic baggage claim works. That said, United is in both T1 and T2. (O'Hare is very much their baby.) I'd guess they deal with baggage by sending it to the claim in whatever terminal you arrived at, since they're pretty obviously separate and they're at least signed to direct you to their own landisides. Southwest could do the same, but as jshank said . . . they might not. With the D concourse it's kind of arbitrary what terminal it belongs to anyway. (All a matter of the somewhat organic growth of the facility, I suppose.)
I think everyone is over thinking this. It can be done. It has been done.

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostMar 30, 2018#4437

^ Agree, it is truly as simple as opening up D again and telling people where their bags show.

What is disappointing in my mind is that no one in the region is asking what they want for an airport ten years from now, twenty years or several decades from now? or do you maintain the status quo/leftover configuration from TWA days and keep the undersized T2 baggage area w undersized drop off/pickup, limited short term parking and underwhelming metrolink stations as is?

I agree Lambert doesn't need a massive new terminal on the other side of the runways but the lack of a vision to reorganize the gates, right size and look at expanding short term parking & even a hotel is not encouraging for the long term. The luxury of having concourse D in that it gives a great option of being able to accommodate Southwest traffic growth in short term while pursuing a long term vision of how to consolidate gates, improve access from having A, B, C, D, E and T2 gates to maybe one linear concourse for T1 and rebuild part of T2 to provide more baggage space, expanded international presence if need be & better ingress/egress & more parking on the curb side.

3,960
Life MemberLife Member
3,960

PostMar 30, 2018#4438

Finished my Load Factor spreadsheet for full year 2017 Load Factors (Intl are only through September)

Percentages are for entire year and combined both ways. I have them broken down by direction/month in the spreadsheet. I did not include Intl routes in this post.

Top 10
Frontier Denver CO (DEN) 89.69%
Southwest Orlando FL (MCO) 89.30%
Southwest San Deigo CA (SAN) 88.76%
Allegaint (BLV) St Petersburg/Tampa FL (PIE) 88.19%
Southwest Milwaukee WI (MKE) 87.28%
Southwest Denver CO (DEN) 87.01%
United Denver CO (DEN) 86.79%
Southwest Portland OR (PDX) 86.49%
United Washington DC (IAD) 86.38%
Southwest San Francisco CA (SFO) 86.28%


Bottom 10
Delta Cincinnati OH (CVG) 59.13%
Southwest Minneapolis MN (MSP) 69.11%
Southwest Detroit MI (DTW) 71.70%
Southwest Tulsa OK (TUL) 71.82%
Allegiant (BLV) Fort Lauderdale FL (FLL) 72.14%
American Miami FL (MIA) 72.58%
Southwest Chicago IL (MDW) 72.63%
Southwest New Orleans LA (MSY) 73.23%
Southwest Kansas City MO (MCI) 73.36%
Southwest Dallas TX (DAL) 73.85%


6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostMar 31, 2018#4439

dredger wrote:
Mar 30, 2018
What is disappointing in my mind is that no one in the region is asking what they want for an airport ten years from now, twenty years or several decades from now? or do you maintain the status quo/leftover configuration from TWA days and keep the undersized T2 baggage area w undersized drop off/pickup, limited short term parking and underwhelming metrolink stations as is?

I agree Lambert doesn't need a massive new terminal on the other side of the runways but the lack of a vision to reorganize the gates, right size and look at expanding short term parking & even a hotel is not encouraging for the long term. The luxury of having concourse D in that it gives a great option of being able to accommodate Southwest traffic growth in short term while pursuing a long term vision of how to consolidate gates, improve access from having A, B, C, D, E and T2 gates to maybe one linear concourse for T1 and rebuild part of T2 to provide more baggage space, expanded international presence if need be & better ingress/egress & more parking on the curb side.
I think the problem might be that not all parties agree on where we should go. All of the problems that you describe seem to me to be side effects of Southwest being in a terminal that's too small for what they're doing now, but they reputedly don't want to move. I think the airport pretty much is right sized now. What with B mothballed in a very creative way and D sitting dormant, but maybe not for long.

"Right sizing," in this case, sounds like code for demo. And I don't think demo is a grand idea, since we could well have need for any space that could possibly be demolished profitably in the very near future. T1 is still a little quiet, but less all the time. Honsetly, I don't think what we need is "right sizing" but "right placing."

You could, perhaps, expand T2, but I don't see how you do it in a way that works better without demolishing it and starting over. The space is simply too tight as it stands. I just don't see how you sandwich anything more in there without moving it. And even if you demolish it and build new in that location any new would nullify half of what makes it good. You can't push it closer to the runway without causing the same complaints of pushback from the north side interfering with the taxiway that already plague C. You can't really move C much (if any) closer to D without making it one sided like E. Or doing away with D. Or both.

Right now, I really feel like the current configuration is quite adequate. It served TWA well enough as a primary hub. It would only work better now, with the extra runway. (The biggest problem was operational in bad weather. 11/29 solves that. Entirely. I watched just the other day, actually. It was really cool. They use the crap out of that runway in the rain.) I can't really see what Southwest actually needs that TWA didn't. However . . . Southwest isn't in TWA's airport. They're in Southwest's airport from when they were still small iconoclast upstart. I really think there's absolutely no way you'll ever make E an efficient hub. It just won't work. There isn't room over there. You could build a new terminal over between the end of 12R and 11. That's perhaps the only spot a modern terminal would fit. And that's precisely where they talked about building a new midfield terminal. They could still do that. But right now? Why spend the money. We can cross start to think about crossing that bridge when we can start to see its vague outline in the mists somewhere. For right now we have enough airport. It's well enough organized. It's well maintained. Maybe certain puzzle pieces need to be moved around a little. But the puzzle pieces do get a say in that. And sometimes they like it where they are.

But I've said this before.

3,960
Life MemberLife Member
3,960

PostApr 04, 2018#4440

Looks like WOW did a plane swap for the entire schedule now. They originally changed to the newer seat map plane when they added the extra flight from June onward but now they have changed it to the same plane for May also. The "Big Seat" option will be there for all flights now.

For comparison.

New seat map. 208 seats

http://wowair-web-files.s3.amazonaws.co ... %20CAT.pdf

Old. 200 seats

https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wowa ... ID_SON.pdf

EDIT: After looking closer (ie the first Monday flight) not all have changed. But some have.

692
Senior MemberSenior Member
692

PostApr 04, 2018#4441

Is WOW serving St. Louis in the winter, or is that TBA depending on how they do in the warmer months?

On their site, you can book flights from Chicago-Iceland for next winter, but that doesn't appear possible here (or the other smaller midwestern cities I checked). Our calendar only goes through October.

3,960
Life MemberLife Member
3,960

PostApr 04, 2018#4442

eee123 wrote:
Apr 04, 2018
Is WOW serving St. Louis in the winter, or is that TBA depending on how they do in the warmer months?

On their site, you can book flights from Chicago-Iceland for next winter, but that doesn't appear possible here (or the other smaller midwestern cities I checked). Our calendar only goes through October.
I am pretty sure it is supposed to be year round. Not sure on the frequencies in winter though.

PostApr 04, 2018#4443

Numbers for February are out.

Passengers
Up 3.9% on the month
Up 4.1% on the year

Cargo
Up 2.7% on the month
Up 3.7% on the year

https://www.flystl.com/uploads/document ... PubRel.pdf

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostApr 05, 2018#4444

The #1 thing that the airport could do to improve my satisfaction is improve the terminal parking situation. Whether that be raising the rates at T2 garage so that you could reasonably expect to get a spot when showing up for the mid morning bank of flights, or opening up concourse D so that I could park in T1s garage and walk. I'd much rather have a 5-10 minute walk over to T1 then wait and ride parking shuttles.

Also, any word about Wingtips joining Priority Pass? I have stuck my head in there from time to time and it doesn't appear to be very busy so I can't imagine they are currently profitable.

3,428
Life MemberLife Member
3,428

PostApr 05, 2018#4445

dabeags wrote:
Apr 05, 2018
The #1 thing that the airport could do to improve my satisfaction is improve the terminal parking situation. Whether that be raising the rates at T2 garage so that you could reasonably expect to get a spot when showing up for the mid morning bank of flights, or opening up concourse D so that I could park in T1s garage and walk. I'd much rather have a 5-10 minute walk over to T1 then wait and ride parking shuttles.

Also, any word about Wingtips joining Priority Pass? I have stuck my head in there from time to time and it doesn't appear to be very busy so I can't imagine they are currently profitable.
You are preaching to the choir. Why isn't the Airport Director aware of the short-term parking fiasco at Terminal 2? I would pay twice what they are asking if I could get a space. I've learned to take my wife with me if I want to meet someone at the exit from security. Last week I got to Terminal 2 arrivals around noon, and they closed the garage as usual because it was full. So I let my wife off so I could drive to the cell lot.

But imagine if your friend flies in from another city and you have pre-agreed to meet them at the exit from security. But if you are by yourself and the short term lot is full, your only real option is to go to the cell phone lot, and then try to call after they land to let them know why you aren't there. You tell them to go down and get their luggage and call again to have you come pick them up. Then they try to look into cars going by on the lower level drive to try to find which car is yours.

There is no way all those cars in short-term parking are people doing drop-off, pick-up, or day trips. They are likely business folks and others who happily pay the hourly rate for a week or more to park close. The airport could better serve its customers AND make a lot of money if they just raise the short term parking rate, or at least charge a fortune for 24-hour parking at that garage.

Here is a page from the current Airport Parking Site that I just grabbed. Odd that they send you to Lot A when Terminal 2 garage is full.
https://superparkinglot.com


They have a contact link at this url:
https://superparkinglot.com/contact

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostApr 05, 2018#4446

I'll fess up—I'm the guy you hate. :oops:

For business reasons, I constantly had a number of 6:30/7am flights out of T2. The TSA lines were consistently, ridiculously long. The shuttle from intermediate (D lot?) across from T1 is sporadic at best. You can (I know) waste 15-20 valuable minutes waiting for a shuttle to take you to T2. Couple that with waking up at 4/4:30am and I'm parking in the garage.

Double the price and I'm still parking in the garage.
I bet my last dollar the garage is full of 7:00am departures.

Solving the T2 parking issue requires also solving TSA and SuperPark shuttle service. I doubt higher prices is gonna be a deterrent.

985
Super MemberSuper Member
985

PostApr 05, 2018#4447

The T2 parking garage issue is something that is only going to get worse. Can imagine this will get much worse with WOW starting next month with international arrivals coming from there as well. Since you will have more people to pick up after clearing customs so making it with parking rates that slant towards short term parking is more necessary. They should really ramp up daily rates there because of this scenario.

474
Full MemberFull Member
474

PostApr 05, 2018#4448

gary kreie wrote:
Apr 05, 2018
But imagine if your friend flies in from another city and you have pre-agreed to meet them at the exit from security. But if you are by yourself and the short term lot is full, your only real option is to go to the cell phone lot, and then try to call after they land to let them know why you aren't there. You tell them to go down and get their luggage and call again to have you come pick them up. Then they try to look into cars going by on the lower level drive to try to find which car is yours.
Why not just tell them when you are making the arrangements, "Call me when you have picked up your bag and head to the far end of the pickup area. I will be there in a couple of minutes." That's what the cell phone lot is for. Why would you even try to meet them inside the airport?

3,428
Life MemberLife Member
3,428

PostApr 05, 2018#4449

Black02AltimaSE wrote:
gary kreie wrote:
Apr 05, 2018
But imagine if your friend flies in from another city and you have pre-agreed to meet them at the exit from security. But if you are by yourself and the short term lot is full, your only real option is to go to the cell phone lot, and then try to call after they land to let them know why you aren't there. You tell them to go down and get their luggage and call again to have you come pick them up. Then they try to look into cars going by on the lower level drive to try to find which car is yours.
Why not just tell them when you are making the arrangements, "Call me when you have picked up your bag and head to the far end of the pickup area. I will be there in a couple of minutes." That's what the cell phone lot is for. Why would you even try to meet them inside the airport?
That’s a pretty cold welcome for, say, your new in-laws on their first trip to St Louis. So you would say get rid of all short term parking since it is not needed for pickup or drop off, and it certainly is not intended for overnight parking. How about this — tow cars away that have been there over 3 hours. They are not there for arriving or departing passenger rendezvous. So why are they there?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

474
Full MemberFull Member
474

PostApr 05, 2018#4450

gary kreie wrote:
Apr 05, 2018
Black02AltimaSE wrote:
gary kreie wrote:
Apr 05, 2018
But imagine if your friend flies in from another city and you have pre-agreed to meet them at the exit from security. But if you are by yourself and the short term lot is full, your only real option is to go to the cell phone lot, and then try to call after they land to let them know why you aren't there. You tell them to go down and get their luggage and call again to have you come pick them up. Then they try to look into cars going by on the lower level drive to try to find which car is yours.
Why not just tell them when you are making the arrangements, "Call me when you have picked up your bag and head to the far end of the pickup area. I will be there in a couple of minutes." That's what the cell phone lot is for. Why would you even try to meet them inside the airport?
That’s a pretty cold welcome for, say, your new in-laws on their first trip to St Louis. So you would say get rid of all short term parking since it is not needed for pickup or drop off, and it certainly is not intended for overnight parking. How about this — tow cars away that have been there over 3 hours. They are not there for arriving or departing passenger rendezvous. So why are they there?
Whoa, relax a bit. Your first example was "your friend flies in from another city" and now it's "your new in-laws on their first trip to St. Louis." All I was saying was, your scenario could be dealt with very simply. One phone call and about 5 minutes spent waiting by your friend from out of town. There are situations where short term parking is preferable and/or necessary. Picking up my old college roommate would not be one of them and, if I were to use a spot for that purpose, I would be contributing to the problem.

Read more posts (5253 remaining)