Tapatalk

Funding for "The New I-64" reaches halfway mark!

Funding for "The New I-64" reaches halfway mark!

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMay 05, 2005#1

The project is expected to cost between $500-$600-million.





click



Hampton Avenue moves up on Hwy. 40 priority list

By Phil Sutin

Of the Post-Dispatch

05/02/2005




Hampton interchange

moves up on list




State highway officials have added the reconstruction of the Hampton Avenue interchange to the first phase of rebuilding Highway 40 from Spoede Road to west of Sarah Street.



The first phase now has three projects. In addition to the Hampton interchange, the others are rebuilding the expressway's interchange at Interstate 170 and related interchanges at Hanley Road and Brentwood Boulevard; and the reconstruction of the interchange at Kingshighway and related work east of it.



All these projects could begin in 2007, Lesley Solinger Hoffarth, project manager, said last week. She discussed the highway plans at a work session of Clayton aldermen and in a later interview.



Solinger Hoffarth said the schedule and financing for the Highway 40 project would change somewhat as engineers worked out more details.



The project "is still a concept," she said. "There is a lot of design work to do."



The state has amassed $309 million for the work:



$44 million in state and federal highway funds for the Kingshighway interchange.



$265 million in state money for interchanges at Hampton and the I-170 area from the money officials expect to obtain from a shift of about $187 million a year in motor vehicle and gas taxes to highways and bridges by 2009.




At Hampton Avenue, the state would build a single-point interchange with Hampton on top of the highway, as it is now. North of Highway 40, a roundabout would handle turns from various drives in Forest Park. A multipurpose path would go under the roadway. Hampton and Oakland Avenue would remain an intersection.



To read more go to:

Hampton Avenue moves up on Hwy. 40 priority list



Link:

The New I-64 (Some really cool interactive aerials)

101
Junior MemberJunior Member
101

PostMay 06, 2005#2

Im almost always excited about new transportation improvements, but I have mixed feelings about this. First of all, highway 40 is not that bad compared to other cities' highways. Other than rush hour, its an easy drive. Second, it has character that other city highways don't have... being so old. But most important, why should we reward people for moving out of the city by giving them a brand new highway straight to Wentzville. If they want to live in wildwood and work downtown, they should have to suffer. We have plenty of street improvments accross the area the money could be used for, as well as metrolink expansion.

6,663
AdministratorAdministrator
6,663

PostMay 06, 2005#3

While I wish it would go for Metrolink, it's highway money, so that would only happen when pigs fly. I regards to the highway, I think it does have character, but the new design for once has character too. And I have always been afraid one of those crumbling bridges is going to fall on me. We have to live in reality, and realize that many of those people are not coming back, and this may help them come in even more. I can't wait for Hampton and Kingshighway to be rebuilt. Those intersections suck. If we only had tax sources for mass transit like for roads....

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMay 06, 2005#4

An additional through lane in each direction will only be added west of I-170, matching current lane capacity west of Spoede. But in this first phase of rebuilding 40, the target project areas will be immediately about I-170 from Brentwood to Hanley, the interchange at Hampton, and from Kingshighway east to Sarah. Thus, no lane adding in the first phase. Still, phase-one construction will be a mess, where congestion is already the worst, about I-170 between Brentwood and Hanley.



Fortunately, MetroLink and Forest Parkway will easily open (projected late 2006) prior to Highway 40 reconstruction starting in 2007 at the very earliest. Of course, it now appears that the Cross-County line is set to open initially without a parking garage at the Brentwood/I-64 station. Looks like County voters will have to approve Prop M if they want to use Metro's defacto transit detour.