Tapatalk

What if we redid our riverfront?

What if we redid our riverfront?

19
New MemberNew Member
19

PostAug 11, 2012#1

As the years have passed, I have noticed that there have been a significant increase of historically correct buildings throughout the city. It started to make me wonder if we rebuilt the buildings that were lost in the construction of the Arch and the surrounding park. If we did what would you do? Would you try to redo the street grid and make a historically correct district? Would you build a new district with modern buildings and a unique layout? Tell me your thoughts and ideas.

Here are the pictures of the original riverfront.
http://stltoday.mycapture.com/mycapture ... ryID=23105
http://stltoday.mycapture.com/mycapture ... ryID=23105

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostAug 11, 2012#2

It's lamentable, but what's gone is gone. I'd leave it park land for now and focus redevelopment efforts on Laclede's Landings, Cupples Station, Downtown West, the remaining big buildings in the heart of downtown (Arcade, Chemical, Alverne, Jefferson Arms), and the north ends of Lafayette Square & Soulard.

2,437
Life MemberLife Member
2,437

PostAug 11, 2012#3

And Chouteau's Landing!

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostAug 11, 2012#4

^ The southernmost buildings in Chouteau's Landing closest to the MacArthur Bridge may need to go sometime in the near future.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostAug 11, 2012#5

We were extraordinarily lucky that Eero entered the competition and his design was picked. We lost a helluva lot of buildings and urban fabric with the demo but at least we got an iconic and interntationally-recognized structure that serves as the face of Saint Louis.... looking at the rest of the entries, we dodged a bullet of having complete crap being put up there.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostAug 12, 2012#6

I do love the Arch, but I wish the grounds were significantly smaller with everything north of Pine and south of Walnut preserved, including the street grid. At the very least I'd like to see the Old Rock House rebuilt along with some of the elevated warehouses along Warf St. (not directly in front of the Arch, of course).

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 13, 2012#7

mill204 wrote:^ The southernmost buildings in Chouteau's Landing closest to the MacArthur Bridge may need to go sometime in the near future.
How come?

8,924
Life MemberLife Member
8,924

PostAug 13, 2012#8

This has been posted before. Here are some great pics of what was buldozed to make room for the arch.

**Warning*** - grab a box of tissues before viewing.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=162521

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostAug 13, 2012#9

^Absolutely heartbreaking.

I don't know if this exists already, but a compilation thread in the photo section of the lost riverfront (as well as everything lost, in general) would be a great idea if it doesn't already exist.

Powerball fantasy - Replicate many of these buildings as closely as possible in other areas of the city/downtown where infill is needed. I know it misses the feel they would all have together in their original context, but many are just too cool not to try.

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostAug 13, 2012#10

Wow. Never really though about the size of those buildings that were demolished.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 13, 2012#11

^ There should be something on the Arch grounds or across from them detailing what was once there - throughout history.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostAug 13, 2012#12

One of the cooler things on the MPLS riverfront is the Mill Ruins Park. Rather than tearing down a flour mill that exploded, it was converted in its exploded state into an attraction. Combined with event space and surrounding condos, stone arch pedestrian bridge, the Guthrie Theater, and Gold Medal Park, and the lock/dam and Water Power park and St. Anthony Main, it makes for a terrific riverfront experience.

The point being, even some of the falling buildings could be artistically stabilized into cool spaces, and with a little creative thinking and some modern infill, a lot of the industrial detritus on the north and south ends of the riverfront could be transformed into great amenities.

1,649
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,649

PostAug 13, 2012#13

moorlander wrote:This has been posted before. Here are some great pics of what was buldozed to make room for the arch.

**Warning*** - grab a box of tissues before viewing.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=162521

As I think I've stated before, the Saint Louis riverfront had the largest collection of cast-iron architecture in the USA rivaled only by Soho in New York City.

An unspeakable tragedy.

678
Senior MemberSenior Member
678

PostAug 14, 2012#14

Is it crazy to suggest turning the Arch park into a more functional park? Add some tennis courts, handball connect some bike trails, to a revamped River Trail, etc.

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostAug 14, 2012#15

^ It's the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial. If you're not solemnly reflecting on the manifest destiny period of American imperialism, then what are you doing there?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 14, 2012#16

mill204 wrote:^ It's the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial. If you're not solemnly reflecting on the manifest destiny period of American imperialism, then what are you doing there?
There you go. The NPS says NO, but if you want to shape up the grounds a bit then they'll be happy to take our $200,000,000.

512
Senior MemberSenior Member
512

PostOct 10, 2012#17

I was just thinking about some ideas I've had to rejuvenate the St. Louis Riverfront (see: The Mississippi 1.2 Mile Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3) and decided to try out Google's Sketch Up app to give some life to 'em. What do you think?



I'd love to see the floodwall at Chouteau's Landing activated with something like this. The buildings within -- presumably home to restaurants, music venues, antique stores, apartments, etc. -- do something that the rest of the City doesn't...actually interact with the river.

Those back patios would offer great lookout points. An antique dealer could set up a selection of items at the base of the iron steps and sell from the street. A trolley (here's hoping!) arriving either from Trailhead Park or A-B can drop people off and pick people up, and the smells and sounds from the businesses waft out onto Wharf Street, encouraging people to explore the riverfront past the Archgrounds.

537
Senior MemberSenior Member
537

PostOct 10, 2012#18

Kevin B wrote:I was just thinking about some ideas I've had to rejuvenate the St. Louis Riverfront (see: The Mississippi 1.2 Mile Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3) and decided to try out Google's Sketch Up app to give some life to 'em. What do you think?



I'd love to see the floodwall at Chouteau's Landing activated with something like this. The buildings within -- presumably home to restaurants, music venues, antique stores, apartments, etc. -- do something that the rest of the City doesn't...actually interact with the river.

Those back patios would offer great lookout points. An antique dealer could set up a selection of items at the base of the iron steps and sell from the street. A trolley (here's hoping!) arriving either from Trailhead Park or A-B can drop people off and pick people up, and the smells and sounds from the businesses waft out onto Wharf Street, encouraging people to explore the riverfront past the Archgrounds.


Great idea! I could see something like the Riverfront Line in New Orleans, connect it with Metrolink at Laclede's Landing

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 10, 2012#19

"..actually interact with the river."

Eh, you really lost me there. :)

136
Junior MemberJunior Member
136

PostOct 10, 2012#20

And not to be a big downer but without an accessible route (American with Disabilities Act laws) that development would be highly limited.

Not including the fact that the US Army Corps of Engineers is EXTREMLY strict with what happens with their levees and flood wall protection systems, i.e. the idea would go no where...

But I like the creativity - keep up the good work (if that's any consolation).

512
Senior MemberSenior Member
512

PostOct 10, 2012#21

^ Ahh, but I considered that too, geoff. From my "The Mississippi (1.2) Mile -- Part 1" post:
Behind the flood walls, between Wharf St. and 1st St., the buildings' main entrances will be on a new, well-tended street protected from the waters and always accessible, even if Wharf St. is submerged. Honestly, it'd be just as intriguing if it were, as the back decks would then be suspended over the river!
There's more poorly done visuals about this idea in my "Clang! Clang! Clang! Goes The Trolley" post, showing that the "back porches" hanging over the walls is only a small part (but a cool part!) of the project. Within the flood wall, you have a central street and a group of buildings at which anybody can get in and experience it at ground level - including those with disability/accessibility needs.