Tapatalk

Columbia: TIF for Tiger Hotel and New Development

Columbia: TIF for Tiger Hotel and New Development

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostJun 04, 2009#1

"TIF public hearing set tomorrow night



Wednesday, June 3, 2009



Advertisement



The Tax Increment Finance Commission will hold its first public hearing tomorrow to gather public comment on the projects of two developers who are seeking public funds for their downtown buildings. The 6 p.m. meeting will be held in the mezzanine conference room of the Daniel Boone Building, 701 E. Broadway.



If the Columbia City Council approves, the developers will be able to keep some of the property tax and sales tax revenue generated by their projects to offset the cost of development. The developers with pending applications — the first TIF projects in city history — are John Ott and partners, who plan to remodel the Tiger Hotel, and Trittenbach Development, which would create a mixed-use retail, office and apartment complex at Tenth and Locust streets.



The TIF Commission eventually will make a recommendation to the city council, which has the final say.



More information is available at gocolumbiamo.com/Council, then scrolling down to Boards and Commissions and finding the link to Tax Increment Finance Commission. "



http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/200 ... row-night/

PostJun 04, 2009#2

Here is an article that explains more of what they want to do.



http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stori ... tax-break/



Some clips from the article



"By June 2010, three Columbia developers would like The Tiger Hotel to be known for more than just the glowing neon sign perched 10 stories above Eighth Street. They want The Tiger to become a downtown destination. But they say it won't happen without a $1.7 million tax break.



The Tiger's owners — John Ott, Dave Baugher and Al Germond — propose a $4.4 million renovation of the mostly vacant building that would convert it into a 62- to 69-room boutique hotel. The project, they argue, deserves public investment because it will act as a downtown focal point, bringing more people to The District and boosting business there."



"Development Dynamics looked over The Tiger for the owners. Its report says that the building lacks modern basic utilities and that its foundation, floors, wiring and walls are deteriorating. Photographs in the report show exposed wiring and utility pipes and water damage to a ceiling in one of its rooms.



Ott said the rooms have been "mothballed" since they shut down a senior-living business in January 2007, and that they would need significant work that's too expensive for developers to do on their own.



"The exterior of the structure ... has undergone renovation work and is in sound condition," the analysis stated. "On the interior, nine of the ten floors will require extensive renovation in order to accommodate the needs of a modern hotel, from life safety improvements to complete demolition of existing partitions and fixtures."



The Tiger got a $4.5 million facelift before it opened for senior-assisted living. But "due to several factors, the project was unsuccessful in sustaining long-term use of The Tiger Hotel," the application's cover letter stated.



Ott said a lack of kitchens in rooms helped doom that effort.



"The senior population likes to have kitchen facilities," he said. "They are very independent, and our building didn't provide for that."



The developers expect future success with a boutique hotel. Ott said he sees The Tiger as a "destination" that would attract tourists interested solely in staying at the 1920s-era building. Each of the guest rooms would be highly stylized to fit the historical architecture.



It's too early to know exactly what each room would look like, Ott said, but he wants The Tiger to have character.



In the TIF application, the owners estimate the cost of the overall project — including the work already done — will hit $9 million. The developers have invested $4.5 million already and would need "every penny" of another $4.4 million to finish, Van Matre said. About 40 percent of the additional $4.4 million would come from TIF, while the rest would come from the owners, other investors and bank loans."















According to Wikipedia it was built in 1928 and placed on the national register of historic places in 1980.

PostJun 04, 2009#3

Here is a little bit on the proposed new development at 10th and locust.



"Nathan and John Odle of Trittenbach Development are proposing a $17.1-million building that will include eight stories of retail, office and residential space for the northeast corner of Tenth and Locust streets.



They say the project meets the blighted area requirement, citing "unsanitary and unsafe conditions" for the three apartment houses that are on the property now.



Their application also states the project will need at least 100 people on site each day during construction and eventually will create at least 25 permanent jobs, which is a substantial public benefit, according to the application.



The Odle brothers also anticipate their project to be a catalyst for other high-quality development downtown.



To satisfy the "but-for test," Trittenbach spokesman Brad Wright said the Odles could never have considered such an undertaking until the city passed the tax-increment financing ordinance."



http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stori ... financing/

PostJun 04, 2009#4

Odle brothers aim to build eight-story development in downtown Columbia



"COLUMBIA — A young entrepreneur walks a few blocks from his downtown office, picks up a few things for dinner at a grocery store and then takes the elevator seven floors above the store to his two-bedroom apartment.



A recently retired couple grabs an early bite to eat in a restaurant in the same building where they rent their home. After supper, they make their way to the building's roof to go for a short swim.



That's how local developers Nathan and Jonathan Odle imagine their proposed development at the northeast corner of Tenth and Locust streets in late 2010. Right now, the property is home to three buildings and a 24-spot parking lot.



The Odles, of Columbia, want to replace them with an eight-story structure that would rival The Tiger Hotel in height. It would feature a grocery store, restaurant and rooftop swimming pool; five floors of apartments that would rent for about $1,200 per month; 11 indoor parking spots and 15,000 square feet of office space.



But the Odles say they need a $3.2 million tax break over 23 years to accomplish their dream. Last week, the Odles operating as Trittenbach Development submitted an application for tax-increment financing for the $17.1-million project.



Trittenbach owns three of the four parcels it needs for the project. The other parcel, the surface parking lot, is owned by the city. Trittenbach has been negotiating since October to buy the property from the city.



Although Trittenbach is asking for 19 percent of its project to be paid for through tax-increment financing, its approach is radically different.



Normally, a lump sum of money — a portion of the difference between the owners' property taxes before and after development — is invested into the project from the get-go.



Trittenbach, however, has proposed a "pay-as-you-go" plan. It would pay its property taxes every year, but a portion of those taxes would be reinvested back into the project each year. That means the lump sum that's normally paid at the beginning of a project would instead be doled out over 23 years.



"This way makes it more fair for everyone," said Brad Wright, the project's architect and spokesman. Wright said the public investment would come from the site's actual property taxes, rather than a projected estimate.



"There's no risk for the city," he said.



Assistant City Manager Tony St. Romaine agreed that pay-as-you-go tax-increment financing absolves the city from any credit risk.



For a project to qualify for tax-increment financing, it must satisfy three requirements: It must be in an area designated as blighted or as an area in need of conservation; the project must not be financially feasible without public investment; and it must create a substantial benefit for the community.



The application Trittenbach submitted to the city included a report conducted by Development Strategies that argued the four parcels of land should be considered blighted.



There's no question the property is deteriorating. Tree roots and ivy, browned and frostbitten from winter, have crept up through wide cracks in a narrow sidewalk leading to a concrete staircase in front of one of the apartment houses. The edges of the stairs have crumbled away and so has the curb separating the property from the street.



The apartment houses do have tenants, but the structures are more than 100 years old.



"The Tenth Street and Locust Street Redevelopment Area suffers from a variety of physical and economic deficiencies including unsanitary and unsafe conditions and deteriorating and inadequate site improvements, which contribute to the area's position today as an economic or social liability to the City of Columbia," the application stated.



Wright said this project wouldn't have been possible until tax-increment financing came along as an option.



"Even with TIF, it will be a long time down the road before the project will realize a profit," he said.



Finally, to meet the third requirement, the applicants said their development would create jobs. About 100 people would be on site every day during construction and, once built, the development would create at least 25 permanent jobs.



It will also bring more than 100 more residents downtown and spur other high-quality projects, the application stated.



Trittenbach would like to see a health-conscious, high-quality grocery store — modeled after a Whole Foods or Trader Joe's but better suited to Columbia's market size — use some of the commercial space.



The application goes to the city's Tax Increment Financing Commission, which will recommend whether the Columbia City Council approve or reject it."



http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stori ... plication/

PostJun 04, 2009#5

Tenth and Locust TIF Proposal with artist rendering.



http://www.gocolumbiamo.com/Council/Com ... tation.pdf

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJun 04, 2009#6

Good - I like to see an emphasis on downtown Columbia instead of its boring, outer areas.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJun 04, 2009#7

Hopefully the Tiger Hotel and Tenth and Locust plans can both move forward.



IMHO these projects would be icing on the cake that is downtown Columbia- oops- I mean 'The District'. Columbia is fortunate to have a vibrant downtown that never really experienced the type of decline that cities of similar size have witnessed in their central business districts over the last 40 years.



At the risk of raising a few eyebrows, I'll say what I've said before here: I think Columbia has perhaps the most inviting, interesting, and vibrant downtown in Missouri. Of course it cannot compare in terms of size or amenities to larger downtown areas like St. Louis, Kansas City, or even Springfield (at least in terms of size), but all three of those cities have relatively large downtowns in terms of area, they have all experienced decline at some point, and they all still have dead zones despite significant revitalization efforts in the last decade.



Columbia's downtown has always had a fair amount of businesses and restaurants along with vibrancy thanks to MU and the other college campuses in town, but in recent years, aesthetic improvements have made it even better. Hopefully Columbia leaders will recognize the Tiger Hotel and Tenth and Locust projects as vital tools to take downtown development to the next phase and to secure its status as a regional destination in its own right.



Columbia's outer areas are no more distinct than those of any other city, but I do like how retail is mostly concentrated in three clusters: Stadium Boulevard between West Broadway and I-70 (Columbia Mall, Macy's, and the Shoppes at Stadium Plaza), East Broadway and US 63, and Grindstone Parkway at Providence Road. Other than the I-70 business loop, and perhaps the northern half of Providence Road, I can't think of a street that has long stretches of fast food joints, gas stations, banks, car dealers, etc. outside of the three primary retail clusters beyond downtown. (So with this in mind, and downtown's current strength as a draw for the region, I'm in favor of these developments and any others that will continue to make downtown/The District the focal point of the Columbia area.)

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 05, 2009#8

Ugh. No windows in the living rooms (Tenth and Locust).

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJun 05, 2009#9

Framer wrote:Ugh. No windows in the living rooms (Tenth and Locust).


That is a bit odd, isn't it? It looks like the two bedrooms feature windows and balconies, and from what I could see, it also looks like the floorplans are exactly the same for each place.



Not a bad looking development, and I'm still in favor of it as a better and higher use of the land by all means, but I would've liked to have seen some more thought put into the living spaces. Perhaps one of the bedrooms could have still opened to the balcony, but wouldn't people really want to appreciate the views from their living rooms as well? :roll:

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostJun 10, 2009#10

Well it looks like both proposals passed.



"Panel narrowly OKs TIF recommendations



Tuesday, June 9, 2009



Advertisement



The commission on tax-increment financing voted Tuesday afternoon in favor of the allocation of tax money for two downtown development projects.



The vote means the panel will recommend to the Columbia City Council that the projects — the redevelopment of the Tiger Hotel and a retail, office and residential building at Tenth and Locust streets — be allowed to proceed with plans that would use any increases in revenue from property and sales taxes at their developments to help finance the projects.



Both projects narrowly passed in votes by the panel’s 10 members. The Tiger Hotel project TIF was recommended on a 5-4 vote, with Teresa Maledy abstaining. The Tenth and Locust project recommendation was passed 6-4.



In passing the recommendations, the TIF commission pointed out some factors for city council members to consider. Those included the possibility of shortening the amount of time during which the developers can collect the taxes or allowing taxing entities such as the school district or the library to get a portion of the TIF money."



http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/200 ... ions/?news