^That damn scultpure park has certainly got to be top 3 on my list of crimes against out great city.
Edit: Ok, maybe top 10.
Edit: Ok, maybe top 10.
Don't you dare say that!!! If Biondi hears you he'll tear down the Met as well as the Fox and Powell Hall for more sculpture park...and the parking lot needed to support it.Alex Ihnen wrote:All I know is that the sculpture park on the corner could sure use some space to grow!
Slightly OT: Remember that the intent for that site originally for new construction of two high-rise modernist buildings, which would've included the destruction of the former State of Missouri Office Building directly east of the "sculpture garden". That hasn't gone forward because of the housing collapse, and SLU knows that property is ridiculously underutilized. When the funding emerges again, you can look to that site being built upon and including the former MO State building's footprint as well.newstl2020 wrote:^That damn scultpure park has certainly got to be top 3 on my list of crimes against out great city.
Edit: Ok, maybe top 10.
I sure do. Whether or not that ever gets built, it's shown as being on the footprint of what is currently the MO State Office Building that SLU acquired some time ago & is sitting there shuttered. While I'm not sure how much I prefer seeing a shuttered building right next to SLU's campus, I don't think I'd like it any more if it had a few crappy "statues" in its place on another open field in the middle of the City.Alex Ihnen wrote:You mean this thing?
I think it helps Grand Center in the long run that this building is going residential vs the original plan to develop it into a hotel.framer wrote:Awesome! This project is gonna make a huge difference in Grand Center.
What do you think?framer wrote:Grand Center Inc. still expects the Hyatt project to move forward in the old Health Department (nee Missouri Theater) building at 634 N. Grand.
Hopefully, street level retail will at least be considered for this building then. I realize that ANY development that takes place here will likely provide an improvement over its current state (and the apartments seem like a great idea), but it would be great for this to add to the street life on Grand as well.Alex Ihnen wrote:Yes.
That sounds like a nice litter corner store. Which seems to be a good fit if their is access to parking involved.framer wrote:Last I heard, there was 1800 sq. ft. of retail planned for the first floor. That was over a year ago, so things may have changed.
Yep. Even bad artists are committed to what they do. Sometimes they don't realize they are bad.Roger Wyoming wrote:I love this excerpt from Tim Bryant's column:
Once the building is ready for residents, a panel will screen the applicants to make sure they are artists. This isn't to say the residents must be accomplished artists. Or as Huggett put it: "We don't look at the quality of your art. We look at your commitment to it."
I can picture a haven for bad artists.
too bad Hitler didn't stick with bad art. Oh my, I just went Godwin!the central scrutinizer wrote:
Yep. Even bad artists are committed to what they do. Sometimes they don't realize they are bad.
More seriously, how does one measure this?
