Tapatalk

Bhutanese refugees make St. Louis home

Bhutanese refugees make St. Louis home

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostApr 21, 2008#1

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument


The first group, arriving throughout the week, includes 121 refugees. They are being sent to New York; Chicago, Illinois; Syracuse, New York; St. Louis, Missouri; and other cities, the International Organization for Migration said.
http://www2.iteams.org/~albinst/1934/?p=352

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostApr 22, 2008#2

St. Louis should take them ALL! can we increase the number of immigrants to St. Louis? Is it always some "set" number?

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 22, 2008#3

^I agree. Unfortunately, it seems to be moving in the opposite direction. Note that between 1998 and 2001, the International Institute sponsored 5300 refugees in St. Louis. From 2002 to 2007, the number fell to 1500 (that's just the International Institute. I don't know the overall numbers).

3,556
Life MemberLife Member
3,556

PostApr 22, 2008#4

Who controls how many refugees we can take? We took a very large number of Bosnians and look what they have done for the community. I think one of the biggest things St. Louis needs is more diversity! When I lived in South Florida for a few years, the diversity was what I liked the most about the area and it definitely made things less racially polarizing. It forced you to work with people that were not "just like you" and I think thats definitely a good thing. When your always around people that think, look, and feel like you....it breeds ignorance! and sometimes I feel like thats what St. Louis suffers from, its way to polarizing here and it creates a me vs. you mentality. Think about it, some of the coolest and most successful places in the region are the most diverse. Think of the Delmar Loop for example.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 22, 2008#5

goat314 wrote:Who controls how many refugees we can take? We took a very large number of Bosnians and look what they have done for the community. I think one of the biggest things St. Louis needs is more diversity! When I lived in South Florida for a few years, the diversity was what I liked the most about the area and it definitely made things less racially polarizing. It forced you to work with people that were not "just like you" and I think thats definitely a good thing. When your always around people that think, look, and feel like you....it breeds ignorance! and sometimes I feel like thats what St. Louis suffers from. Think about it, some of the coolest and most successful places in the region are the most diverse. Think of the Delmar Loop for example.


Isn't the Loop nothing more than spoiled rich Wash U Kids, local hippies and posers?



Sounds pretty homogenous to me

2,433
Life MemberLife Member
2,433

PostApr 22, 2008#6

migueltejada wrote:
goat314 wrote:Who controls how many refugees we can take? We took a very large number of Bosnians and look what they have done for the community. I think one of the biggest things St. Louis needs is more diversity! When I lived in South Florida for a few years, the diversity was what I liked the most about the area and it definitely made things less racially polarizing. It forced you to work with people that were not "just like you" and I think thats definitely a good thing. When your always around people that think, look, and feel like you....it breeds ignorance! and sometimes I feel like thats what St. Louis suffers from. Think about it, some of the coolest and most successful places in the region are the most diverse. Think of the Delmar Loop for example.


Isn't the Loop nothing more than spoiled rich Wash U Kids, local hippies and posers?



Sounds pretty homogenous to me


That is such a stupid misconception. I walked the entire stretch of Delmar last weekend and it was not only the most vibrant pedestrian district in STL (easily), but it was amazingly diverse wth cultures, races, ages and lifestyles. You obviously haven't spent much time out of your car on Delmar lately. It's one of the few commercial districts that actually works (now when the hell are we going to get a real supermarket).

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 22, 2008#7

migueltejada wrote:
goat314 wrote:Who controls how many refugees we can take? We took a very large number of Bosnians and look what they have done for the community. I think one of the biggest things St. Louis needs is more diversity! When I lived in South Florida for a few years, the diversity was what I liked the most about the area and it definitely made things less racially polarizing. It forced you to work with people that were not "just like you" and I think thats definitely a good thing. When your always around people that think, look, and feel like you....it breeds ignorance! and sometimes I feel like thats what St. Louis suffers from. Think about it, some of the coolest and most successful places in the region are the most diverse. Think of the Delmar Loop for example.


Isn't the Loop nothing more than spoiled rich Wash U Kids, local hippies and posers?
For Miguel, I'll pull a CS and simply say, "No."



The State Department manages the influx of refugees via the Refugee Act of 1980. It seems they partner with local organizations such as the International Institute in St. Louis.



Some people seem to clamor for more and more refugees but I found it interesting that the article notes that "officials estimate refugees make up 8 to 10 percent of the city's population of 350,000." Pretty sizable I'd think although I can't say that more or less would be better.



The life of a refugee is not easy. I know this first-hand. My biological parents were Jewish refugees escaping Russian persecution and arrived in Chicago while I was still in the womb. The transition initially fared too difficult for them. I heard stories that he put out a lit cigar on me while I was a baby. Her husband later abandoned both she and I. She struggled, became severely distraught and chose to give me up for adoption when I was about 3 months old.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostApr 22, 2008#8

innov8ion wrote:
migueltejada wrote:
goat314 wrote:Who controls how many refugees we can take? We took a very large number of Bosnians and look what they have done for the community. I think one of the biggest things St. Louis needs is more diversity! When I lived in South Florida for a few years, the diversity was what I liked the most about the area and it definitely made things less racially polarizing. It forced you to work with people that were not "just like you" and I think thats definitely a good thing. When your always around people that think, look, and feel like you....it breeds ignorance! and sometimes I feel like thats what St. Louis suffers from. Think about it, some of the coolest and most successful places in the region are the most diverse. Think of the Delmar Loop for example.


Isn't the Loop nothing more than spoiled rich Wash U Kids, local hippies and posers?
For Miguel, I'll pull a CS and simply say, "No."


I might have said "yes". :)

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostApr 22, 2008#9

migueltejada wrote:
goat314 wrote:Who controls how many refugees we can take? We took a very large number of Bosnians and look what they have done for the community. I think one of the biggest things St. Louis needs is more diversity! When I lived in South Florida for a few years, the diversity was what I liked the most about the area and it definitely made things less racially polarizing. It forced you to work with people that were not "just like you" and I think thats definitely a good thing. When your always around people that think, look, and feel like you....it breeds ignorance! and sometimes I feel like thats what St. Louis suffers from. Think about it, some of the coolest and most successful places in the region are the most diverse. Think of the Delmar Loop for example.


Isn't the Loop nothing more than spoiled rich Wash U Kids, local hippies and posers?



Sounds pretty homogenous to me


Yep, and the Landing is for hoosiers, the Arch is for tourists, etc, etc.



I love that I will be a St Louis city resident in about 6 days, and I am now unable to do anything because I don't want to get labeled.

3,556
Life MemberLife Member
3,556

PostApr 22, 2008#10

^ Yeah Juice, his comment was a perfect example of how polarization breeds ignorance, he also said that U-City was lilly white in another thread. I'm pretty sure there is at least as many Blacks as Whites in U-City if not more.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 22, 2008#11

goat314 wrote:^ Yeah Juice, his comment was a perfect example of how polarization breeds ignorance, he also said that U-City was lilly white in another thread. I'm pretty sure there is at least as many Blacks as Whites in U-City if not more.


Sure - north of Delmar. South? You wish. Everything between Delmar and the FPP is whitebread country, with a few students and the occasional minority mixed in for good measure.



Yeah, I guess I forgot to include the 5 people who either frequent the church's chicken or beg for money. And the families who take their kids to Fitzs on weekends. How could I have forgotten them? :roll:



Ignorance? Oh please Goat. Get out of the classroom and look around for once. If anything is more insular and self-masturbatory, it's academia. Hell, most of the planning problems are CAUSED by academics who think their new theory is the answer.



And by the by - I used to love the loop, back when no one else did (hippies and homeless and all). I was going there to buy baseball cards and comics from Front Page News with my friend when I was like 10 years old. Now? Hyper trendy super garbage. But gosh it's got the Pageant and Pin Up Bowl! :roll:

205
Junior MemberJunior Member
205

PostApr 23, 2008#12

So what St. Louis community do you love now?

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 23, 2008#13

brody wrote:So what St. Louis community do you love now?


People are gonna roll their eyes, but I love Ladue, mostly the stretch of retail along Clayton Road from Warson to the the Jr High. It's one of the few remaining areas of unique shopping and mid-century suburban character left. Yeah, the prices are beyond most people's budgets (including mine), but it's a walkable (if autocentric), quaint, and overall nice places to be.



Other places on my list are Downtown Kirkwood & Webster Groves, though both are starting to go the way of the Loop (overpopular chain-ified), and Dogtown.



Downtown Alton is really cool too the one time I was there. Now that's a place that should be far far busier than it actually is

835
Super MemberSuper Member
835

PostApr 23, 2008#14

miguel-- I am 90% sure you aren't really as ignorant as you sound.

205
Junior MemberJunior Member
205

PostApr 23, 2008#15

I can't speak for Webster, but I see downtown Kirkwood as equally chain-ified and much less ethnically diverse than the Loop. You would be seriously hard pressed to find a person of color in downtown Kirkwood. I also like the variety of stores on the loop. Books, clothing, music, jewelry, art, food; whatever you need, you can find there. Kirkwood's a bit more one-dimensional in that much of the retail is food-based.



Not to diss Kirkwood's downtown; it's has some fine establishments and I definitely agree that the Loop has become a bit too trendy. Then again, that's to be expected of a semi-college town.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 23, 2008#16

migueltejada wrote:
People are gonna roll their eyes, but I love Ladue


:roll:

542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostApr 23, 2008#17

How did a thread about folks from Bhutan get turned into an argument about the Loop?



Oh yes, MiguelTejada, the guy who thinks you're racist if you don't like the NBA.

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostApr 23, 2008#18

Hey, a new page! Sounds like a good time to go back to the topic!

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostApr 23, 2008#19

throatybeard wrote:Oh yes, MiguelTejada, the guy who thinks you're racist if you don't like the NBA.


Don't forget, you are a racist if you like baseball, too.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 23, 2008#20

throatybeard wrote:How did a thread about folks from Bhutan get turned into an argument about the Loop?



Oh yes, MiguelTejada, the guy who thinks you're racist if you don't like the NBA.


I never said that. I said you were racist because you didn't want an NBA TEAM in St. Louis, with your only explanation being you didn't like the NBA game. Whether or not my logic is wrong, you sir or madam, are a total fool if you'd willingly turn away a professional sports franchise and all the money, jobs and potential prestige it would bring, solely because you don't like the game they play. I'm not a soccer fan, but would hardly begrudge stl an MLS team. Would you?



Now back on topic, I'm in favor of refugees as long as they make good food and don't create more problems than they'll solve. ATM, everything is going smoothly. I wish them the best.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostApr 24, 2008#21

And by the by - I used to love the loop, back when no one else did (hippies and homeless and all). I was going there to buy baseball cards and comics from Front Page News with my friend when I was like 10 years old. Now? Hyper trendy super garbage. But gosh it's got the Pageant and Pin Up Bowl!


oh yea, I'm SURE you were in the Loop back in the "good ol days"...what are you, 18-22? So, you were Beaver Cleaver on your little red Schwinn, sporting your little baseball cap, with new comics from Front Page in your bike basket... :lol:



Comparing the Loop to Ladue is like comparing Greenwich Village to Greenwich Connecticut. give me a break. BOTH are assets to the region, but comparing the two is ridiculous. and really, do you show out of towners the STRIP in Ladue?! HAHAHA best thing i've heard on this thread yet. don't get me wrong, I'm a huge sportsman's park fan, but come on dude.

155
Junior MemberJunior Member
155

PostApr 24, 2008#22

migueltejada wrote:I said you were racist because you didn't want an NBA TEAM in St. Louis, with your only explanation being you didn't like the NBA game. Whether or not my logic is wrong, you sir or madam, are a total fool if you'd willingly turn away a professional sports franchise and all the money, jobs and potential prestige it would bring, solely because you don't like the game they play.


But...how is that racist...?



And how is Ladue more diverse than U. City...?



Oh, wait - you're just a troll who will spout anything to get on people's nerves! OK, makes sense now. Never mind.

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostApr 24, 2008#23

Please get back on topic.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostApr 24, 2008#24

Xing, I tried, but since no one wants to listen...



Found the old post throaty - I accused you of being racist because you said STL and Pittsburgh (two of the whitest major cities in the US) for being the best sports town for not having an NBA team. I still stand by my point that not wanting an NBA team cause you don't like the NBA is totally, incredibly, farcically self-centered. Prove me wrong.



J - My age is irrelevant (though I am certainly older than the age range you put up there). Fact of the matter is that the Loop was (and still is to a consistently decreasing degree) an edgy but fun place. Now it's got upper class baby and furniture stores a few blocks down from tattoo parlors, not to mention a bowling alley bar that serves martinis. I'm saying the culture of the area is changing - and changing faster than people want to admit. Star Clipper is a great example (and I like the store) - but it's a clean, fancyish comic book store. WHO KEEPS A FANCYISH COMIC BOOK STORE?



I also never compared the strip in Ladue to the Loop Jason, so get your facts straight before you get stupid. And yes, I would take out of towners there if they asked me for a place with a unique shopping offer. Just depends on their budget! :lol:

3,556
Life MemberLife Member
3,556

PostApr 25, 2008#25

^ Not to burst your bubble but St. Louis is definitely not one of the whitest major cities in the US. Ever been to Seattle, Boston, Portland, Minneapolis, Salt Lake City, Cincinnati, Buffalo, Pittsburgh and a slew of other cities that are considerably whiter than metro St. Louis. Metro St. Louis is at least 20-25% Black (but I guess that doesn't count unless they are on a sports team right?) and the region as a whole is getting increasingly diverse due to our low cost of living and slower pace of life, which is attractive to many new immigrant groups like the Bhutanese. Get your facts together before you start spewing your baseless opinions. Just because your passionate about Ladue (the epitome of anti-diverse, racially polarized, suburban sprawl), doesn't mean the rest of us live in a St. Louis without diversity.

.....Anyway I would love to see more of this going on, does anybody know what other refugee groups we could see in the future? Maybe if China beats up enough of those Tibetan monks we could see some Buddhist refugees in the future :lol:.

Read more posts (10 remaining)