DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Discuss renovations and new residential construction in South City -- defined by the area south of Interstate 44/55.
roger wyoming II
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 8157
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:31 pm

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by roger wyoming II » Mon Feb 29, 2016 11:07 am

^ nice! And it looks like a planned construction fast track. (Although I guess that means they'll be built like crap.)
@STLRainbow


pat
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 11:10 am
Location: Shaw

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by pat » Mon Feb 29, 2016 11:41 am

Does anyone know why there aren't sound barriers on highways in the City?

I wonder if those would help houses do better next to the highway

User avatar
CarexCurator
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:04 pm
Location: Compton Heights

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by CarexCurator » Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:18 pm

^A better question is why DeTonty is a nice street over on Floyd's side of Tower Grove Avenue, but it is kept as a grassy berm all the way to Grand.

The Thurman Gateway project and the 44 food forest have great promise, but the tallest cup plant will not absorb as much noise as a cedar tree. Prairie is better than mown grass, but it needs a hedge of button bushes or something at the top of the hill.

At least on the other side of grand, there are natural rock walls and a slope rather than open air.
Edifice, schmidifice, let's talk about maintenance

User avatar
dbInSouthCity
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 5:58 pm

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by dbInSouthCity » Mon Feb 29, 2016 2:36 pm

Sound walls are literally the most controversial thing in road building...i think modot is being sued for putting them up on one side of 64 and the other side is suing for not having sound walls...its a lose-lose.

User avatar
STLEnginerd
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:46 pm
Location: Olivette

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by STLEnginerd » Mon Feb 29, 2016 2:56 pm

any idea what the final design looked like? There have been several iterations.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein


flipz
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:58 am

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by flipz » Mon Feb 29, 2016 5:02 pm

dbInSouthCity wrote:Sound walls are literally the most controversial thing in road building...i think modot is being sued for putting them up on one side of 64 and the other side is suing for not having sound walls...its a lose-lose.


I don't think people would mind if they put up hedge or densely planted trees to act as a barrier. Surely there are plants that don't need constant maintenance.

stlien
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 952
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:11 am

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by stlien » Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:03 pm



Crittenden said he hopes the first-phase apartments will be ready for tenants by late this summer.


This seems rather quick. In 6 months they will complete construction on 36 apts? Is that right?

dredger
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 3280
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:09 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by dredger » Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:38 pm

^ I don't think the expectations are too high. But probably doable, more so with slab and frame construction but not sure if that is desireable or you would desire for the St. Louis area.

User avatar
framer
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 6363
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: University City

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by framer » Mon Feb 29, 2016 11:51 pm

Please, god, no sound walls in the City!

onecity
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1051
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:49 am

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by onecity » Tue Mar 01, 2016 9:48 pm

Why?
f*** Terry Kennedy's deliberate destruction of the city.

User avatar
framer
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 6363
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: University City

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by framer » Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:39 am

^Seriously? Because they break every aesthetic rule in the book.

PeterXCV
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:23 am
Location: Fox Park

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by PeterXCV » Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:32 am

While I usually prefer to think of issues in a citywide manner and not give into hyper local views, I really think the people that live next to the highways should matter a lot more than the cars rushing by and their view. I mean the highway is a loud eyesore while a sound wall would be a quiet one, and they could also be painted.

pat
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 11:10 am
Location: Shaw

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by pat » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:05 am

Because they break every aesthetic rule in the book.


Aesthetic rule for who? Are you against sound walls because drivers can't see the city as they whiz by?

User avatar
moorlander
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 7556
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: East of Hanley

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by moorlander » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:12 am

I live exactly 1 mile north of 40/64and it's very loud.

pat
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 11:10 am
Location: Shaw

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by pat » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:51 am

^Agreed. I live about 4 blocks south of 44 in Shaw and there's a constant hum of highway noise. Its got to be incredibly annoying to be on Detonty with a window that faces the highway.

flipz
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:58 am

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by flipz » Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:46 am

In the city noise should be expected I think. The sides of the highway are just unsightly brush. Can you imagine living in Chicago with the L going through the alley behind your house/apartment? The L is probably louder than 15 lanes of traffic but is a bit more aesthetically pleasing.

onecity
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1051
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:49 am

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by onecity » Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:12 am

Why should you expect to compromise on livability if you live in the city? Highway sound it not a necessary evil. I realize you may not like the particular aesthetic of a particular wall, but it makes homes facing the highway a lot more pleasant. The downside is you can lose natural lighting depending on which direction the highway runs, but you have to agree both of these are better than having 10 lanes of interstate outside your front door.

https:[email protected],-93.2753265,3a,75y,298.38h,76.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPLaAI5IOUm5azltE_2eTLA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1

https:[email protected],-93.2754606,3a,75y,244.2h,88.26t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sJAju4sQ-Y-KJc7kZ-eAhzA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DJAju4sQ-Y-KJc7kZ-eAhzA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D217.67595%26pitch%3D0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1
f*** Terry Kennedy's deliberate destruction of the city.

User avatar
quincunx
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 3603
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: St Louis

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by quincunx » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:11 am

UIC [email protected]
Brick going up at DeTonty Street Apartments! @TowerGroveCDC @Shaw_STL

Image

User avatar
CarexCurator
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:04 pm
Location: Compton Heights

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by CarexCurator » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:32 am

flipz wrote:
dbInSouthCity wrote:Sound walls are literally the most controversial thing in road building...i think modot is being sued for putting them up on one side of 64 and the other side is suing for not having sound walls...its a lose-lose.


I don't think people would mind if they put up hedge or densely planted trees to act as a barrier. Surely there are plants that don't need constant maintenance.


You mean like bush honeysuckle? Probably eastern red cedar is the easiest. It's a naturally weedy pioneering species that can hold its own with evergreen density. It smells nice and offers good cover and food for birds. Without 'constant maintenance' you'd still get honeysuckle, tree of heaven, and the usual rogues gallery of invasives in any left over space though.

The Shaw Memorial Forest closer to Grand has a really good mix of native fruit bearing trees and shrubs with a few evergreens at the northern end. Everything there is still quite young, but it will clearly make a difference down the road.
Edifice, schmidifice, let's talk about maintenance

jambo
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: The Central Core

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by jambo » Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:10 am

Status Report- 15 Nov 16:

Image



Comparison photo: new construction (left) to old (right)

Image

mjbais1489
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:17 pm

Re: DeTonty Apartments and town homes

Unread post by mjbais1489 » Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:50 am

At the Shaw Neighborhood Meeting a week or two back Alderman Conway mentioned all the townhomes have been pre-sold. I think rentals should be moving in sometime this summer. there is a house near this project that UIC also re-did and it is still on the market for like $300k


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MattnSTL and 5 guests