Tapatalk

How much does Missouri put in for St Louis transit?

How much does Missouri put in for St Louis transit?

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostFeb 02, 2006#1

I have the answer, but first, other cities.







The answer







That's right, 1 %.

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostFeb 02, 2006#2

Very sad indeed...What year are those budgets?

6,663
AdministratorAdministrator
6,663

PostFeb 02, 2006#3

That's very sad, but pretty much what I expected. :twisted: :evil:

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostFeb 02, 2006#4

brickandmortar wrote:Very sad indeed...What year are those budgets?


2004.

217
Junior MemberJunior Member
217

PostFeb 03, 2006#5

has the P-D ever looked at numbers like this for an article? I mean, it wouldn't take much writing at all - the charts tell the story.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostFeb 03, 2006#6

^ No because they couldn't blame St. Louis.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostFeb 03, 2006#7

its interesting to look at those numbers, because you can see that many of the local orgs get only a chunk of operating or capital cash, not both. The regional or state systems like NJ trasit are the ones who get both. See, Metro doesn't even need to get both, just help for one or the other would be fine.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostFeb 03, 2006#8

Sorry JM, but it's not a matter of getting both state and local funding. Rather, it's a matter of receiving any state support, when all other transit authorities across the nation with substantial systems receive state support.



Missouri contributes only about $1 million a year to Bi-State. However, each year, Bi-State pays about $900,000 back to Missouri in excise taxes on diesel fuel alone. Add in state income taxes on employees, inspection fees on fleet and equipment, and other costs, and Bi-State actually gives Missouri more money than the state gives it. Ridiculous!

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostFeb 03, 2006#9

I belive you didn't understand what i said southslider.

I was refering to getting either Capital or opretating help from the state, as other metropolitan system on the list above seem to do.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostFeb 03, 2006#10

Addressing JM's concern then, operating subsidy is needed from the state. Local governments have more then willing, via sales tax levies in the City, County and St. Clair, to provide the local match for construction.



Previously, the federal government provided operating subsidies, but that has now fallen increasingly on the states, with Missouri not responding. As such, locals, especially the City and County, for Missouri capital projects and operations, has increasingly funded everything.

217
Junior MemberJunior Member
217

PostFeb 03, 2006#11

I hope that a well-used and highly visible Cross County Metrolink line will prompt some of our state legislators to start asking why Missouri gives such a raw deal to public transit.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostFeb 06, 2006#12

Yeah does Bi-State answer to the governor/state legislature? I am guessing that the legislature determines Bi-States funds, and either Bi-State allocates the funds, or the legislature does this? The state of Missouri has always shafted St. Louis. Maybe they should remember that the reason Missouri became a state was due to the city of St. Louis being such a trade hub. The city existed before the state became a state, they need to remember that.

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostFeb 06, 2006#13

Metro chief: Region faces transportation ?crisis'

Buck Collier

Of the Suburban Journals

Oakville-Mehlville Journal

02/01/2006


Not only is the bi-state region's public transportation system facing a budget deficit projected to balloon from $5 million in the fiscal year that begins in July to $30 million in the next year,

Salci said local funding sources will have to generate the revenues needed to maintain and operate the system. While there might be support for another quarter-cent sales tax increase that would generate an estimated $50.5 million, he said that amount wouldn't solve the long-term financial problem facing Metro.


>>Link to Story