Found this story on KSDK's site. Pretty interesting story, sad it never came to fruition.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/348062 ... -St-Louis-
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/348062 ... -St-Louis-

I most definitely would not want to lose any of our historic neighborhoods or areas, however, like you said, we could have become a global destination.DogtownBnR wrote:Where would this have been located? It may be a blessing that we did not lose a great
neighborhood like Soulard or more of the developed riverfront. It is a shame that we
do not have Disney here, but at the same time, it would have destroyed a lot of neighborhoods, if in the City somewhere. I would love to know what the park would have
done for the City. Look what it did for Orlando. I know that is a bigger
park, with better weather, than the one proposed here, but it would have made
St. Louis a national destination, if not global. Too bad!
I agree that it's not a pretty or well designed place, but there's a whole lot of money floating around that town that wouldn't be otherwise. The thought of living in Orlando makes me shudder though -- it would be hard to pick a city less like St. Louis than Orlando.imran wrote:I was thoroughly unimpressed by Orlando, and Disney. As an outsider I could not see what exactly Disney did for the city. There was a lot of cheap stucco resort buildings. A very dated feel to the whole place, or atleast what I saw of it.
