170
Junior MemberJunior Member
170

Feb 03, 2017#1271

Maybe it isn't fair to project construction issues onto future operations, but the challenge I see for the trolley is figuring out what success looks like for them. For instance, will they be going back to taxpayers for additional funds in the future on top of the TDD that has been funneling money to them for a decade? Hard to even speculate about that since they've yet to share their pricing model with the community.

I get your point on giving them some leeway a this is their first rodeo. And I really tried to do so initially. But it's hard to trust people who have lied to me. Case in point: at a pre-construction open house I was told by a trolley rep that the DeBaliviere bridge would only be closed for "the summer". Then the first act of their construction project was to close the bridge for six months. Reaching out to them has typically only resulted in being told to subscribe to their weekly email construction updates, which have been intermittent and incomplete. For example, their construction emails promised a 10-day closing of Pershing at DeBaliviere at one point. The road was instead closed for nearly 30 days and no construction updates were sent out during the entirety of the closure.

It's entirely possible that my experience with them is unique. I certainly hope so. But I remain skeptical that a group that can't manage to successfully send out weekly emails will be able to run this trolley successfully. That being said, I really do hope I'm wrong.

4,490
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,490

Feb 06, 2017#1272

hiddeninput wrote:
Feb 03, 2017
Maybe it isn't fair to project construction issues onto future operations, but the challenge I see for the trolley is figuring out what success looks like for them. For instance, will they be going back to taxpayers for additional funds in the future on top of the TDD that has been funneling money to them for a decade? Hard to even speculate about that since they've yet to share their pricing model with the community.

I get your point on giving them some leeway a this is their first rodeo. And I really tried to do so initially. But it's hard to trust people who have lied to me. Case in point: at a pre-construction open house I was told by a trolley rep that the DeBaliviere bridge would only be closed for "the summer". Then the first act of their construction project was to close the bridge for six months. Reaching out to them has typically only resulted in being told to subscribe to their weekly email construction updates, which have been intermittent and incomplete. For example, their construction emails promised a 10-day closing of Pershing at DeBaliviere at one point. The road was instead closed for nearly 30 days and no construction updates were sent out during the entirety of the closure.

It's entirely possible that my experience with them is unique. I certainly hope so. But I remain skeptical that a group that can't manage to successfully send out weekly emails will be able to run this trolley successfully. That being said, I really do hope I'm wrong.
You are right. The TDD authority could struggle a bit, initially. I certainly hope not. I could be very wrong, but I see a lot (or enough) people riding this - especially older locals and tourists - because of the nostalgia of the cars. Either way, transit authorities ALWAYS go back to lean on taxpayers - sooner or later. ALWAYS.

I think Joe's TDD may have to get creative with some of the funding sources. Ads, sponsorships (like the Cincinnati line), sponsorship of stations, naming-rights etc. It would be great if Answers.com could sponsor a car or a station since they are HQ'd in the Delmar Loop - for example.

Also, I fully get why you have reservations. And this is not an excuse - but communication with the public regarding transit projects has been a problem in other cities too - even St. Louis with Metro. Some residents are okay with just enough info monthly, while others want information daily. However, they have to find a good balance when disseminating info to the public. I agree. Sometimes it comes across as apathy or as a lack of transparency, but the government - regardless of branch levels - can be dysfunctional.

Until there are LAWS put in place that require transit authorities to offer regular communication through specific platforms and information, they aren't going to share a lot - if there's no hardcore mandates. The well-managed systems will communicate well, but I know why it seems as though Joe's hasn't. Lack of experience. At the end of the day, those paying into the TDD need to be asking questions and requesting reports regularly.

Further, in the future, call your local representatives or the local media. I bet that move would have gotten the answers you were looking for. :D
Visit St. Louis' first urban topics forum started by me: stlouisrising.yuku.com

738
Senior MemberSenior Member
738

Feb 06, 2017#1273

Again I challenge the public to predict when this trolley folly will be abandoned and the streets returned to there original use.

2,716
Life MemberLife Member
2,716

Feb 06, 2017#1274

Sure are a lot of naysayers on these boards lately.

Geez, you would think you want things to fail.

Please leave this to STLtoday posters (and many other places online) and remember that these boards are for constructive and positive advancements and growth in the region. If you want to post hypothetical negative things about projects that are (trying) to make STL a better place to live for everyone, please do so somewhere else. :oops:
STL Proud!

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Feb 16, 2017#1275

Watched a trolley being off-loaded onto the tracks on Delmar this morning.

1,153
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,153

Feb 16, 2017#1276

hebeters2 wrote:
Feb 06, 2017
Again I challenge the public to predict when this trolley folly will be abandoned and the streets returned to there original use.
Move over to the Urban Theory thread if we're going to talk about streets being returned to their original use.

But yes, I agree that the biggest hurdle is ahead of us: ridership.

403
Full MemberFull Member
403

Feb 16, 2017#1277

For one i don't see how 1 person who has single handedly made the Delmar Loop what is today allow his very own Trolley become a utter disaster this person knows what he's doing and he's not going to be spot on 100% of the time however i believe this Trolley is going to be a complete success will help continue to spur development along Delmar specifically in the City..
Now only if this was on Washington Ave in the Loft district..

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

Feb 16, 2017#1278

Pictures on Loop Trolley's facebook album

https://www.facebook.com/pg/looptrolley ... 0604350286
If the world were populated by people who see it as it is, and not as it should be, how would civilization progress? Ruth Bader Ginsburg

2,069
Life MemberLife Member
2,069

Feb 16, 2017#1279

Is the Trolley doing itself any favors in public perception by being parked full of graffiti in front of the Metro train garage?

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

Feb 17, 2017#1280

bprop wrote:
Feb 16, 2017
Is the Trolley doing itself any favors in public perception by being parked full of graffiti in front of the Metro train garage?
:? What graffiti? Blame the photographer? As can be seen in the photos linked to by imran, they were unloading the trolley vehicle almost directly in front of their own building (the Loop Trolley storage and maintenance building) which happens to be located very near the large blank wall that is the Metro bus garage.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Feb 17, 2017#1281

Blueberry Hill ‏@BlueberryHillMO
The 1st @TheDelmarLoop Trolley Car has arrived!


4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

Feb 17, 2017#1282

^What an f'in force of nature. How many of us have thought, "Wouldn't it be cool to have a trolley running through [fill in preferred neighborhood/business district]." Incredible that he's actually seen it through and made it happen. I'm sure not everyone shares his exact vision, and the project has certainly had it's share of setbacks and hiccups, but nonetheless, what an incredible accomplishment.

Here are a of the highlights from the F'book post:





This one is from a prior post. It's of the Delmar & DeBaliviere station, which in my opinion looks GOOD:

5,890
Life MemberLife Member
5,890

Feb 17, 2017#1283

Bravo!

1,867
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,867

Feb 17, 2017#1284

I saw the green one on the highway today - pretty sad tag on it... :(

Feb 17, 2017#1285

But the paint will fade, and the cars really are beautiful!! This is exciting. :)
"A friend may well be reckoned the masterpiece of nature." RWE

5,890
Life MemberLife Member
5,890

Feb 17, 2017#1286

I think bprop is talking about one of the green Seattle cars; the genuinely historic (if Australian) ones. The car unloaded today appears to have been one of the red Portland cars, which are replica Brills. One of the green Seattle cars had been in front of Metrolink's shops by Union Station for a while. Which makes sense, as it was apparently St. Louis that bought the things, not Loop Trolley. Edwards is probably leasing the one that's been restored and is scheduled for service. The one/s that are/were downtown were doubtless of the other two. Shame the Peter Witts didn't work out financially.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

Feb 17, 2017#1287

Very interesting to see so many Metro vehicles in those photos. Were they brought in to consult during the process? Curious since the Trolley isn't associated with Metro...
"If there's two things I love, it's irony, miscounting and the Oxford comma."
-Andrew Volpe

170
Junior MemberJunior Member
170

Feb 17, 2017#1288

As a skeptic of this project, it's probably worth me saying that seeing the car on the tracks yesterday was pretty thrilling. Fingers crossed that all goes according to plan and that riders show up. On that last point, my dad, who grew up riding street cars to school in St. Louis but now lives out of town, is very eager to ride the Loop Trolley.

592
Senior MemberSenior Member
592

Feb 17, 2017#1289

You may love the project, hate the project, whatever... those cars are awesome. Kudos to Joe.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

Feb 17, 2017#1290

Now we need to a City street car to connect to this one and make a loop around downtown.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Feb 17, 2017#1291

The cars are very cool for what they are, but I personally would have preferred a modern style, like those in Kansas City.

214
Junior MemberJunior Member
214

Feb 17, 2017#1292

the historic streetcar look is great for the loop imo, since there is not a planned network for streetcars to build off this. Hopefully, though, this will gain traction and influence the development of a small network (built in phases maybe) that connect it and metrolink to downtown, grand center, the hill, tower grove, and soulard (historic and tourist friendly neighborhoods). That would really be something special.

5,562
Life MemberLife Member
5,562

Feb 17, 2017#1293

framer wrote:
Feb 17, 2017
The cars are very cool for what they are, but I personally would have preferred a modern style, like those in Kansas City.
I think user28 has good point as what the loop trolley is going after and why it makes sense that cars that have pursued.

However, outside of extending the loop trolley Delmar east into the city further/CWE I don't see the loop trolley as the basis for a broader streetcar network or to me even a worse idea. Instead, the April ballot could put the Metro/city in the position to start on N-S or at least the city street running version that would connect south city with downtown to at least new NGIA. That to me should be the basis for a modern street network and without a doubt be along the lines of KC modern streetcars.

In the meantime, really hope the Loop trolley is a success and more importantly encourage more development sooner than later. Rightly or wrongly, think perception of loop trolley as a success or not will make a big difference in how fixed transit within the city going forward. Related to the April ballot, it might be better that the trolleys weren't running last year as its success or not would the basis for most voting yes or no in April IMO. I really think north to south running street cars in the city is best fixed transit plan for the region going forward. The shortened N-S street running portion within the city might be how it happens

1,938
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,938

Feb 18, 2017#1294

user28 wrote:
Feb 17, 2017
the historic streetcar look is great for the loop imo, since there is not a planned network for streetcars to build off this. Hopefully, though, this will gain traction and influence the development of a small network (built in phases maybe) that connect it and metrolink to downtown, grand center, the hill, tower grove, and soulard (historic and tourist friendly neighborhoods). That would really be something special.
I would really love to see a future expansion head south through Dogtown to the Hill.

170
Junior MemberJunior Member
170

Feb 19, 2017#1295

Joe Edwards was at the 28th ward meeting last Thursday. When asked about future expansion, he said the logical extension was a loop in Forest Park.

Read more posts (1045 remaining)